Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » The effect of university organizational culture on organizational silence and faculty–student interaction

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2653)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (49)
  • SCI (50)

MSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 16 (16)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Competitive advantage(98)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Management Science Letters
ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 11 Issue 7 pp. 2151-2162, 2021

The effect of university organizational culture on organizational silence and faculty–student interaction Pages 2151-2162 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Jongsung Kim, Sung-Hoon Ko

📋 Author Affiliations:
Kim J., Ko S.
¹ N/A
doi 10.5267/j.msl.2021.2.013
3 Source: Scopus
Crossref 6 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Organizational culture Organizational silence Interactions Faculty

Abstract: Colleges/universities outside the Seoul metropolitan area (hereafter “non-Seoul universities”) are in a crisis of existence due to a decline in the school-aged population in South Korea. Most non-Seoul universities are making efforts to implement self-rescue measures for survival. This study examines the relationships among different types of organizational culture (innovative, collective, rational, and hierarchical), organizational silence (acquiescent, prosocial, and defensive), and faculty–student interaction as perceived by non-Seoul university professors to provide useful implications for effective human resource management plans for the professors, who are responsible for entrance examinations and education at non-Seoul universities in crisis. An online survey was employed to collect data from professors at private community colleges/universities outside the Seoul metropolitan area. Responses from 421 professors were used for data analysis. Results are as follows. First, when professors perceived innovative and collective cultures, their defensive silence decreased while prosocial silence increased. Second, when rational culture was perceived, defensive silence increased while prosocial silence decreased. Third, acquiescent silence increased while prosocial silence decreased when hierarchical culture was perceived. Fourth, faculty–student interaction was enhanced when innovative and collective cultures were prevalent. Finally, prosocial silence had a positive effect on faculty–student interaction. The findings imply that if university managers change policy to encourage professors to perceive the university culture as innovative and collective, prosocial silence, which is positive from the organization’s perspective, will increase, facilitating interactions between professors and students.

How to cite this paper
APA: Kim, J & Ko, S. (2021). The effect of university organizational culture on organizational silence and faculty–student interaction. Management Science Letters, 11(7), 2151-2162.
Chicago/Turabian: Kim, J & Ko, S. 2021. "The effect of university organizational culture on organizational silence and faculty–student interaction." Management Science Letters 11, no. 7 (2021): 2151-2162.
AMA: Kim, J & Ko, S. The effect of university organizational culture on organizational silence and faculty–student interaction. Management Science Letters. 2021;11(7):2151-2162.

References
Astin, A. W. (1977). Four critical years: Effect of college on beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Astin, A. W. (1993) What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Beckett, R. D., Sheppard, L., Rosene, A., & Whitlock, C. (2016). Student and faculty perceptions of humor in the pharma-cy classroom. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 226–234.
Beer, M., & Eisenstat, R. A. (2000). The silent killers of strategy implementation and learning. Sloan Management Review, 41(4), 29–409.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2006). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing value framework. Readings MA: Addison-Wesley.
Chickering, A. W. (1969). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Choi, B. I. (2010). A Study on the relationship between universities’ organizational culture type and organizational effec-tiveness. Korea Research Institute for Balanced Development, 5(1), 51–77.
Choi, B. K., Yu, H. S., & Byun, H. J. (2016). The influences of faculty perception of belonging college on their interaction with students. The Korea Educational Review, 22(1), 53–76.
Choi, J. Y., & Shin, H. S. (2010). The nature and effects of student–faculty interaction on higher education learning out-comes in Korean universities. The Journal of Korean Education, 37(2), 131–154.
Choi, K. M., & Kim, K. T. (2016). The multi-path mediated effect of positive psychological capital, organizational com-mitment on the relationship between school organizational culture and organizational effective perceived by elemen-tary school teachers. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 34(4), 215–234.
Firestone, W. A., & Wilson, B. L. (1984). Culture of school is a key to more effective instruction. NASSP Bulletin, 68(476), 7–12.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(February), 39¬–50.
Gaski, J. F. (1984). The theory of power and conflict in channels of distribution. Journal of Marketing, 48(Summer), 9–29.
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 132–160.
Goldring, L. (2002). The power of school culture. Leadership. November/ December 2002.
Graen, G., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall International.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kang, J. S., & Go, D. Y. (2014). An empirical study on the effects of public organizational silence on turnover intention––focusing on the Korean coast guard. The Korean Journal of Public Administration, 23(2), 243–274.
Kim, J. K. (1991). A study on the diagnosis of school organizational culture (Doctoral dissertation). Cheonbuk University.
Kim, Y. K. (2008). The effects of organizational culture and leadership type on the organizational effectiveness in the school organizations (Doctoral dissertation). Chosun University.
Kim, H. J., & Jun, Y. K. (2011). The effects of task-oriented and relationship-oriented principal leadership on teacher sat-isfaction through school organizational climate and teacher efficacy. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 28(3), 79¬–99.
Kim, J. B., & Kim, N. H. (2009). Validation of student–teacher attachment relationship scale (STARS) as a basis for eval-uating teachers' educational competencies. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 23(4), 697–714.
Kritek, W. J. (1986). School culture and school improvement. ED 277 783.
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we are learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35(2), 24–32.
Kuh, G. D., Kinize, J., Buckely, J. A., Brigdes, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature. Commissioned report for the National Symposium on Post-Secondary Student Success: Spearheading a Dialog on Student Success.
Lee, S. Y. (2020). Analysis of the effect of school organizational culture and professional learning communities on school organization effectiveness perceived by school teachers. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 38(4), 133–156.
Marx, R. W., & Walsh, J. (1988). Learning from academic tasks. Elementary School Journal, 88, 207–220.
Mayer, R. E. (2011). Applying the science of learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Milliken, J. F., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453–1476.
Morrison, E. W., & Millikenk, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706–725.
Oh, H. G., Kim, H. Y., & Lee, S. J. (2018). A study on the effects of group culture in public organizations: Focused on the improvement of job performance through employees’ organizational commitment. Social Science Research Review, 34(2), 1–28.
Owens, R. G. (2001). Organizational behavior in education: Instructional leadership and school reform. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Park, D. H. (2014). Analysis of the structural relationship among teacher leadership, school organizational culture, and school organizational effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation). Dong-A University.
Park, J. H., & Shin, S. M. (2018). In school organization, the effects of perceived organizational politics and LMX on or-ganizational silence. The Journal of Politics of Education, 25(3), 1–30.
Park, J. J. (2008). A study on the relationship among teacher leadership in knowledge society, school organizational cul-ture, and organizational effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation). Kookmin University.
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students (Vol. 2): A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pinder, C. C., & Harlos, K. P. (2001), Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 331–370.
Probst, T. M., Stewart, S. M., Gruys, M. L., & Tierney, B. W. (2007). Productivity, counter productivity and creativity: The ups and downs of job insecurity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(3), 479–497.
Quinn, R. E., & McGrath M. R. (1985). The Transformation of Organizational Cultures: A Competing Values Perspective. In Frost, P. et al. (eds.). Organizational Culture. Beverly Hills, Cal.: Sage.
Sackett, P. R., Berry, C. M., Wiemann, S. A., & Laczo, R. M. (2006). Citizenship and counterproductive behavior: Clarify-ing relations between the two domains. Human Performance, 19(4): 441–464.
Shim, W. G., & Choi, H. G. (2014). The effect of organizational culture on job satisfaction, customer orientation and ser-vice delivery level in university. Journal of Creativity and Innovation, 7(2), 191–224.
Shin, H. S. (1993). An analysis of Korean higher education: Multi-perspectives. The Journal of Research in Education, 6, 134¬–155.
Shin, H. C. (2016). Silent university, who will wake you up? Korea University Studies Association, 12, 32–42.
Song, Y. M., & Yu, S. B. (2020). The effects of university students’ high-impact educational practices, professor–student interaction on university students’ institutional commitment. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(16), 885–905.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student Attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Vakola, M., & Bouradas, D. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence: An empirical investigation. Employee Relations, 27(5), 441–458.
Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. The Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359–1392.
Weidman, J. C. (1989). Undergraduate socialization: A conceptual approach. In J. Smart (ed.). Higher education: Hand-book of theory and research (5. pp. 289–322). New York: Agathon.
Weinstein, C. S., & Mignano, A. J. (1996). Secondary classroom management: Lessons from research and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Whiteside, D. B., & Barclay, L. J. (2013). Echoes of silence: Employee silence as a mediator between overall justice and employee outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2). 251–266.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Management Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2021 | 📖 Volume: 11 | 📄 Issue: 7 | 👁️ Views: 1925 | 📊 Crossref: 6

Related Articles:
  • The effect of transformational leadership style and organizational culture on the formation of organizational cynicism in the Agricultural Bank of Tehran
  • Designing a model to improve first year student adjustment to university
  • Illuminating employees’ organizational silence
  • Recognizing influencing factors on students' leadership trait potential
  • An empirical analysis on influencing factors on organizational silence and its relationship with employee’s organizational commitment

📝 Ready to share your research?

Management Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com