Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters

Journals

  • IJIEC (726)
  • MSL (2637)
  • DSL (649)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (404)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (247)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (26)
  • SCI (26)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)

Keywords

Supply chain management(163)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(148)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(108)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
Competitive advantage(93)
SMEs(86)
optimization(84)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(81)
TOPSIS(80)
Job satisfaction(79)
Sustainability(79)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Genetic Algorithm(76)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(60)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sautma Ronni Basana(27)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2177)
Indonesia(1278)
Jordan(784)
India(782)
Vietnam(500)
Saudi Arabia(440)
Malaysia(438)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(182)
Thailand(151)
United States(110)
Turkey(103)
Ukraine(102)
Egypt(97)
Canada(92)
Pakistan(84)
Peru(83)
Morocco(79)
United Kingdom(79)
Nigeria(77)


» Show all countries
Sort articles by: Volume | Date | Most Rates | Most Views | Reviews | Alphabet
1.

Maintainability assessment for software by using a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria analysis approach Pages 255-274 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Shivani Kundu, Kirti Tyagi

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2017.3.005

Keywords: Maintainability, Maintainability factors, AHP, Multi-criteria fuzzy AHP, Similarity based approach

Abstract:
Maintainability plays a fundamental role for achieving success in software system and it is con-sidered as an important quality characteristics. Maintainability may be predicted efficiently by us-ing soft computing techniques as they provide good results. In this paper similarity- based ap-proach is used with the contribution of fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) and fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) at 2-level hierarchy. Here similarity- based approach illustrates the combine approach of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. This approach is used to provide the rank of software to select the best one for maintainability estimation. Also, several factors are presented that influence the software maintainability. These factors are taken as criterion and three software products are taken as alternatives.
Details
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: MSL | Year: 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 6 | Views: 2029 | Reviews: 0

 
2.

Impact of absorptive capacity and dominant logic on innovation performance of public sector organizations in Hefei (Anhui Province), China Pages 275-284 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Farhan Khan, Zhang Xuehe, Fouzia Atlas, Kashif Ullah Khan, Adnan Pitafi, Muhammad Usman Saleem

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2017.3.004

Keywords: Innovation performance, Public organization, Dominant logic

Abstract:
Public organization’s performance depends on multiple aspects in which there are different polit-ical and public actors involved. In this study, we discuss the innovation performance of public organizations’ in Hefei (Anhui province), China. Our targeted group for this study were public sector employees at different levels within the organizations being considered. We checked the effect of absorptive capacity (ACAP), and dominant logic on public organization’s innovation performance. We found that absorptive capacity and dominant logic had a positive relation-ship with firms’ performance. Furthermore, these predictors were not only improving firm’s per-formance, but also bring innovation into the public organizations.
Details
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: MSL | Year: 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 6 | Views: 2276 | Reviews: 0

 
3.

Multi-criteria decision making approach for the selection of software effort estimation model Pages 285-296 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Ashu Bansal, Brijesh Kumar, Rakesh Garg

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2017.3.003

Keywords: Selection criteria, WDBA, Effort Estimation, MCDM

Abstract:
Software development with minimum effort has become a challenging task for the software developers. Software effort may be defined as the prediction process of the effort required to develop any software. Many software effort estimation models have been developed in the past, but it is observed that none of them can be applied successfully in all kinds of projects in different environments that raise the problem of the software effort estimation model selection. To select the suitable software effort estimation model, many conflicting selection criteria must be considered in the decision process. The present study emphasizes on the development of a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach by integrating Fuzzy Set Theory and Weighted Distance Based Approximation. To show the consistency of the proposed approach, methodology validation is also performed by making comparison with existing methodologies and to check the criticality of the selection criterion, sensitivity analysis is also performed.
Details
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: MSL | Year: 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 6 | Views: 2161 | Reviews: 0

 
4.

A subjective and objective fuzzy-based analytical hierarchy process model for prioritization of lean product development practices Pages 297-310 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Daniel O. Aikhuele, Faiz M. Turan

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2017.3.002

Keywords: Lean product development, Fuzzy-based AHP model, Fuzzy pairwise comparison matrix, Arithmetic mean equation, Evaluation matrix

Abstract:
In this paper, a subjective and objective fuzzy-based Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model is proposed. The model which is based on a newly defined evaluation matrix replaces the fuzzy comparison matrix (FCM) in the traditional fuzzy AHP model, which has been found ineffective and time-consuming when criteria/alternatives are increased. The main advantage of the new model is that it is straightforward and completely eliminates the repetitive adjustment of data that is common with the FCM in traditional AHP model. The model reduces the complete dependen-cy on human judgment in prioritization assessment since the weights values are solved automati-cally using the evaluation matrix and the modified priority weight formula in the proposed mod-el. By virtue of a numerical case study, the model is successfully applied in the determination of the implementation priorities of lean practices for a product development environment and com-pared with similar computational methods in the literature.
Details
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: MSL | Year: 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 6 | Views: 1916 | Reviews: 0

 
5.

An optimal maintenance policy for machine replacement problem using dynamic programming Pages 311-320 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Mohsen Sadegh Amalnik, Morteza Pourgharibshahi

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2017.3.001

Keywords: Machine replacement, Dynamic programming, Sequential sampling plan, Maintenance

Abstract:
In this article, we present an acceptance sampling plan for machine replacement problem based on the backward dynamic programming model. Discount dynamic programming is used to solve a two-state machine replacement problem. We plan to design a model for maintenance by consid-ering the quality of the item produced. The purpose of the proposed model is to determine the optimal threshold policy for maintenance in a finite time horizon. We create a decision tree based on a sequential sampling including renew, repair and do nothing and wish to achieve an optimal threshold for making decisions including renew, repair and continue the production in order to minimize the expected cost. Results show that the optimal policy is sensitive to the data, for the probability of defective machines and parameters defined in the model. This can be clearly demonstrated by a sensitivity analysis technique.
Details
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: MSL | Year: 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 6 | Views: 2573 | Reviews: 0

 

® 2010-2025 GrowingScience.Com