Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » An integrated framework for cost- benefit analysis in road safety projects using AHP method

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2653)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (49)
  • SCI (50)

MSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 16 (16)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Competitive advantage(98)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(84)
Financial performance(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Management Science Letters
ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 1 Issue 4 pp. 551-558, 2011

An integrated framework for cost- benefit analysis in road safety projects using AHP method Pages 551-558 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Mahsa Mohamadian, Siamak Noori, Seyed Mohamad Seyed Hosseini

📋 Author Affiliations:
Mahsa Mohamadian, Siamak Noori, Seyed Mohamad Seyed Hosseini ORCID
¹ Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science & Technology, Tehran, Iran
doi 10.5267/j.msl.2011.05.001
Crossref Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Analytical hierarchy process (AHP), Cost benefit analysis (CBA), Road safety

Abstract: Cost benefit analysis (CBA) is a useful tool for investment decision-making from economic point of view. When the decision involves conflicting goals, the multi-attribute analysis approach is more capable; because there are some social and environmental criteria that cannot be valued or monetized by cost benefit analysis. The complex nature of decision-making in road safety normally makes it difficult to reach a single alternative solution that can satisfy all decision-making problems. Generally, the application of multi-attribute analysis in road sector is promising; however, the applications are in preliminary stage. Some multi-attribute analysis techniques, such as analytic hierarchy process (AHP) have been widely used in practice. This paper presents an integrated framework with CBA and AHP methods to select proper alternative in road safety projects. The proposed model of this paper is implemented for a case study of improving a road to reduce the accidents in Iran. The framework is used as an aid to cost benefit tool in road safety projects.

How to cite this paper
APA: Mohamadian, M., Noori, S & Hosseini, S. (2011). An integrated framework for cost- benefit analysis in road safety projects using AHP method. Management Science Letters, 1(4), 551-558.
Chicago/Turabian: Mohamadian, M., Noori, S & Hosseini, S. 2011. "An integrated framework for cost- benefit analysis in road safety projects using AHP method." Management Science Letters 1, no. 4 (2011): 551-558.
AMA: Mohamadian, M., Noori, S & Hosseini, S. An integrated framework for cost- benefit analysis in road safety projects using AHP method. Management Science Letters. 2011;1(4):551-558.

References
Bax, C., Elvik, R, & Veisten, K. (2009). Knowledge utilization in road safety policy: Barriers to the
use of knowledge from economic analysis. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 22(4), 275–285.

Campbell, H. & Brown, R. (2005). A multiple account framework for cost –benefit analysis.
Evaluation and Program Planning, 28(1), 23–32.

Decorla-Souza, P., Everett, J., Gardner, B. & Culp, M. (1997). Total cost analysis: An alternative to
benefit-cost analysis in evaluating transportation alternatives. Transportation, 24(2), 107–123.

Dyer, J.S. & Wendel, R.E. (1985). A Critique of Analytic Hierarchy Process. Working Paper 84/85-
4-24. Department of Management, The University of Texas at Austin.

Dolan J.G. (2008). Shared decision-making – transferring research into practice: The Analytic
Hierarchy Process (AHP). Patient Education and Counseling, 73(3), 418–425.

Elvik, R. (2001). Cost–benefit analysis of road safety measures: Applicability and controversies.
Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33(1), 9–17.

Elvik, R. (2003). How would setting policy priorities according to cost–benefit analyses affect the
provision of road safety?. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35(4), 557–570.

Elvik, R. (2009). The trade - off between efficiency and equity in road safety policy. Safety Science,
47(6), 817–825.

Elvik, R. (2010). Strengthening incentives for efficient road safety policy priorities: The roles of cost
– benefit analysis and road pricing. Safety Science, 48(9), 1189–1196.

Elvik, R. (2010). Why some road safety problems are more difficult to solve than others?. Accident
Analysis and Prevention, 42(4), 1089-1096.

Hauer, E. (1994). Can one estimate the value of life or is it better to be dead than stuck in traffic?
Transportation Research Series A, 28(2), 109–118.

Harker, P.T. (1987). Incomplete pairwise comparisions in the analytival hierarchy process.
Mathematical Modelling, 9(11), 837-848.

Hauer, E. (2011). Computing what the public wants: Some issues in road safety cost–benefit analysis.
Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(1), 151-164.

Henderson, R.D. & Dutta, S.P. (1992). Use of the analytic hierarchy process in ergonomic analysis.
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 9(4), 275-82.

Joksch, H.C. (1975). A critical appraisal of the applicability of cost– benefit analysis to highway
traffic safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 7(2), 133–153.

Ivehammar, P. (2008). Valuing in actual travel time environmental encroachment caused by transport
infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 13(7), 455-461.

Wijnen, W., Wesemann, P. & Blaeij, A. (2009). Valuation of road safety effects in cost–benefit
analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(4), 326–331.

Womer, N. K., Bougnol , M. L. & Dula, J. H. (2006). Benefit- cost analysis using data envelopment
analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 145(1), 229–250.

Saaty, T.L., & Vargas, L.G. (1984). Inconsistency and rank preservation. Mathematical Psychology,
28(2), 205-214.

Salling, K.B. & Banister, D. (2009). Assessment of large transport infrastructure projects: The CBADK
model. Transportation Research Part A, 43(9-10), 800–813.

Torfi, F., Zanjirani Farahani, R. & Rezapour, S. (2010). Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights
of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives. Applied Soft Computing, 10(2),
520–528.

Zahedi, F. (1987). A utility approach to the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-
5), 387-395.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Management Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2011 | 📖 Volume: 1 | 📄 Issue: 4 | 👁️ Views: 2479 | 📊 Crossref:

Related Articles:
  • A new approach to evaluate railways efficiency considering safety measures
  • A BOCR and Fuzzy AHP method for identification and prioritization of carpet industry strategies
  • An empirical study for ranking risk factors using linear assignment: A case study of road construction
  • A hybrid Kano-fuzzy AHP method for measuring customer satisfaction: A case study of transportation system
  • Reliability prediction for the vehicles equipped with advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and passive safety systems (PSS)

📝 Ready to share your research?

Management Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com