Abstract: Public organization’s performance depends on multiple aspects in which there are different polit-ical and public actors involved. In this study, we discuss the innovation performance of public organizations’ in Hefei (Anhui province), China. Our targeted group for this study were public sector employees at different levels within the organizations being considered. We checked the effect of absorptive capacity (ACAP), and dominant logic on public organization’s innovation performance. We found that absorptive capacity and dominant logic had a positive relation-ship with firms’ performance. Furthermore, these predictors were not only improving firm’s per-formance, but also bring innovation into the public organizations.
How to cite this paper
Khan, F., Xuehe, Z., Atlas, F., Khan, K., Pitafi, A & Saleem, M. (2017). Impact of absorptive capacity and dominant logic on innovation performance of public sector organizations in Hefei (Anhui Province), China.Management Science Letters , 7(6), 275-284.
Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R., & Chiva, R. . (2006). A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4), 333-346. Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2013). Linking entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the role of organizational learning capability and innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Manage-ment, 51(4), 491-507. Amit, S. (2003). Unraveling the Resource-Based Tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24 (2), 309-323. Amit, R. (1993). Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33-46. Barney, J. (1986a). Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck and business strategy. Management Science, 323, 1231–1241. Barney, J. (1986b). Organization culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? . Academy of Management Review, 11, 656–665. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-100. Boeker, W. (1997). Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top management movement on product market entry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 213-236. Branzei, O. (2006). Strategic pathways to product innovation capabilities in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 21 75–105. Bruton, G. D. (2008). Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies: Where Are We Today and Where Should the Research Go in the Future. ET&P, 1042-2587. Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management,, 31(6), 515-326. Carmeli, A. a. T., A. (2004). The relationships between intangible organizational elements and organi- zational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (13), 1257- 1278. César Camisón, B. F. s. (2010). Knowledge absorptive capacity: New insights for its conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Business Research, 63, 707-715. Chandler, G. N., Hanks, S.H. (1994). Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(4), 331-349. Charles, H. (2000). Dominant logic and the iron cage. Advances in Strategic Management, 17, 187-191. Chen, C.-L., and Jaw, Y.-L. . (2009). Building global dynamic capabilities through innovation: A case study of Taiwan's cultural organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26 (4), 247-263. Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6, 1-22. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. The eco-nomic journal, 99(397), 569-596. Cohen, L. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. JSTOR, 128-152. Covin, J. G., Slevin, D.P. (1990). New venture strategic posture, structure, and performance: an industry life cycle analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(2), 123-135. Covin, J. G., Slevin, D.P., & Covin, T.J. (1990). Content and performance of growth-seeking strategies: a comparison of small firms in high- and low-technology industrie. Journal of Business Venturing, 5 (6), 391-412. Davenport, T. H. P., L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press. Boston. Dierickx, c. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511. Eisenhardt, K., and J. Martin. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 11051121. Ellis, H. C. (1965). The Transfer of Learning. New York: MacMill. Estes, W. K. (1970). Learning Theory and Mental Development. New York. Academic Press. Fernandez. (2007). Under what conditions do public managers favor and pursue organizational change? The American Review of Public Administration, 37, 324-341. Fingenbaum, A., & Karnani, A. (1991). Output flexibility: a competitive advantage for small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 101-114. Freeser, H., Willard, G. (1990). Founding strategy and performance: a comparison of high and low growth high-tech firms. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 367-386. Grundstein, M. (2007). Knowledge workers as an integral component in global information system design,. Information Resources Management. Global Challenge, Idea Group Publishing, 236-261. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge management's social dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 71. Helfat, C. E., Peteraf, M.A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability life cycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 997-1010. Henderson, R., Cockburn. (1994). Measuring competence: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 63-84. Hennessey, J. T. (1998). “Reinventing” government: Does leadership make a difference? Public Administration Review, 58, 322-332. Ho, L.-A. (2008). What affects organizational performance?: The linking of learning and knowledge management. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 108 (9), 1234-1254. Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago. University of Chicago Press. Hoopes, D. G., Tammy Madsen & Gordon Walker. (2003). Why is there a resource-based view? towards a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 889-902. Huff, A. S. (1982). Industry influences on strategy reformulation. Strategic Management Journal, 3(2), 119-131. Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408-417. Kelley, D. J., & Rice, M.P. (2002). Advantage beyond founding: the strategic use of technologies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 41-57. Kiesler S, S. L. (1982). Managerial response to changing environments: perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 548-570. King, W. R. (2009). Knowledge management and organizational learning. Annals of information systems. Springer Science., 4. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1_1 Leung, S. F. (2009). Psychometric properties of the SCOFF questionnaire (Chinese version) for screening eating disorders in Hong Kong secondary school students: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 239-247. Lin, C., Tan, B., & Chang, S. (2002). The critical factors for technology absorptive capacity. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(6), 300-308. Lippman, S., A. & Richard Rumelt. (2003). The payments perspective: micro-foundations of resource analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 903-927. Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 387-401. McCann, J. E. (1991). Patterns of growth, competitive technology, and financial strategies in young ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 6 (3), 189-208. McDougall, P. P., Robinson Jr., R.B., DeNisi, A.S. (1992). Modeling new venture performance: an analysis of new venture strategy, industry structure, and venture origi. Journal Business Venturing, 7, 276-289. Meyer, M. W. (1979). Organizational structure as signaling. Pacific Sociological Review, 22(4), 481-500. Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. (2005). Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: Transac-tions, resources, and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6), 600-621. Mustafa Kamal, E., & Flanagan, R. (2012). Understanding absorptive capacity in Malaysian small and medium sized (SME) construction companies. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technolo-gy, 10(2), 180-198. Nadkarni. (2007). Prior conditions and early international commitment: the mediating role of domestic mindset. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 160-176. Newbert, S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 121–146. Kolvereid, L., & Obloj, K. (1994). Entrepreneurship in Emerging Versus Mature Econom ies: An Ex-ploratory Survey. International Small Business Journal, 12(4), 14-27. Oblój, K., & Pratt, M. (2005). Happy kids and mature losers: Differentiating the dominant logics of successful and unsuccessful firms in emerging markets. Strategy in transition, 81-104. Obloj, T. (2010). Dominant Logic and Entrepreneurial Firms’ Performance in a Transition Economy. ET&P, 1042-2587. Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (3), 179-191. Pirolli, P. L., & Anderson, J.R. (1985). The role of learning from ex- ample in the acquisition of re- cursive programming skill. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 240-272. Porter, M. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 95-117. Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic management journal, 7(6), 485-501. Prahald. (2004). The blinders of dominant logic. Long Range Planning, 37, 171-179. Sandberg, W. R. (1986). New Venture Performance: The Role of Strategy and Industry Structure. Lexington, Lexington, MA. Schoemaker, P. (1990). Strategy, complexity, and economic rent. Management Science, 36(10), 1178-1192. Schroeder, R. G., Bates, K.A., & Junttila, M.A. (2002). A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 105-117. Siggelkow, N. (2002). Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: Organizational consequences. Management Science, 48(7), 900-916. Simon, H. A. (1995). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118. Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of sticki-ness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9-27. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic manage-ment. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. Teece, D. J. (2000). Strategies for managing knowledge assets: The role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Planning, 33, 35-54. TRIPSAS, M. (2000). Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Managemeny Journal, 21, 1147-1161. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180. Wiig, K. M. (2003). Knowledge Management Foundations. Schema Press. Arlington. Zahra. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension Academy of management review, 27, 185-203. Zehir, C. (2016). The effect of SHRM practices on innovation performance: The mediating role of global capabilities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235 797 – 806.