A multi attribute decision making method for selection of optimal assembly line

Abstract: With globalization, sweeping technological development, and increasing competition, customers are placing greater demands on manufacturers to increase quality, flexibility, on time delivery of product and less cost. Therefore, manufacturers must develop and maintain a high degree of coherence among competitive priorities, order winning criteria and improvement activities. Thus, the production managers are making an attempt to transform their organization by adopting familiar and beneficial management philosophies like cellular manufacturing (CM), lean manufacturing (LM), green manufacturing (GM), total quality management (TQM), agile manufacturing (AM), and just in time manufacturing (JIT). The main objective of this paper is to propose an optimal assembly method for an engine manufacturer’s assembly line in India. Currently, the Indian manufacturer is following traditional assembly method where the raw materials for assembly are kept along the sideways of conveyor line. It consumes more floor space, more work in process inventory, more operator's walking time and more operator's walking distance per day. In order to reduce the above mentioned wastes, lean kitting assembly is suggested by some managers. Another group of managers suggest JIT assembly as it consumes very less inventory cost compared to other types of assembly processes. Hence, a Multi-attribute decision making model namely analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is applied to analyse the alternative assembly methods based on various important factors.

How to cite this paper

 Ramnath, B., Elanchezhian, C & Kesavan, R. (2011). A multi attribute decision making method for selection of optimal assembly line.Management Science Letters , 1(1), 65-72.

Refrences

Azim, A. (1999). Using simulation to design a lean material delivery system in an automotive body shop. SAE Technical paper series, 1999-01-1643, 1-5.

Barker, R. C. (1999). Production systems without MRP: A lean time based design. International Journal of Management Science, 22(4), 349-360.

Bicheno J., Holweg M. & Niessmann J. (2001). Constraint batch sizing in a lean environment. International Journal of Production Economics, 73, 41-49.

Ben Naylor, Nair, M. & Berry, D. (1999). Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62, 107-118.

Brynzor, H., & Johansson, M. I. (1995). Design and performance of kitting and order picking system. International Journal of Production Economics, 4, 115- 125.

Chrisrmansson, M. & Medbo, L. (2002). A case study of principally new way of materials kitting an evaluation of time consumption and physical work load. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,30, 49-65.

Frank, C. & Garcia, (2000). Using value stream mapping as a strategic planning and implementation tool. European Management Journal, 16, 327-224.

Grajo, S. (1996). Strategic layout planning and simulation for lean manufacturing - A layout tutorial. Proceedings of the 1996 Winter Simulation Conference, 561-568.

Gunther, H.O., Gronalt, M. & Piller, F. (1996). Compact kitting in semi-automated printed circuit board assembly. International Journal of Production Economics, 43, 213-226.

Karthik, V.N. (2006). An integrated supplier selection methodology for designing robust supply chains. IEEE International conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, 906-910.

Tamaki, K., & Nof, Y. (1991). Design method of robot kitting system for flexible assembly. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 8, 255 – 273.

Kull J. & Talluri S. (2008). A supply risk reduction model using integrated multi criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2008, 55(3), 409-419.

Luis, M., Sanche, Z. & Nagi, R., (2001). A review of agile manufacturing system. International Journal of production Research, 39(16),3651-3600.

Houshmand, M. & Jamshidnezhad, B. (2006). An Extended Model of design process of lean production systems by means of process variables. Robotics and computer Integrated Manufacturing, 22, 1-16.

Medbo, L. (2003). Assembly work execution and materials kit functionality in parallel flow assembly systems. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 31, 263 - 281.

Oliver, N., Delbridge, R. & Barton, H. (2002). Lean production and manufacturing performance improvement in Japan, The UK and US. ESRC Business Research, University of Cambridge.

Panizzolo. R. (1998) Applying the lessons learned from 27 lean manufacturers, the relevance of relationship management. International Journal of Production Economics, 55, 223-240.

Rao Tummala, V.M., Chin, K.S. & Ho, S.H. (1997). Assessing success factors for implementing CE: A case study in Hong Kong electronics industry by AHP. International Journal of Production Economics, 49, 265-283.

Saaty, L. (1999). Fundamentals of the Analytic Network process. ISAHP, 1-14.

Saaty, L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.

Salomon A. P., Marins A. S. & Duduch A. (2007). Multiple decision making applied to the supplier selection for assembly line equipments in an automotive Industry. ISAHP, 1-5.

Sullivan, G., McDonald, N. & Aken, E. V., (2007). Equipment replacement decisions and lean manufacturing. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 18, 255-265.

Journals

MSL Volumes

Keywords

Authors

Countries

Management Science Letters

A multi attribute decision making method for selection of optimal assembly line Pages 65-72 Download PDF

Add Reviews