Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » Utilizing simulation to evaluate production line performance under varying demand conditions

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (51)
  • SCI (51)

IJIEC Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 17 (77)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (26)
    • ▼ Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (77)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(172)
Supply chain management(169)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(114)
Service quality(101)
Artificial intelligence(101)
Competitive advantage(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(94)
Sustainability(93)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(84)
Financial performance(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Organizational performance(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(68)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(41)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(32)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 3 Issue 1 pp. 3-14, 2012

Utilizing simulation to evaluate production line performance under varying demand conditions Pages 3-14 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Thomas McDonald, Eileen Van Akenb, Kimberly Ellib

📋 Author Affiliations:
Thomas McDonald1, Eileen Van Aken ORCID 2, Kimberly Ellib1
1 University of Sothern Indiana, Evansville, IN 47712, 8600 University Blvd, United States, India
2 Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, 250 Durham Hall, United States, N/A
doi 10.5267/j.ijiec.2011.08.011
9 Source: Scopus
Crossref 6 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Bottlenecks, Manufacturing, Simulation

Abstract: Determining how a new production cell will function is problematic and can lead to disastrous results if done incorrectly. Discrete-event simulation can provide information on how a line will function before, during, and after the line is in operation. A simulation model can also provide a visual animation of the line to see how product will flow through the line. This paper discusses the development and analysis of a simulation model of a new manufacturing line. The manufacturing cell is a new motor assembly cell. An analysis of the capability of the line for varying demand levels was conducted for the two main motor types produced on the line. An ARENA® simulation model was developed, verified, and validated to determine the daily production and potential problem areas for the various demand levels. The results show that at all but one demand level, the line is capable of producing to within one unit of customer demand if the required number of workers is present. At the highest demand level, the simulation results suggest that the line is not capable of meeting demand. Additional analysis indicates that multiple workstations could prove problematic with minor fluctuations in demand. Problematic workstations were identified for each assembly area and for the line as a whole.

How to cite this paper
APA: McDonald, T., Akenb, E & Ellib, K. (2012). Utilizing simulation to evaluate production line performance under varying demand conditions. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 3(1), 3-14.
Chicago/Turabian: McDonald, T., Akenb, E & Ellib, K. 2012. "Utilizing simulation to evaluate production line performance under varying demand conditions." International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 3, no. 1 (2012): 3-14.
AMA: McDonald, T., Akenb, E & Ellib, K. Utilizing simulation to evaluate production line performance under varying demand conditions. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 2012;3(1):3-14.

References
Aghaie, A., & Popplewell, K. (1997). Simulation for TQM – the unused tool?. The TQM Magazine, 9(2), 111-116.

Benedettini, O., & Tjahjono, B. (2009). Towards an improved tool to facilitate simulation modeling of complex manufacturing systems. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 43, 191-199.

Chan, F.T.S. (1995). Using simulation to predict system performance: A case study of an electro-phoretic deposition plant. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 6(5), 27-38.

Chan, F.T.S., & Abhary, K. (1996). Design and evaluation of automated cellular manufacturing systems with simulation modelling and AHP approach: a case study. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 7(6), 39-52.

Chan, F.T.S., & Jian, B. (1999). Simulation-aided design of production and assembly cells in an automotive company. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 10(5), 276-283.

Doomun, R., & Jungum, N.V. (2008). Business process modeling, simulation, and reengineering: Call centres. Business Process Management Journal, 14(6), 838-848.

Li, L., (2009). Bottleneck detection of complex manufacturing systems using a data-driven method, International Journal of Production Research, 47(24), 6929-6940.

Li, L., Chang, Q., & Ni, J (2009). Data driven bottleneck detection of manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 47(18), 5019-5036.

Li, J. (2010). Simulation study of coordinating layout change and quality improvement for adapting job shop manufacturing to CONWIP control. International Journal of Production Research, 48(3), 879-900.

McDonald, T., Hafner, A., Van Aken, E.M., & Ellis, K.P. (2002). Analysis of supplier quality and supplier on-time delivery on production line performance, Proceedings of the 2002 Industrial Engineering and Research Conference, Orlando, FL: May 19-22, 2002, Manufacturing Systems Track, CD-ROM.

McDonald, T., Van Aken, E.M., & Rentes, A.F. (2002). Utilizing simulation to enhance value stream mapping: A manufacturing case application. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 5(2), 213-232.
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | 📅 Year: 2012 | 📖 Volume: 3 | 📄 Issue: 1 | 👁️ Views: 2789 | 📊 Crossref: 6

Related Articles:
  • CONWIP card setting in a flow-shop system with a batch production machine
  • Performance measurement of supply chain flexibility using witness
  • A mathematical model in cellular manufacturing system considering subcontracting approach under constraints
  • Virtual cellular manufacturing system based on resource element approach and analyzing its performance over different basic layouts
  • Sufficient conditions for a flexible manufacturing system to be deadlocked

📝 Ready to share your research?

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com