Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Theoretical foundations of organizational problem solving methodologies in Operational Research

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 16 (6)
      • Issue 1 (6)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(110)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Sustainability(81)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Artificial intelligence(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2183)
Indonesia(1290)
India(787)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 3 Issue 6 pp. 1833-1838 , 2013

Theoretical foundations of organizational problem solving methodologies in Operational Research Pages 1833-1838 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Ali Mohaghar, Ahmad Jafarnejad, Seyyed Hasan Ghodsipoor, Mohammad Hasan Maleki

Keywords: Soft Systems, Critical Paradigm, Mixed Methodology, Operational Research, Paradigm

Abstract: Paradigms are some principles and assumptions, which define frameworks and research priorities in each discipline. Many believe that operational research (OR) is not a science and like many other sciences does not have any paradigm. However, since OR is committed to scientific methods, therefore it contains a methodological paradigm. The purpose of this paper is to consider theoretical methodologies in the field of OR. This paper performs a review on the existing literature based on interpretive hermeneutic approach. Based on literature review, the study determines four principles and assumptions for each OR paradigms and a classification of the methods are presented. The results show that OR has four main paradigms and there are many methods in OR fields to tackle a particular problem where each problem belongs to a particular paradigm. In addition, instead of using a particular method in problem situations, we can implement a combination of methodologies.

How to cite this paper
Mohaghar, A., Jafarnejad, A., Ghodsipoor, S & Maleki, M. (2013). Theoretical foundations of organizational problem solving methodologies in Operational Research.Management Science Letters , 3(6), 1833-1838.

Refrences
Blaikie, N. (2007). Approaches to Social Inquiry. 2nd ed., London: Polity Press.
Burrell, G., & Morgan G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London:
Heinemman.

Checkland, P.B. (1985). From optimizing to learning: A development of systems thinking for the
1990s. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36(9), 757-767.

Checkland, P.B. (1999). Systems thinking, systems practice. New York: Wiley.

Checkland, P.B., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. New York: Wiley.

Dando, M.R., & Bennett, P.G. (1981). A Kuhnian Crisis in Management Science?. Journal of the
Operational Research Society, 32, 91-103.

Eden, C., Jones, S., & Sims, D. (1983). Messing about Problems. Oxford: Pergamon.

Jackson, M.C. (2003). Systems thinking: holism for managers. Chichester: Wiley.

Fay, B. (1975). Social Theory and Political Practice. London: Allen & Unwin.

Flood, R., & Jackson, M.C. (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total systems intervention. New York:
Wiley.

Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed., Chicago, University of Chicago
Press.

Kuhn, T.S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd
ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: towards a framework for mixing
methodologies. Omega, 25(5), 489–509.

Mingers, J. (2001). Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information
systems research, 12(3), 240-259.

Munro, I., & Mingers, J. (2002). The use of multimethodology in practice-results of a survey of
practitioners. Journal of the operational research society, 369-378.

Mingers, J. (2003). A classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science
methods. Journal of the Operational Research Society,54(6), 559-570.

Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2004). Problem structuring methods in action. European Journal of
Operational Research, 152(3), 530-554.

Mingers, J., & White, L. (2010). A review if the recent contribution of systems thinking to
operational research and management science. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3),
1147-1161.

Neuman, L. (2006). Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. 3rd ed.,
London: Allyn and Bacon

Paucar-Caceres, A. (2010). Mapping the changes in management science: A review of “soft” OR/MS.
Omega, 38, 46-56.
Pinkard, T. (2002). German Philosophy 1760-1860: The Legacy of Idealism. Cambridge University
Press.
Raitt, R. A. (1979). O.R. and science. Journal of Operations Research, 30, 835-836.

Taket, A. R., & White, L. (2000). Partnership and participation: decision-making in the multiagency
setting. Wiley.
Ulrich, W. (1987). Critical heuristics of social systems design. European Journal of Operational
Research, 31(3), 276-283.

Ulrich, W. (2003). Beyond methodology choice: critical systems thinking as critically systemic
discourse. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(4), 325-342.

Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive
pedagogy. Suny Press.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2013 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 6 | Views: 3519 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • A study on different factors impacting creative habits
  • Political behavior in organizational context: nature, research and paradigm
  • An empirical study on human resource competencies and its relationship with ...
  • Dynamic simulation for effective workforce management in new product develo ...
  • A study on common factors between critical thinking and religious education

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com