Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Enterprise architecture evaluation using architecture framework and UML stereotypes

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (528)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (421)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (293)
  • IJDS (952)
  • JFS (101)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 16 (6)
      • Issue 1 (6)

Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(165)
Vietnam(151)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(115)
Supply chain(112)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(97)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(89)
optimization(87)
Sustainability(86)
Artificial intelligence(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(78)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(66)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(37)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2192)
Indonesia(1311)
Jordan(813)
India(793)
Vietnam(510)
Saudi Arabia(478)
Malaysia(444)
China(231)
United Arab Emirates(226)
Thailand(160)
United States(114)
Ukraine(110)
Turkey(110)
Egypt(106)
Peru(94)
Canada(93)
Morocco(86)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 4 Issue 8 pp. 1781-1788 , 2014

Enterprise architecture evaluation using architecture framework and UML stereotypes Pages 1781-1788 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Narges Shahi, Ali Haroun Abadi, Hadi abooei mehrizi

Keywords: Colored Petri networks, Performance evaluation, Unified modeling language

Abstract: There is an increasing need for enterprise architecture in numerous organizations with complicated systems with various processes. Support for information technology, organizational units whose elements maintain complex relationships increases. Enterprise architecture is so effective that its non-use in organizations is regarded as their institutional inability in efficient information technology management. The enterprise architecture process generally consists of three phases including strategic programing of information technology, enterprise architecture programing and enterprise architecture implementation. Each phase must be implemented sequentially and one single flaw in each phase may result in a flaw in the whole architecture and, consequently, in extra costs and time. If a model is mapped for the issue and then it is evaluated before enterprise architecture implementation in the second phase, the possible flaws in implementation process are prevented. In this study, the processes of enterprise architecture are illustrated through UML diagrams, and the architecture is evaluated in programming phase through transforming the UML diagrams to Petri nets. The results indicate that the high costs of the implementation phase will be reduced.

How to cite this paper
Shahi, N., Abadi, A & mehrizi, H. (2014). Enterprise architecture evaluation using architecture framework and UML stereotypes.Management Science Letters , 4(8), 1781-1788.

Refrences
Afshani, J., Haroon Abadi, A., & Abbasi, M. (2012). Enterprise Assessment using Fuzzy Colored Petri Nets. MA in Computer engineering, software; Islamic Azad University. Khoozestan Science and Technology Branch.

Afshani, J., Harounabadi, A., & Dezfouli, M. (2012). A new model for designing uncertain enterprise architecture. Management Science Letters, 2(2), 689-696.

Bai, X. H. (2008, July). An application with UML object-based PETRI NETS for C4ISR architecture simulation validation. In Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2008 International Conference on (Vol. 4, pp. 2257-2263). IEEE.

Emadi, S., & Shams, F. (2008). From UML component diagram to an executable model based on petri nets. In Information Technology, 2008. ITSim 2008. International Symposium on (Vol. 4, pp. 1-8). IEEE.

Fang, Z., DeLaurentis, D., & Davendralingam, N. (2013). An Approach to Facilitate Decision Making on Architecture Evolution Strategies. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 275-282.

Gehlot, V., & Nigro, C. (2010, December). An introduction to systems modeling and simulation with colored Petri nets. In Simulation Conference (WSC), Proceedings of the 2010 Winter (pp. 104-118). IEEE.

Haroonabadi, A. (2013). Assessment of data systems through Fuzzy Colored Petri Nets. 16th National Annual Conference of Iran’s Computer Group. Sharif University of Technology, Tehran.

Haroonabadi, A., Teshnehlab, M., & Movaghar, A. (2008). A novel method for behavior modeling in uncertain information systems. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 41, 959-966.

Emadi, S., & Shams, F. (2009). Presenting an implementable model of the software architecture for assessing the efficiency. Iranian Computer Scientific Journal, 7(1).

Kim, J. W., Kim, Y. G., Kwon, J. H., Hong, S. H., Song, C. Y., & Baik, D. K. (2005, August). An enterprise architecture framework based on a common information technology domain (EAFIT) for improving interoperability among heterogeneous information systems. In Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, 2005. Third ACIS International Conference on(pp. 198-205). IEEE.

Khamseha, S., Sayyadi, F., & Yektaie, M.H. (2013). A new method for performance evaluation of enterprise architecture using streotypes. Management Science Letters, 3, 2681-2690.

Lima, V., Talhi, C., Mouheb, D., Debbabi, M., Wang, L., & Pourzandi, M. (2009). Formal verification and validation of UML 2.0 sequence diagrams using source and destination of messages. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 254, 143-160.

Saldhana, J., & Shatz, S. M. (2000, July). Uml diagrams to object petri net models: An approach for modeling and analysis. In International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (pp. 103-110).

Shin, M. E., Levis, A. H., & Wagenhals, L. W. (2003, October). Transformation of UML-based system model to design/CPN model for validating system behavior. In Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on the UML/Workshop on Compositional Verification of the UML Models.

Tamm, T., Seddon, P. B., Shanks, G., & Reynolds, P. (2011). How does enterprise architecture add value to organisations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28(1), 141-168.
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2014 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 8 | Views: 2018 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Performance evaluation of enterprise architecture using fuzzy sequence diag ...
  • A new method for performance evaluation of enterprise architecture using st ...
  • A method for enterprise architecture validation with colored Petri Nets
  • Performance evaluation of enterprise architecture with a formal fuzzy model ...
  • A new model for designing uncertain enterprise architecture

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com