Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » A new method for performance evaluation of enterprise architecture using streotypes

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (805)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (562)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2648)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (44)
  • SCI (48)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 16 (11)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Knowledge Management(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (1)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (57)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (39)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Management Science Letters
ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 3 Issue 11 pp. 2681-2690, 2013

A new method for performance evaluation of enterprise architecture using streotypes Pages 2681-2690 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Samaneh Khamseh, Fares Sayyadi, Mohammad Hosein Yektaie

📋 Author Affiliations:
Crossref Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Enterprise Architecture, Execution model, Fuzzy petri nets, Fuzzy UML, Redundancy, Reliability, Stereotypes

Abstract: These days, we see many organizations with extremely complex systems with various processes, organizational units, individuals, and information technology support where there are complex relationships among their various elements. In these organizations, poor architecture reduces efficiency and flexibility. Enterprise architecture, with full description of the functions of information technology in the organization, attempts to reduce the complexity of the most efficient tools to reach organizational objectives. Enterprise architecture can better assess the optimal conditions for achieving organizational goals. For evaluating enterprise architecture, executable model need to be applied. Executable model using a static architectural view to describe necessary documents need to be created. Therefore, to make an executable model, we need a requirement to produce products of the enterprise architecture to create an executable model. In this paper, for the production of an enterprise architecture, object-oriented approach is implemented. We present an algorithm to use stereotypes by considering reliability assessment. The approach taken in this algorithm is to improve the reliability by considering additional components in parallel and using redundancy techniques to maintain the minimum number of components. Furthermore, we implement the proposed algorithm on a case study and the results are compared with previous algorithms.

How to cite this paper
APA: Khamseh, S., Sayyadi, F & Yektaie, M. (2013). A new method for performance evaluation of enterprise architecture using streotypes. Management Science Letters, 3(11), 2681-2690.
Chicago/Turabian: Khamseh, S., Sayyadi, F & Yektaie, M. 2013. "A new method for performance evaluation of enterprise architecture using streotypes." Management Science Letters 3, no. 11 (2013): 2681-2690.
AMA: Khamseh, S., Sayyadi, F & Yektaie, M. A new method for performance evaluation of enterprise architecture using streotypes. Management Science Letters. 2013;3(11):2681-2690.

References
BaI, X.H. (2008). An application with UML object-based Petri Nets for C4ISR architecture simulation validation. proceeding of a seventh international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, Kunming.

Behbahaninejad, P., Harounabadi, A., & Mirabedini, S.J. (2012). Evaluating software architecture using fuzzy formal models. Management Science Letters, 2, 469–476.

Bernardi, S., & Merseguer, J. (2007). Performance Evaluation of UML Design with Stochastic Well-Formed Nets. The Journal of Systems and Software, 80, 1843–1865.

Bostan-Korpeoglu, B., & Yazici, A. (2006). A fuzzy Petri net model for intelligent database. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 8, 112-122.

Deft, R. (1983). Organisation theory and design. New York: West.

Rezaei, R., & Shams, F. (2009). Providing a comprehensive method for developing and evaluating enterprise architecture plan. The first Conference on Enterprise Architecture in Practice, Isfahan, Iran.

Javadpour, R., & Shams, F. (2009). Performance evaluation of electronic city architecture using colored Petri nets. The 2nd Conference on Electronic City, Tehran, May 2009.

Kaisler, S. H., Armour, F., & Valivullah, M. (2005). Enterprise architecting: Critical problems. Proceeding of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on system sciences, 8(8), 224.2.

Ma, Z. (2005). Fuzzy Information Modeling With the UML. Idea Group Publishing, 153-176.

Ma, Z.M., Zhang, F., & Yan, L. (2011a). Fuzzy information modeling in UML class diagram and relational database models. Applied Soft Computing, 11, 4236-4245.

Ma , Z.M. , Yan , L., & Zhang , F. (2011b). Modeling Fuzzy information in UML class diagrams and object oriented database models. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 186, 26-46.

Lindsay, A., Downs, D., & Lunn, K. (2003). Business processes—attempts to find a definition. Information and software technology, 45(15), 1015-1019.

Shin, M. E., Levis, A. H., & Wagenhals, L. W. (2003). Transformation of UML-based system model to design/CPN model for validating system behavior. In Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on the UML/Workshop on Compositional Verification of the UML Models.

Sowa, J. F., & Zachman, J. A. (1992). Extending and Formalizing the Framework for Information Systems Architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 31(3), 590-616.

Wagenhals, L. W., Haider, S., & Levis, A. H. (2003). Synthesizing executable models of object oriented architectures. Systems Engineering, 6(4), 266-300.

Zadeh, L.A. (1983). The role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in Expert System. Fuzzy Sets Systems, 11, 199-227.
  • 85
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2013 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 11 | Views: 2254 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Evaluation of software architecture using fuzzy colored Petri nets
  • A method for enterprise architecture validation with colored Petri Nets
  • Performance evaluation of enterprise architecture with a formal fuzzy model (FPN)
  • A new model for designing uncertain enterprise architecture
  • Evaluating software architecture using fuzzy formal models

📝 Ready to share your research?

Management Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines


Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com