Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Selecting maintenance strategy in a combined cycle power plant: An AHP model utilizing BOCR technique

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2653)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (49)
  • SCI (50)

MSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 16 (16)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Competitive advantage(98)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Management Science Letters
ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 12 Issue 3 pp. 153-164, 2022

Selecting maintenance strategy in a combined cycle power plant: An AHP model utilizing BOCR technique Pages 153-164 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Mohammad Ali Arjomandi, Behzad Mosallanezhad

📋 Author Affiliations:
Arjomandi M.A., Mosallanezhad B.
¹ N/A
doi 10.5267/j.msl.2022.2.004
3 Source: Scopus
Crossref Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Maintenance Strategy Selection, AHP, BOCR, Power Plant Critical Subsystem Preventive Maintena

Abstract: Maintenance philosophies and their activities have always been a major concern in industry. So, every industrial complex needs a clear and comprehensive maintenance plan to keep its equipment reliable and available. In this study, we proposed an AHP model combined with the BOCR method to select the most reliable maintenance strategy for a combined cycle power plant (GTG-HRSG). Five well-known maintenance alternatives including root cause analysis, condition-based maintenance, reliability-centered maintenance, run-to-failure and preventive maintenance are chosen to be evaluated by several experts from various departments of operation, planning and maintenance via three priorities of economic, technical and operation and 30 sub criteria and controls. Then, five different BOCR synthesize methods have been utilized to rank maintenance alternatives. The final result shows that four out of five synthesize methods have ranked RCA as the top maintenance strategy and RCM as second. In one other method, the rank of these two strategies is vice versa.


How to cite this paper
APA: Arjomandi, M & Mosallanezhad, B. (2022). Selecting maintenance strategy in a combined cycle power plant: An AHP model utilizing BOCR technique. Management Science Letters, 12(3), 153-164.
Chicago/Turabian: Arjomandi, M & Mosallanezhad, B. 2022. "Selecting maintenance strategy in a combined cycle power plant: An AHP model utilizing BOCR technique." Management Science Letters 12, no. 3 (2022): 153-164.
AMA: Arjomandi, M & Mosallanezhad, B. Selecting maintenance strategy in a combined cycle power plant: An AHP model utilizing BOCR technique. Management Science Letters. 2022;12(3):153-164.

References
Ahmadi, A., & Mosallanezhad, B. (2018). Using fuzzy FMEA to increase patient safety in fundamental pro-cesses of operating room. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 11(3), 146-166.
Alsyouf, I. (2004). Cost effective maintenance for competitive advantages (Doctoral dissertation, Växjö univer-sity press).
Arjomandi, M. A., Dinmohammadi, F., Mosallanezhad, B., & Shafiee, M. (2021). A fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP-VIKOR analytical model for maintenance strategy selection of safety critical assets. Advances in Mechani-cal Engineering, 13(4), 1687814021994965.
Asuquo, M. P., Wang, J., Zhang, L., & Phylip-Jones, G. (2019). Application of a multiple attribute group deci-sion making (MAGDM) model for selecting appropriate maintenance strategy for marine and offshore ma-chinery operations. Ocean Engineering, 179, 246-260.
Bashiri, M., Badri, H., & Hejazi, T. H. (2011). Selecting optimum maintenance strategy by fuzzy interactive linear assignment method. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(1), 152-164.
Bertolini, M., Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E., & Giacchetta, G. (2009). Development of risk-based inspection and maintenance procedures for an oil refinery. Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 22(2), 244-253.
Bevilacqua, M., & Braglia, M. (2000). The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selec-tion. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 70(1), 71-83.
Borjalilu, N., & Ghambari, M. (2018). Optimal maintenance strategy selection based on a fuzzy analytical net-work process: A case study on a 5-MW powerhouse. International journal of engineering business man-agement, 10, 1847979018776172.
Bouzarour-Amokrane, Y., Tchangani, A., & Pérès, F. (2012). Defining and measuring risk and opportunity in BOCR framework for decision analysis. In 9e International Conference of Modeling and Simulation-MOSIM’12.
Bouzarour-Amokrane, Y., Tchangani, A., & Pérès, F. (2013). Evaluation process in end-of-life systems man-agement using BOCR analysis. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 46(9), 105-110.
Erdoğmuş, Ş., Kapanoglu, M., & Koc, E. (2005). Evaluating high-tech alternatives by using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28(4), 391-399.
Feglar, T., Levy, J. K., Feglar, T., & Feglar, T. (2006). Advances in decision analysis and systems engineering for managing large-scale enterprises in a volatile world: Integrating benefits, opportunities, costs and risks (BOCR) with the business motivation model (BMM). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineer-ing, 15(2), 141-153.
Gedela, R. K., Mohan, K. K., & Prasad, V. K. (2018). Application of BOCR models in service oriented archi-tecture (SOA): study on model validation through quantification for QoS considerations. International Jour-nal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 9(6), 1346-1354.
Lee, A. H. (2009). A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Expert systems with applications, 36(2), 2879-2893.
Liang, C., & Li, Q. (2008). Enterprise information system project selection with regard to BOCR. International journal of Project management, 26(8), 810-820.
Mohan, K. K., Reformat, M. Z., & Pedrycz, W. (2013, June). Interval-based analysis of BOCR (benefits, op-portunities, costs and risks) models evaluated by multiple experts. In 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS) (pp. 244-250). IEEE.
Mosallanezhad, B., Chouhan, V. K., Paydar, M. M., & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M. (2021b). Disaster relief supply chain design for personal protection equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Applied Soft Compu-ting, 112, 107809.
Mosallanezhad, B., Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., & Triki, C. (2021a). Shrimp closed-loop supply chain network de-sign. Soft Computing, 25(11), 7399-7422.
Nezami, F. G., & Yildirim, M. B. (2013). A sustainability approach for selecting maintenance strate-gy. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 6(4), 332-343.
Özcan, E., Yumuşak, R., & Eren, T. (2019). Risk based maintenance in the hydroelectric power plants. Energies, 12(8), 1502.
Saaty, T. L. (2004). Fundamentals of the analytic network process—multiple networks with benefits, costs, op-portunities and risks. journal of systems science and systems engineering, 13(3), 348-379.
Saaty, T. L., & Ozdemir, M. (2003). Negative priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and computer modelling, 37(9-10), 1063-1075.
Shafiee, M. (2015). Maintenance strategy selection problem: an MCDM overview. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering.
Tabatabaee, S., Mahdiyar, A., Durdyev, S., Mohandes, S. R., & Ismail, S. (2019). An assessment model of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks of green roof installation: A multi criteria decision making ap-proach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117956.
Tahmasdi, J., Ahmadi, A., & Mosallanezhad, B. (2021). Uncovering the hidden relation between air pollution and ischemic heart disease: Experience from Tehran. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 13(3), 216-242.
Wijnmalen, D. J. (2007). Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP–ANP: A critical validation. Mathematical and computer modelling, 46(7-8), 892-905.
Zaranezhad, A., Mahabadi, H. A., & Dehghani, M. R. (2019). Development of prediction models for repair and maintenance-related accidents at oil refineries using artificial neural network, fuzzy system, genetic algo-rithm, and ant colony optimization algorithm. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 131, 331-348.
Zhao, B., Chen, H., Gao, D., & Xu, L. (2020). Risk assessment of refinery unit maintenance based on fuzzy second generation curvelet neural network. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59(3), 1823-1831.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Management Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2022 | 📖 Volume: 12 | 📄 Issue: 3 | 👁️ Views: 1468 | 📊 Crossref:

Related Articles:
  • Which contractor selection methodology?
  • Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
  • Selecting the most appropriate maintenance strategies using fuzzy Analytic Network Process: A case study of Saipa vehicle industry
  • A BOCR and Fuzzy AHP method for identification and prioritization of carpet industry strategies
  • An improved MCDM method for maintenance approach selection: A case study of auto industry

📝 Ready to share your research?

Management Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com