Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » The evaluation of supply chain performance in the Oil Products Distribution Company, using information technology indicators and fuzzy TOPSIS technique

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (805)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (562)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2648)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (44)
  • SCI (48)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 16 (11)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Knowledge Management(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (1)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (57)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (39)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Management Science Letters
ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 8 Issue 8 pp. 835-848, 2018

The evaluation of supply chain performance in the Oil Products Distribution Company, using information technology indicators and fuzzy TOPSIS technique Pages 835-848 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Daryosh Mohamadi Janaki, Hamidreza Izadbakhsh, Seyed Morteza Hatefi

📋 Author Affiliations:
D. Mohamadi Janaki¹, H. Izadbakhsh¹, S.M. Hatefi²
¹ Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
² Faculty of Engineering, Shahrekord University, Rahbar Boulevard, PO Box 115, Shahrekord, Iran
doi 10.5267/j.msl.2018.6.004
Crossmark
20 Source: Scopus
Crossref 9 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Supply chain management, Information sharing, Fuzzy TOPSIS technique

Abstract: Information Technology (IT) plays an essential role on development of effective supply chain planning and it can improve the supply chain performance, either directly or indirectly. As a national industry, the National Iranian Oil Products Distribution Company involves a large number of organizations within its supply chain. Therefore, this descriptive-survey uses information sharing indicators, fuzzy TOPSIS technique based on managers and expert opinions to evaluate and to rank some oil products distribution companies. Data are analyzed and the results show that Oil Products Distribution Company of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari received the highest rank and Farsan maintained the lowest rank compared with other regional companies.

How to cite this paper
APA: Janaki, D., Izadbakhsh, H & Hatefi, S. (2018). The evaluation of supply chain performance in the Oil Products Distribution Company, using information technology indicators and fuzzy TOPSIS technique. Management Science Letters, 8(8), 835-848.
Chicago/Turabian: Janaki, D., Izadbakhsh, H & Hatefi, S. 2018. "The evaluation of supply chain performance in the Oil Products Distribution Company, using information technology indicators and fuzzy TOPSIS technique." Management Science Letters 8, no. 8 (2018): 835-848.
AMA: Janaki, D., Izadbakhsh, H & Hatefi, S. The evaluation of supply chain performance in the Oil Products Distribution Company, using information technology indicators and fuzzy TOPSIS technique. Management Science Letters. 2018;8(8):835-848.

References
Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International journal of operations & pro-duction management, 19(3), 275-292.
Breen, L. & Crawford, H. (2005). Improving the pharmaceutical supply chain. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(6), 572-590.
Black, G. (2002). Analysis of project management survey data, Process quality Associated, INC., Septem-ber 4, 2002. Laudon, K. and Laudon, J. (2002). Information systems management: organization and technology. Prentice Hall.
Benton, W.C. & Maloni, M. (2002). Relationship performance in the automotive supply chain. Fisher Col-lege of Business, The Ohio State University.
Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G., Shaban, A., & Tronci, M. (2015). The impact of information sharing on or-dering policies to improve supply chain performances. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 82, 127-142.
Chakraborty, S., Kumar, V & Ramakrishnan, K. (2018). Selection of the all-time best World XI Test cricket team using the TOPSIS method. Decision Science Letters, 8(1), 95-108.
Díaz-Mateus, Y., Forero, B., López-Ospina, H., & Zambrano-Rey, G. (2018). Pricing and lot sizing opti-mization in a two-echelon supply chain with a constrained Logit demand function. International Jour-nal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 9(2), 205-220.
Estampe, D., Lamouri, S., Paris, J. L., & Brahim-Djelloul, S. (2013). A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models. International Journal of Production Economics, 142(2), 247-258.
Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. (2009). Modeling and analysis of build-to-order supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 195(2), 319-334.
Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. (2004). Information systems in supply chain integration and manage-ment. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 269-295.
Gazanfari, M., Reyazi, A., & Kazemi, M. (2000). Supply Chain Management. Monthly Scientific-Educational Tadbir, 117.
Hwang, C-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Hosoda, T., Disney, S. M., & Gavirneni, S. (2015). The impact of information sharing, random yield, cor-relation, and lead times in closed loop supply chains. European Journal of Operational Re-search, 246(3), 827-836.
Lee, H. L., So, K. C., & Tang, C. S. (2000). The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management science, 46(5), 626-643.
Li, G., Huang, F., Cheng, T. E., & Ji, P. (2015). Competition between manufacturer's online customization channel and conventional retailer. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 62(2), 150-157.
Lima-Junior, F. R., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2016). Combining SCOR® model and fuzzy TOPSIS for sup-plier evaluation and management. International Journal of Production Economics, 174, 128-141.
Mittal, K., Tewari, P., & Khanduja, D. (2018). On the fuzzy evaluation of measurement system analysis in a manufacturing and process industry environment: A comparative study. Management Science Let-ters, 8(4), 201-216.
Perçin, S. (2008). Use of fuzzy AHP for evaluating the benefits of information-sharing decisions in a supply chain. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21(3), 263-284.
Piotrowicz, W., & Cuthbertson, R. (2015). Performance measurement and metrics in supply chains: an exploratory study. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(8), 1068-1091.
Qin, F., Mai, F., Fry, M. J., & Raturi, A. S. (2016). Supply-chain performance anomalies: Fairness con-cerns under private cost information. European Journal of Operational Research, 252(1), 170-182.
Rached, M., Bahroun, Z., & Campagne, J. P. (2015). Assessing the value of information sharing and its impact on the performance of the various partners in supply chains. Computers & Industrial Engineer-ing, 88, 237-253.
Raghunathan, S. (2003). Impact of demand correlation on the value of and incentives for information sharing in a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(3), 634-649.
Ross, A., & Droge, C. (2002). An integrated benchmarking approach to distribution center performance using DEA modeling. Journal of Operations Management, 20(1), 19-32.
Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP).
Sadjadi, S. J., Naeij, J., Shavandi, H., & Makui, A. (2016). Equilibrium pricing and ordering policies in a two-echelon supply chain in the presence of strategic customers. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 88(2), 1127-1150.
Samizadeh, R., & Hosaini, R. (2010). Supply Chain Management and Information Technology. Second National Conference on Information Technology, Isfahan, July.
Slone, R. E., Mentzer, J. T., & Dittmann, J. P. (2007). Are you the weakest link in your company's supply chain?. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 116.
Tsai, W. H., & Chou, W. C. (2009). Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Expert systems with applications, 36(2), 1444-1458.
Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R., & Nair, A. (2006). Vendor performance with supply risk: A chance-constrained DEA approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2), 212-222.
Vishal, V.J. (2015). The roles of information technology supply chain management. International Jour-nal of Management Research & Review, 5(6), 369-379.
Welker, G. A., van der Vaart, T., & van Donk, D. P. (2008). The influence of business conditions on sup-ply chain information-sharing mechanisms: a study among supply chain links of SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(2), 706-720.
Zhou, M., Dan, B., Songxuan M., * Zhang, X. (2016). Supply chain coordination with information shar-ing. European Journal of Operational Research, 100(2), 1–18.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2018 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 8 | Views: 2533 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Supply chain coordination via a two-part tariff contract with price and sales effort dependent demand
  • Coordination of a three-level supply chain under disruption using profit sharing and return policy contracts
  • An empirical investigation for measuring the performance of supply chain operation: A case study of healthcare industry
  • Evaluating performance of supply chain based on network data envelopment analysis
  • Supply chain quality management

📝 Ready to share your research?

Management Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines


Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com