Utilizing an ANP framework for prioritizing effective criteria on industrial clusters'  formation

Abstract: Clustering plays an important role on developing industries, since business units can take advantage of many existing industries for trouble shooting or sharing their experiences to increase efficiency. One of the primary concerns for developing clustering is to identify and remove important barriers. In this paper, we gather experts' feedbacks on forming clustering in Iran's industries and, using analytical network process, we prioritize the important factors and provide some necessary guidelines to develop clustering. The results of this paper indicate that the existence of a supplier network is the most important factor, followed by the existence of competition between operational units, existence of high-risk investors, existence of suitable infrastructures. There are also other less important criteria including the existence of flexibility, suitable technology and competition, governmental regularities, social background, trust, etc.

How to cite this paper

 Monfared, J., Jannatifar, H & Moradi, J. (2012). Utilizing an ANP framework for prioritizing effective criteria on industrial clusters'  formation.Management Science Letters , 2(2), 571-578.

Refrences

Altenburg, T., & Meyer–Stamer, J. (1999). How to promote clusters: Policy experience from Latin America. World Development, 27(9), 1693-1713.

Boari, C. (2001). Industrial clusters, focal firms and economic dynamism: A perspective from Italy. The World Bank.

Chung, S.H., Lee, A.H.I., & Pearn, W.L. (2005). Analytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator. International Journal of Production Economics, 96 (1), 15–36.

Enright, M. J. (1996). Regional Clusters and Economic Development: A Research Agenda. In Business New works: Prospects for Regional Development. Edited by U.H. staber Et Al., Berlin, Walter De Gruyter.

Jharkharia, S., & Shankar, R. (2007). Selection of logistics service provider: an analytic network process (ANP) approach. Omega 35, 274–289.

Nadvi, K. (1994). Industrial District Experiences in Developing Countries in UNCTAD, Technological Dynamism in Industrial Districts: An Alternative Approach to Industrialization in Developing Countries. New York and Geneva: United Nations.

NGA: National Governors Association (2002); A Governors Guide to Cluster – Based Economic Development. Washington, D.C. 20001-1512 WWW.nga.org.

Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage, Macmillan, New York, Free Press.

Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Basic Books.

Porter, M.E. (1995). Competitive Advantage of the Inner City. Harvard Business Review, 55-71.

Porter, M.E. (1997). New strategies for Inner city economic. Development, Economic Development Quarterly, 11(1), 11-27.

Porter, M.E. (1998). Clusters and the New Economic of Competition. Harvard Business Review (November / December).

Porter, M. E. (2001) Clusters of Innovation: Regional Foundations of U.S. Competitiveness, Council on Competitiveness, Washington, Dc .Super Discussion Paper No. 00-39.

Porter, M.E, (2003a). The Economic Performance of Regions. Regional Studies, 37(6-7), 549-678.

Porter, M.E, (2003b). Building the Microeconomic Foundations of Competitiveness. in the Global Competitiveness Report 2002-2003, World Economic Forum, New York: Oxford University Press.

Pyke, F., & Sengenberger, W. eds (1992) Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, Geneva: International Institute for Labor Studies (ILO).

Rabellotti, R. (1997). External Economies and Cooperation in Industrial Districts: A comparison of Italy and Mexico. Macmillan, London.

Rabellotti, R., & Schmitz, H. (1997). The internal heterogeneity of industrial districts in Italy, Brazil and Mexico. IDS Working Paper, No. 59, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, forthcoming in Regional Studies.

Saaty, T.L. (1994). Fundamentals of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Ave., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Saaty, T.L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications. ISBN 0-9620317- 9-8.

Saaty, T.L. (1999). Fundamentals of the analytic network process. ISAHP 1999, Kobe, Japan, August 12-14.

Saaty, T.L. (2001). Decision making with the analytic network process (ANP) and its Super Decisions Software: The National Missile Defense (NMD) Example, ISAHP 2001 Proceedings, Bern, Switzerland, August, 2-4.

Saaty, T.L. (2004). Fundamentals of the analytic network process: Dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, published at Tsinghua University, Beijing, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 129-157.

Saaty, T.L. (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications. ISBN 1-888603-06-2.

Saaty, T.L. (2006). Rank from Comparisons and from Ratings in the Analytic Hierarchy/ Network Processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 168, 557-570.

Saaty, T.L. (2008). The Analytic Network Process. Iranian Journal of Operations Research, 1(1), 1-27.

Sarkis, J. (2003). Quantitative models for performance measurement systems alternate considerations. International Journal of Production Economics. 86 (1), 81–90.

Schmitz, H. (1995). Collective Efficiency: Growth Path for Small-Scale Industry. Journal of Development Studies, 31(4), 529–66.

Schmitz, H., & Nadvi, K. (1999). Clustering and Industrialization: Introduction. World Development, 27(9), 1503–1514.

Scott, A. (1996). Regional motors of the global economy. Futures, 28 (5), 391-411.