Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for selection of wind turbine service technicians

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

MSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 16 (21)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Management Science Letters
ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 6 Issue 1 pp. 1-18, 2016

Fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for selection of wind turbine service technicians Pages 1-18 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Goutam Kumar Bos, Nikhil Chandra Chatterjee

📋 Author Affiliations:
Goutam Kumar Bose ORCID 1, Nikhil Chandra Chatterjee ORCID 2
1 Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Haldia Institute of Technology, Haldia, West Bengal University of Technology, West Bengal, India
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Saroj Mohan Institute of Technology, Guptipara, West Bengal University of Technology, West Bengal, India
doi 10.5267/j.msl.2015.12.004
9 Source: Scopus
Crossref 7 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: ARAS-F, Fuzzy Set Theory, MCDM, MOORA – F, Multi Criteria Group Decision making (MCGDM), Wind Turbine Service Technicians (Wind techs)

Abstract: This research paper is aimed to present a fuzzy Hybrid Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methodology for selecting employees. The present study aspires to present the hybrid approach of Fuzzy multiple MCDM techniques with tactical viewpoint to support the recruitment process of wind turbine service technicians. The methodology is based on the application of Fuzzy ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) and Fuzzy MOORA (Multi-Objective Optimization on basis of Ratio Analysis) which are integrated through group decision making (GDM) method in the model for selection of wind turbine service technicians’ ranking. Here a group of experts from different fields of expertise are engaged to finalize the decision. Series of tests are conducted regarding physical fitness, technical written test, practical test along with general interview and medical examination to facilitate the final selection using the above techniques. In contrast to single decision making approaches, the proposed group decision making model efficiently supports the wind turbine service technicians ranking process. The effectiveness of the proposed approach manifest from the case study of service technicians required for the maintenance department of wind power plant using Fuzzy ARAS and Fuzzy MOORA. This set of potential technicians is evaluated based on five main criteria.

How to cite this paper
APA: Bos, G & Chatterjee, N. (2016). Fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for selection of wind turbine service technicians. Management Science Letters, 6(1), 1-18.
Chicago/Turabian: Bos, G & Chatterjee, N. 2016. "Fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for selection of wind turbine service technicians." Management Science Letters 6, no. 1 (2016): 1-18.
AMA: Bos, G & Chatterjee, N. Fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for selection of wind turbine service technicians. Management Science Letters. 2016;6(1):1-18.

References
Afshari, A., Mojahed, M., & Yusuff, R.M. (2010). Simple Additive Weighting approach to Personnel Selection problem, International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(5), 511-515.

Agarwal, R. (2013). Selection of IT personnel through hybrid multi-attributes AHP-FLP approach. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering, 2(6), 11-17.

Bale?entis, A., Bale?entis, T., & Brauers, W. K. M. (2012). MultiMOORA-FG: A multi-objective decision making method for linguistic reasoning with an application to personnel selection. Informatica, 23(2), 173–190.

Blanco, M.I., & Rodrigues, G. (2009), Direct employment in the wind energy sector: An EU study,.Energy Policy, 37(8), 2847–2857.

Bobrow, W. (2003). Personnel Selection and Assessment. The California Psychologist, 14-15.

Chatterjee, N. C., & Bose, G. K. (2013). Selection of vendors for wind farm under fuzzy MCDM environment. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 4(4), 535 – 546.

Chen, C.T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1-9.

Chen, M. F., Tzeng, G. H., & Tang, T. I. (2005). Fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of expatriate assignments. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 4(02), 277-296.

Chen, C. T., Pai, P. F., & Hung, W. Z. (2011). Applying and Knowledge Map in Personnel Selection. Asia Pacific Management Review, 16(4), 491-502.

Dadelo, S., Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E., & Dadeliene, R. (2012). Multiple Criteria Assessment of Elite Security Personal on the Basis of ARAS and Expert Methods. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 46(4), 65-88.

Datta, S., Beriha, G. S., Patnaik, B., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2009). Use of compromise ranking method for supervisor selection: A multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach. International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 1(1), 7-13.

Ding, J. F. (2012). Using fuzzy MCDM model to select middle managers for global shipping carrier-based logistics service pProviders. WSEAS Transactions On Systems, 3(11), 85-94.

Dursun, M., & Karsak, E. E. (2010). A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 4324–4330.

El-Santawy, M. F. (2012). A VIKOR method for solving personnel training selection problem. International Journal of Computing Science, 1(2), 9-12.

Gibney, R., & Shang, J. (2007). Decision making in academia: A case of the dean selection process. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 46(7-8), 1030–1040.

Güng?r, Z., Serhadl?o?lu, G., & Kesen, S. E. (2009). A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem, Applied Soft Computing, 9, 641–646.

Haghighi, M., Zowghi, M., & Ansari, M. (2012). A fuzzy multiple attribute decision making (MADM) approach for employee evaluation and selection process. American Journal of Scientific Research, 58, 75-84.

Hamilton, J., & Liming, D. (2010). Careers in wind energy. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1-18.

Karsak, E. E. (2001). Personnel selection using a fuzzy MCDM approach based on ideal and anti-ideal solutions. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 507, 393–402.

Kelemenis, A.M., & Askounis, D. Th. (2009). An extension of fuzzy TOPSIS for personnel selection, In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics San Antonio, 4704-4709.

Kelemenis, A, Ergazakis, K., & Askounis, D. (2011), Support managers’ selection using an extension of fuzzy TOPSIS, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2774–2782.

Ker?ulien?. V., & Turskis, Z. (2011), Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(4), 645-666.

Liang, J., & Pang, J. (2012). Evaluation of the results of multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic information, Omega, 40, 294–301.

Liang, G. S., & Wang, M. J. J. (1994). Personnel selection using fuzzy MCDM algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research, 78(1), 22–33.

Pramanik, S., & Mukhopadhyaya, D. (2011). Grey Relational Analysis based Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-criteria Group Decision-making Approach for Teacher Selection in Higher Education. International Journal of Computer Applications, 34(10), 21-29.

Ramadan, M. Z. (2009). Effective staff selection tool: Fuzzy numbers and memetic algorithm based approach. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 9(10), 54-65.

Robertson, I. T., & Smith, B. (2001). Personnel selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 441–472.

Rouyendegh, B.D., & Erkan, T.E., (2013). An Application of the Fuzzy ELECTRE method for academic staff selection. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(2), 107–115.

Turskis, Z., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2010). A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS–F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location. Transport, 25(4), 423–432.

Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.

Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Tamosaitiene, J., & Marina, V. (2008). Selection of Construction Project Managers by Applying COPRAS-G Method, In The 8th International Conference of Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication – 2008, 344-350.

Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), 159–172.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Management Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2016 | 📖 Volume: 6 | 📄 Issue: 1 | 👁️ Views: 2407 | 📊 Crossref: 7

Related Articles:
  • Teachers’ recruitment process via MCDM methods: A case study in Bangladesh
  • An IF-DEMATEL-AHP based on Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers (TIFNs)
  • A fuzzy AHP approach for employee recruitment
  • Selection of vendors for wind farm under fuzzy MCDM environment
  • A COPRAS-F base multi-criteria group decision making approach for site selection of wind farm

📝 Ready to share your research?

Management Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com