Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for selection of wind turbine service technicians

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 16 (6)
      • Issue 1 (6)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(110)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Sustainability(81)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Artificial intelligence(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2183)
Indonesia(1290)
India(787)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 6 Issue 1 pp. 1-18 , 2016

Fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for selection of wind turbine service technicians Pages 1-18 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Goutam Kumar Bos, Nikhil Chandra Chatterjee

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2015.12.004

Keywords: ARAS-F, Fuzzy Set Theory, MCDM, MOORA – F, Multi Criteria Group Decision making (MCGDM), Wind Turbine Service Technicians (Wind techs)

Abstract: This research paper is aimed to present a fuzzy Hybrid Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methodology for selecting employees. The present study aspires to present the hybrid approach of Fuzzy multiple MCDM techniques with tactical viewpoint to support the recruitment process of wind turbine service technicians. The methodology is based on the application of Fuzzy ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) and Fuzzy MOORA (Multi-Objective Optimization on basis of Ratio Analysis) which are integrated through group decision making (GDM) method in the model for selection of wind turbine service technicians’ ranking. Here a group of experts from different fields of expertise are engaged to finalize the decision. Series of tests are conducted regarding physical fitness, technical written test, practical test along with general interview and medical examination to facilitate the final selection using the above techniques. In contrast to single decision making approaches, the proposed group decision making model efficiently supports the wind turbine service technicians ranking process. The effectiveness of the proposed approach manifest from the case study of service technicians required for the maintenance department of wind power plant using Fuzzy ARAS and Fuzzy MOORA. This set of potential technicians is evaluated based on five main criteria.

How to cite this paper
Bos, G & Chatterjee, N. (2016). Fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for selection of wind turbine service technicians.Management Science Letters , 6(1), 1-18.

Refrences
Afshari, A., Mojahed, M., & Yusuff, R.M. (2010). Simple Additive Weighting approach to Personnel Selection problem, International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(5), 511-515.

Agarwal, R. (2013). Selection of IT personnel through hybrid multi-attributes AHP-FLP approach. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering, 2(6), 11-17.

Bale?entis, A., Bale?entis, T., & Brauers, W. K. M. (2012). MultiMOORA-FG: A multi-objective decision making method for linguistic reasoning with an application to personnel selection. Informatica, 23(2), 173–190.

Blanco, M.I., & Rodrigues, G. (2009), Direct employment in the wind energy sector: An EU study,.Energy Policy, 37(8), 2847–2857.

Bobrow, W. (2003). Personnel Selection and Assessment. The California Psychologist, 14-15.

Chatterjee, N. C., & Bose, G. K. (2013). Selection of vendors for wind farm under fuzzy MCDM environment. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 4(4), 535 – 546.

Chen, C.T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1-9.

Chen, M. F., Tzeng, G. H., & Tang, T. I. (2005). Fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of expatriate assignments. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 4(02), 277-296.

Chen, C. T., Pai, P. F., & Hung, W. Z. (2011). Applying and Knowledge Map in Personnel Selection. Asia Pacific Management Review, 16(4), 491-502.

Dadelo, S., Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E., & Dadeliene, R. (2012). Multiple Criteria Assessment of Elite Security Personal on the Basis of ARAS and Expert Methods. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 46(4), 65-88.

Datta, S., Beriha, G. S., Patnaik, B., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2009). Use of compromise ranking method for supervisor selection: A multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach. International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 1(1), 7-13.

Ding, J. F. (2012). Using fuzzy MCDM model to select middle managers for global shipping carrier-based logistics service pProviders. WSEAS Transactions On Systems, 3(11), 85-94.

Dursun, M., & Karsak, E. E. (2010). A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 4324–4330.

El-Santawy, M. F. (2012). A VIKOR method for solving personnel training selection problem. International Journal of Computing Science, 1(2), 9-12.

Gibney, R., & Shang, J. (2007). Decision making in academia: A case of the dean selection process. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 46(7-8), 1030–1040.

Güng?r, Z., Serhadl?o?lu, G., & Kesen, S. E. (2009). A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem, Applied Soft Computing, 9, 641–646.

Haghighi, M., Zowghi, M., & Ansari, M. (2012). A fuzzy multiple attribute decision making (MADM) approach for employee evaluation and selection process. American Journal of Scientific Research, 58, 75-84.

Hamilton, J., & Liming, D. (2010). Careers in wind energy. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1-18.

Karsak, E. E. (2001). Personnel selection using a fuzzy MCDM approach based on ideal and anti-ideal solutions. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 507, 393–402.

Kelemenis, A.M., & Askounis, D. Th. (2009). An extension of fuzzy TOPSIS for personnel selection, In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics San Antonio, 4704-4709.

Kelemenis, A, Ergazakis, K., & Askounis, D. (2011), Support managers’ selection using an extension of fuzzy TOPSIS, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2774–2782.

Ker?ulien?. V., & Turskis, Z. (2011), Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(4), 645-666.

Liang, J., & Pang, J. (2012). Evaluation of the results of multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic information, Omega, 40, 294–301.

Liang, G. S., & Wang, M. J. J. (1994). Personnel selection using fuzzy MCDM algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research, 78(1), 22–33.

Pramanik, S., & Mukhopadhyaya, D. (2011). Grey Relational Analysis based Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-criteria Group Decision-making Approach for Teacher Selection in Higher Education. International Journal of Computer Applications, 34(10), 21-29.

Ramadan, M. Z. (2009). Effective staff selection tool: Fuzzy numbers and memetic algorithm based approach. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 9(10), 54-65.

Robertson, I. T., & Smith, B. (2001). Personnel selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 441–472.

Rouyendegh, B.D., & Erkan, T.E., (2013). An Application of the Fuzzy ELECTRE method for academic staff selection. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(2), 107–115.

Turskis, Z., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2010). A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS–F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location. Transport, 25(4), 423–432.

Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.

Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Tamosaitiene, J., & Marina, V. (2008). Selection of Construction Project Managers by Applying COPRAS-G Method, In The 8th International Conference of Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication – 2008, 344-350.

Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), 159–172.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2016 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 1 | Views: 2222 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Teachers’ recruitment process via MCDM methods: A case study in Bangladesh
  • An IF-DEMATEL-AHP based on Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers (TIFNs)
  • A fuzzy AHP approach for employee recruitment
  • Selection of vendors for wind farm under fuzzy MCDM environment
  • A COPRAS-F base multi-criteria group decision making approach for site sele ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com