Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » A DEMATEL method for identifying supply chain complexity drivers of footwear industry

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2653)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (49)
  • SCI (50)

MSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 16 (16)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Competitive advantage(98)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(84)
Financial performance(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Management Science Letters
ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 15 Issue 4 pp. 167-176, 2025

A DEMATEL method for identifying supply chain complexity drivers of footwear industry Pages 167-176 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Tekalign Lemma Woldassilas, Hirpa G. Lemu, Endalkachew Mosisa Gutema

📋 Author Affiliations:
Tekalign Lemma Woldassilas1, Hirpa G. Lemu2, Endalkachew Mosisa Gutema1
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia
2 Department of Mechanical and Structural Engineering and Materials Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway
doi 10.5267/j.msl.2025.1.001
Crossref Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Supply chain complexity, Drivers, Footwear, DEMATEL approach

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the key drivers of supply chain complexity in the footwear industry business sector. After conducting extensive literature review and consultation with experts, complexity drivers in the context of the footwear business sector were identified. The content validity of the identified drivers was checked by 13 experts using content validity ratio (CVR), which were used as the basis to select 20 key Supply Chain complexity drivers. Using a multi-criteria decision-making DEMATEL approach the cause and effect drivers were investigated. The findings of the study investigated 12 cause and 8 effect drivers in the footwear sector. Among the cause drivers, four linkage drivers that have strong driving power and dependency were identified. This study is the first in the developing county footwear business sector using DEMATEL approach to identify the key supply chain complexity drivers and their interrelationship. The study identified complexity drivers in the context of the footwear business sector that were not explored before in the existing studies. The outcome of this study will help SC complexity decision-makers in that case sector to control and manage the cause and effect drivers and thus improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their SC performance.

How to cite this paper
APA: Woldassilas, T., Lemu, H & Gutema, E. (2025). A DEMATEL method for identifying supply chain complexity drivers of footwear industry. Management Science Letters, 15(4), 167-176.
Chicago/Turabian: Woldassilas, T., Lemu, H & Gutema, E. 2025. "A DEMATEL method for identifying supply chain complexity drivers of footwear industry." Management Science Letters 15, no. 4 (2025): 167-176.
AMA: Woldassilas, T., Lemu, H & Gutema, E. A DEMATEL method for identifying supply chain complexity drivers of footwear industry. Management Science Letters. 2025;15(4):167-176.

References
Abbasi, M., & Varga, L. (2022). Steering supply chains from a complex systems perspective. European Journal of Management Studies, 27(1), 5-38.
Alkan, B., & Harrison, R. (2019). A virtual engineering based approach to verify structural complexity of component-based automation systems in early design phase. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 53, 18–31
Blecker, T., Kersten, W., & Meyer, C. M. (2005). Development of an approach for analyzing supply chain complexity. In Mass customization: concepts–tools–realization. proceedings of the international mass customization meet-ing (pp. 47-59).
Bode, C., & Wagner, S.M. (2015). Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions. Journal of Operations Management, 36, 215-228
Bozarth, C.C., Warsing, D.P., Flynn, B.B., & Flynn, E.J. (2009). The impact of supply chain complexity on manufactur-ing plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, 27(1), 78-93
Bugra, A., & Robert, H. (2019). A virtual engineering based approach to verify structural complexity of component-based automation systems in early design phase. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 53, 18–31.
Chand, P., Thakkar, J. J., & Ghosh, K. K. (2018). Analysis of supply chain complexity drivers for Indian mining equip-ment manufacturing companies combining SAP-LAP and AHP. Resources Policy, 59, 389-410.
Cheng, C.-Y., Chen, T.-L., & Chen, Y.-Y. (2014). An analysis of the structural complexity of supply chain networks. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(9-10), 2328-2344
Chhetri, P., Hashemi, A., Lau, K. H., & Lim, M. K. (2022). Aligning supply chain complexity with product demand and design characteristics. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 25(8), 1137-1163.
Choi, T. Y., & Krause, D. R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: implications for transaction costs, risks, re-sponsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 637–652
Choi, T. Y., & Krause, D. R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, re-sponsiveness, and innovation. Journal of operations management, 24(5), 637-652.
de Leeuw, S., Grotenhuis, R., & van Goor, A. R. (2013). Assessing complexity of supply chains: evidence from whole-salers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(8), 960-980.
De leeuw, S., Grotenhuis, R., & van Goor, A.R. (2013). Assessing complexity of supply chains: evidence from whole-salers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(8), 960-980.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (2003). The challenge of complexity in global manufacturing: Critical trends in supply chain management. In Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Global Benchmark Study Report. Filiz, I. (2010). An entropy-based approach for measuring complexity in supply chains. International Journal of Pro-duction Research, 48(12), 3681-3696.
Gerschberger, M., Engelhardt‐Nowitzki, C., Kummer, S., & Staberhofer, F. (2012). A model to determine complexity in supply networks. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(8), 1015-1037.
Hendryk, D., Kirstin S., & Dirk P. (2018). Burden or blessing in disguise: interactions in supply chain complexity. In-ternational Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(2), 314-332
Iman, H., Abdolreza, S., Hamed, A., & Kazem M. (2015). Studying the impact of supply chain complexity on competi-tiveness capabilities. Journal of Scientific Research and Development, 2(6), 205-210
Isik, F. (2010). An entropy-based approach for measuring complexity in supply chains. International Journal of Produc-tion Research, 48(12), 37-41
Jacobs, M. A., & Swink, M. (2011). Product portfolio architectural complexity and operational performance: Incorporat-ing the roles of learning and fixed assets. Journal of Operations Management, 29(7–8), 677–691
Kavilal E.G., Prasanna Venkatesan, S., & Sanket, J. (2018). An integrated interpretive structural modeling and a graph-theoretic approach for measuring the supply chain complexity in the Indian automotive industry. Journal of Manu-facturing Technology Management, 29(3), 478-514.
Piya, S., Shamsuzzoha, A., & Khadem, M. (2020). An approach for analysing supply chain complexity drivers through interpretive structural modelling. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(4), 311-336.
Serdarasan, S. (2013). A review of supply chain complexity drivers. Computers & Industrial
Engineering, 66(3), 533-540
Seyda S. (2013). A review of supply chain complexity drivers. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66, 533-540.
Seyoum, E., Paolo, T., & Pablo F. (2017). Effectiveness of Resilience Capabilities in Mitigating Disruptions: Leverag-ing on Supply Chain Structural Complexity. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(6), 506–521, 2017
Stock, G. N., Greis, N. P., & Kasarda, J. D. (2000). Enterprise logistics and supply chain structure: The role of fit. Jour-nal of Operations Management, 18(5), 531 -547
Vachon, S., & Klassen, R.D. (2002). An exploratory investigation of the effects of supply chain complexity on delivery performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(3), 218-230
Wilson, A. P., & Perumal, P. (2009). Waging war on complexity costs: Reshape your cost structure, free up cash flows and boost productivity by attacking process, product and organizational. McGraw Hill Professional, (2009)
Wu, Y., Frizelle, G., & Efstathiou, J. (2007). A study on the cost of operational complexity in
customer – supplier systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(1), 217-229
Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in medicine jour-nal, 11(2), 49-54.
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Management Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2025 | 📖 Volume: 15 | 📄 Issue: 4 | 👁️ Views: 702 | 📊 Crossref:

Related Articles:
  • Coordination and optimization decision of assembly building supply chain under supply disruption risk
  • The effect of supply chain risk management on supply chain resilience: The intervening part of Internet-of-Things
  • Factors affecting supply chain integration and customer satisfaction
  • Planning for disruptions in supply chain networks
  • Application of factor analysis for agile supply chain classification: A case study on the Iranian automotive parts supplier (SAPKO)

📝 Ready to share your research?

Management Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com