Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Assessing intellectual capital management by fuzzy TOPSIS

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (805)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (562)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2648)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (44)
  • SCI (48)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 16 (11)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(169)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Competitive advantage(98)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (1)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (57)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (39)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 2 Issue 6 pp. 1991-2000 , 2012

Assessing intellectual capital management by fuzzy TOPSIS Pages 1991-2000 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Hossein Jannatifar, Mohammad Kazem Keshvar Shahi, Javad Siahkali Moradi

📋 Author Affiliations:
Jannatifar H., KazemKeshvar Shahi M., Siahkali Moradi J. (N/A)
doi 10.5267/j.msl.2012.06.022
Crossmark
3 Source: Scopus

🔑 Keywords: Criteria of suitable model, Fuzzy TOPSIS, Models of evaluating intellectual capital manageme

Abstract: Intellectual capital is a type of asset measuring ability of economic agency in order tomake wealth. These assets do not have physical and objective nature and are intangible assets being achieved through utilization of relative assets with human resources, organizational operation and foreign relations from economic agency. Measuring this issue is important from intra-organizational and extra-organizational views. In this paper, we present survey based on Fuzzy TOPSIS to find important factors influencing intellectual capital management. The proposed model of this paper considers different factors, which exist in the literature and prioritize them based on different criteria. The results of our survey identified seven items as the most influencing factors.

How to cite this paper
APA: Jannatifar, H., Shahi, M & Moradi, J. (2012). Assessing intellectual capital management by fuzzy TOPSIS. Management Science Letters, 2(6), 1991-2000.
Chicago/Turabian: Jannatifar, H., Shahi, M & Moradi, J. 2012. "Assessing intellectual capital management by fuzzy TOPSIS." Management Science Letters 2, no. 6 (2012): 1991-2000.
AMA: Jannatifar, H., Shahi, M & Moradi, J. Assessing intellectual capital management by fuzzy TOPSIS. Management Science Letters. 2012;2(6):1991-2000.

References
Wang, Y.M.,Elhag, T. (2006). Fuzzy topsis method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment.Expert System with Applicatioin, 31,309-319.

Bernnan, N. (2001). Intellectual capital annual reports: evidence from Ireland.Accounting,Auditing & Accountability Journal , 14(4), 423-436.

Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models. Managing Decision, 36(2), 63-76.

1 Bontis, N. (2001). ASSESSING KNOWLEDGE ASSETS:A Review of the Models Used to Measure Intellectual Capital. International Journal of Management reviews, 3(1), 41-60.

Chen,J., Zhu, Z., & Xie,Y.H. (2004). Measuring intellectual capital: a new model and empirical study.Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 85-100.

Flamholtz, E. G., Bullen, M., & Hua, W. (2002). Human Resoure Accounting : A historical prespective and Future implications.Management Decision, 40(10), 947-954.

Guthrie, J., Petty, R., & Johanson, U. (2001). Sunrise in knowledge economy : managing, measurement and Reporting.Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(4), 366 – 382.

Kannan, G., & Aulbur, W. G. (2004). Intellectual capital : measurement effectiveness.Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(3), 389-413.

Kenndy, F.(1998). Intellectual capital in valuing intangible assets.Team Performance Management, 4(4),121-137.

Marr, B. (2008).Impacting Future Value: How to Manage your Intellectual Capital, Published by The Society of Management Accountants of Canada.The American Institute of Certified Public.

Roos, G., Roos, J., Dragonetti, N., & Edvinsson, L. (1997).Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape. Macmillan Business, London.

Sanchez, P., Chaminade, C., & Olea, M. (2000). Management of Intangibles : an Attempt to Build a theory.Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(4), 312-327.

Seetharaman, A., Sooria, H.H.B.Z., & Saravanan, A. S. (2002). Intellectual capital accounting and Reporting in the knowledge economy. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(2), 128-148.

Sullivan, J. P. H., & Sullivan, S. P. H. (2000). Valuing intangible companies : an intellectual capital approach.Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(4), 328-340.

Tayles, M., Bramley, A., Adshead, N., & Farr, J. (2002). Dealing with the management of intellectual capital : The potential role of strategic management accounting.Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 251-267.

Tissen, R., Andriessen, D., & Deprez, F.L. (1998).Creating the 21stCentury Company: Knowledge Intensive, People Rich, Value-based Knowledge Management. Addison Wesley Lingman, Netherlands.

Vasile, B. (2008). Factors of the earning functions and their influence on the intellectual capital of an organization. Journal of applied Quantitative methods, 3(4), 366-374.
  • 85
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2012 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 6 | Views: 2952 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • An empirical study on relationship between intellectual capital and organizational entrepreneurship: A case study of Islamic Azad university of Semnan
  • Measuring intellectual capital and ways to make organizational change: A case study of Maxwell model
  • A study on the relationship between intellectual capital, earning per share and income growth: A case study of Tehran Stock Exchange
  • Value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC): an empirical study
  • The effects of intellectual capital on financial performance: A case study of petrochemical and pharmaceutical firms

📝 Ready to share your research?

Management Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines


Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com