Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Monetary policy reaction function and external economic uncertainty: evidence from 30 selected countries

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (528)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (421)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (293)
  • IJDS (952)
  • JFS (96)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 16 (6)
      • Issue 1 (6)

Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(165)
Vietnam(151)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(115)
Supply chain(112)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(97)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(89)
optimization(87)
Artificial intelligence(85)
Financial performance(84)
Sustainability(84)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Factor analysis(78)
Genetic Algorithm(78)
Social media(78)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(66)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(37)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(28)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2190)
Indonesia(1311)
Jordan(813)
India(793)
Vietnam(510)
Saudi Arabia(477)
Malaysia(444)
China(231)
United Arab Emirates(226)
Thailand(160)
United States(114)
Ukraine(110)
Turkey(110)
Egypt(105)
Peru(94)
Canada(92)
Morocco(86)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 9 Issue 8 pp. 1207-1220 , 2019

Monetary policy reaction function and external economic uncertainty: evidence from 30 selected countries Pages 1207-1220 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Pei-Tha Gan, Kok-Jing Yee, Fatimah Salwa binti Abd. Hadi, Norasibah binti Abdul Jalil

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.4.020

Keywords: Monetary policy reaction, External economic uncertainty, Panel unit root tests, Panel heterogeneous cointegration technique

Abstract: A noteworthy feature in the monetary policy decision making is that interest rate can play a significant role in addressing economic uncertainty. Although the empirical studies on monetary policy reaction function routinely include the output gap and the inflation, not many studies take into account the exchange rate uncertainty and terms of trade uncertainty. To overcome this shortcoming, this paper examines the monetary policy reaction function by including the external economic uncertainty. Based on 30 selected countries, the estimation is relaxed by using the panel heterogeneous cointegration technique. The findings suggest that (i) the interest rate can serve as an important instrument for the central bank policy decision making to combat the economic uncertainty arising from output, inflation, exchange rate and terms of trade (TOT), and (ii) the economic uncertainty (i.e., output uncertainty, inflation uncertainty, exchange rate uncertainty and TOT uncertainty) can serve as a useful information for monetary policy action to avoid and/or mitigate a negative impact of uncertainty.

How to cite this paper
Gan, P., Yee, K., Hadi, F & Jalil, N. (2019). Monetary policy reaction function and external economic uncertainty: evidence from 30 selected countries.Management Science Letters , 9(8), 1207-1220.

Refrences
Falahi, M. A., & Hajamini, M. (2015). Relationship between Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in Iran: An Application of SETAR-GARCH Model. Journal of Money and Economy, 10(2), 69-91.
Ben-Haim, Y., Demertzis, M., Den End, V., & Willem, J. (2017). Fundamental uncertainty and uncon-ventional monetary policy: an info-gap approach. Bruegel Working Paper Issue 1/2017.
Bernanke, B. S. (2010). Implications of the financial crisis for economics: a speech at the Conference Co-sponsored by the Center for Economic Policy Studies and the Bendheim Center for Finance, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, September 24, 2010 (No. 544).
Bianchi, P., & Deschamps, B. (2018). The effectiveness of exchange-rate-based monetary policy: evi-dence from survey data. Applied Economics Letters, 25(18), 1261-1265.
Black, J., Hashimzade, N., & Myles, G. (2017). A Dictionary of Economics. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Christiano, L. J., & Gust, C. J. (1999). Taylor rules in a limited participation model. De Econo-mist, 147(4), 437-460.
Cioran, Z. (2014). Monetary policy, inflation and the causal relation between the inflation rate and some of the macroeconomic variables. Procedia Economics and Finance, 16, 391-401.
Fatima, N. (2010). Analysing the terms of trade: effect for Pakistan (PIDE Working Papers No. 2010:59). Islamabad: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
Funke, N., Granziera, E., & Imam, P. (2008). Terms of trade shocks and economic recovery (IMF Work-ing Paper WP/08/36). Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Gan, P. T. (2014). The optimal economic uncertainty index: A grid search application. Computational Economics, 43(2), 159-182.
Glas, A. and Hartmann, M. (2016). Inflation uncertainty, disagreement, and monetary policy: Evidence from the ECB survey of professional forecasters. Journal of Empirical Finance, 39, 215-228.
Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometric. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271.
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Mifflin.
Kuper, G. H. (2018). The powers that are: central bank independence in the Greenspan era. Empirical Economics, 54, 485-499
Mishkin, F. S. (2002). The role of output stabilization in the conduct of monetary policy (NBER Work-ing Paper No. 9291). MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Orphanides, A., & Norden, S. V. (2002). The unreliability of output-gap estimates in real time. The Re-view of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 569-583.
Papageorgiou, T., Michaelides, P. G. and Tsionas, E. G. (2016). Business cycle determinants and fiscal policy: a panel ARDL approach for EMU. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 13, 57-68.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogene-ous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621-634.
Salunkhe, B., & Patnaik, A. (2017). The impact of monetary policy on output and inflation in India: a frequency domain analysis. Economic Annals, 62(212), 113-154.
Sauer, C., & Bohara, A. K. (1995). Monetary policy and inflation uncertainty in the United States and Germany. Southern Economic Journal, 62(1), 139-163.
Smets, F. (2002). Output gap uncertainty: does it matter for the Taylor rule?. Empirical Economics, 27, 113-129.
Sturm, J. E., & Haan, J. D. (2011). Does central bank communication really lead to better forecast of policy decisions? New evidence based on a Taylor rule model for the ECB. Review of World Eco-nomics, 147, 41-58.
Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnigie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195-214.
Taylor, J. B. (2000). Alternative views of the monetary transmission mechanism: What difference do they make for monetary policy?. Presented at the Central Bank of Chile.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2019 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 8 | Views: 1658 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Financial depth and economic growth: Empirical evidence from ASEAN+3 countr ...
  • The effect of government spending on macroeconomic stability
  • Exchange rate volatility and oil prices shocks and its impact on economic s ...
  • The effect of monetary policy of Central Bank on activities of Tehran Stock ...
  • How do monetary policy tools work? An investigation on monetary transmissio ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com