Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » An empirical study on measurement of efficiency of digital transformation by using data envelopment analysis

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 16 (6)
      • Issue 1 (6)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(110)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Sustainability(81)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Artificial intelligence(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2183)
Indonesia(1290)
India(787)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 9 Issue 4 pp. 549-556 , 2019

An empirical study on measurement of efficiency of digital transformation by using data envelopment analysis Pages 549-556 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Mehmet Nuri İnel

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.1.008

Keywords: Digital transformation, Efficiency, Data envelopment analysis

Abstract: Nowadays digitalization is an important topic for businesses and government agencies. There are important reports publishing about digitalization or digital transformation. This study aims to meas-ure the relative efficiency of digital transformation among EU Countries based on data envelopment analysis (DEA). The necessary data are extracted from Digital Transformation Scoreboard 2018 published by European Commission. DEA is one of popular methods for measuring the relative efficiency of similar units. This study empirically proposes an alternative ranking for countries with respect to digital transformation efficiency by using “enablers and output” approach of Digital Transformation Scoreboard. Digital Infrastructure, Investment and Access to Finance, Supply and Demand of Digital Skills, E-Leadership and Entrepreneurial Culture are considered as input while ICT start-ups and Digital Transformation are considered as the output of DEA model. The results indicate that while some countries like Denmark, Italy and United Kingdom are considered relatively efficient, Netherland and Germany are not very efficient according to our results.

How to cite this paper
İnel, M. (2019). An empirical study on measurement of efficiency of digital transformation by using data envelopment analysis.Management Science Letters , 9(4), 549-556.

Refrences
Aksu, E.Ö. & Gencer, C.T. (2018). Veri Zarflama Analizi İle Oecd Ülkelerinin Çevre Performansının İncelenmesi. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies, (18. EYİ Özel Sayısı) 191-205.
Angeriz, A., Mccombie, J. & Roberts, M. (2006). Productivity, efficiency and technological change in European Union Regional manufacturing: A data envelopment analysis approach. The Manchester School, 74(4), 500-525.
Balyer, A., & Öz, Ö. (2018) Academicians’ views on digital transformation in education. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(4), 809-830.
Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale in-efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Berman, S. J. (2012). Digital transformation: Opportunities to create new business models. Strategy & Leadership, 40(2), 16-24.
Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., Molina-Castillo, F.J. & de Reuver, M. (2018). The impact of digitalization on business models. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20(2), 105-124.
Ceccobelli, M., Gitto, S. & Mancuso, P. (2012). ICT Capital and labour productivity growth: A non-parametric analysis of 14 OECD countries. Telecommunications Policy, 36, 282-292.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
Chodakowska, E., & Nazarko, J. (2017) Environmental DEA method for assessing productivity of Eu-ropean countries. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 23(4), 589-607.
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data Envelopment Analysis A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. USA: Springer
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2011). Data Envelopment Analysis: History, Models and In-terpretations. In: Cooper W.W. , Seiford L. M. & Zhu J. (Eds.) Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer USA, pp. 1-40
Digital Transformation Scoreboard (2018). EU businesses go digital: Opportunities, Outcomes and Up-take, Publications Office of the European Union, 2018
El-Darwiche, B., Singh, M., & Ganediwalla, S. (2012). Digitalization and prosperity. Strategy Business, 68, 2-10.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Socie-ty, Series A, 120(3) 253-290.
Filippetti, A., & Peyrache, A. (2015). Labour productivity and technology gap in European regions: A conditional frontier approach. Regional Studies, 49(4), 532-554
Kaynar, O., Zontul, M. & Bircan, H. (2005) Veri Zarflama Analizi İle Oecd Ülkelerinin Tele-komünikasyon Sektörlerinin Etkinliğinin Ölçülmesi. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 37-57
Chetty, K., Qigui, L., Gcora, N., Josie, J., Wenwei, L., & Fang, C. (2018). Bridging the digital divide: measuring digital literacy. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 12(2018-23), 1-20.
Kumar, S., & Russell, R. R. (2002). Technological change, technological catch-up, and capital deepen-ing: relative contributions to growth and convergence. American Economic Review, 92(3), 527-548.
Li, L., Su, F., Zhang, W., & Mao, J. Y. (2018). Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capabil-ity perspective. Information Systems Journal, 28(6), 1129-1157.
Loonam, J., Eaves, S., Kumar, V., & Parry, G. (2018). Towards digital transformation: Lessons learned from traditional organizations. Strategic Change, 27(2), 101-109.
Majchrzak, A., Markus, M. L., & Wareham, J. (2016). Designing for digital transformation: Lessons for information systems research from the study of ICT and societal challenges. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 267-277.
Mehrabian, S., Alirezaee, M. R., & Jahanshahloo, G. R. (1999). A complete efficiency ranking of deci-sion making units in data envelopment analysis. Computational optimization and applications, 14(2), 261-266.
Melao, N. (2005). Data envelopment analysis revisited: a neophyte's perspective. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 6(2), 158-179.
Mitrović, Đ. (2015). Broadband adoption, digital divide, and the global economic competitiveness of Western Balkan countries. Economic Annals, 60(207), 95-115.
Motta, G. (2016) The Impact of Digitalization on Socio-economic Development: An Analysis at the Eu-ropean and Italian Levels (Thesis) Politecnico Di Milano School of Industrial and Information Engi-neering,
Raab, R. A., & Kotamraju, P. (2006). The efficiency of the high-tech economy: Conventional develop-ment indexes versus: A performance index. Journal of Regional Science, 46(3), 545-562.
Reddy, S., & Reinartz, W. (2017). Digital transformation and value creation: Sea change ahead. Value in the Digital Era, 9(1), 11-17.
Schallmo, D., Williams, C. A., & Boardman, L. (2017). Digital transformation of business models — Best practice, enablers and roadmap. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(8), 1-17.
Schwarzmüller, T., Brosi, P., Duman, D. & Welpe, I.M. (2018). How does the digital transformation af-fect organizations? Key themes of change in work design and leadership. Management Revue, 29(2), 114-138.
Shim, W., & Kantor, P.B. (1999). Evaluation of digital libraries: A DEA approach. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 36, 5-15
UNCTAD (2017). Information Economy Report 2017 Digitalization, Trade And Development, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
Westerman, G., Calméjane, C., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., & McAfee, A. (2011). Digital Transformation: A roadmap for billion-dollar organizations. MIT Center for Digital Business and Capgemini Consulting, 1-68.
  • 85
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2019 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 4 | Views: 5935 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Ranking CCR-efficient units based on the indicator with limited resources
  • An application of DEA based Malmquist productivity index in university perf ...
  • Performance measurement of insurance firms using a two-stage DEA method
  • A new algorithm for benchmarking in integer data envelopment analysis
  • Measuring the relative efficiency of Ilam hospitals using data envelopment ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com