Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Auditing financial statements in insurance enterprises: The case of Vietnam

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 16 (6)
      • Issue 1 (6)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(110)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Sustainability(81)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Artificial intelligence(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2183)
Indonesia(1290)
India(787)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 9 Issue 2 pp. 313-324 , 2019

Auditing financial statements in insurance enterprises: The case of Vietnam Pages 313-324 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Thi Mai Anh Nguyen, Thi Tam Le

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2018.11.009

Keywords: Audit quality of financial statements, Audit procedures, Audit techniques, Insurance enterprises, Risk - based approaches

Abstract: This study is conducted to study the implementation of the audit techniques and procedures executed by auditors using risk-based approach. The study also determines factors affecting audit quality of financial statements in Vietnamese insurance enterprises. Quantitative method is used in the study where questionnaires are sent to 250 independent auditors and 186 valid questionnaires are encrypted, declared and entered into SPSS software version 22.0. The results show that in audit techniques, except for document testing and verification technique, there were significant differences in application level of material testing, observation, interview, calculation and analysis techniques between big 4 firms and non-big 4 firms. The analysis also confirms that the most significant difference was between the two audit groups. In audit procedures, while control testing is not performed singly, detailed testing can be performed alone at all three assurance levels and the analysis is performed alone in the assurance level of 1. It is possible to combine them in these proce-dures with the assurance level of 2 and 3. On the other hand, the combination of these three proce-dures is only guaranteed at level 3. The results of the factor analysis and regression model test demonstrate that there were six factors influencing the audit quality of financial statements in insur-ance enterprises; namely audit method, auditors’ quality, awareness of auditors and director board, characteristics of insurance enterprises, legal environment and position of the audit firm. In particular, audit method and auditors’ quality are the strongest factors.

How to cite this paper
Nguyen, T & Le, T. (2019). Auditing financial statements in insurance enterprises: The case of Vietnam.Management Science Letters , 9(2), 313-324.

Refrences
Vitalis, A. M. (2012). Business risk and audit risk: An integrated model with experimental boundary test (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Madison).
Aldhizer III, G. R., Miller, J. R., & Moraglio, J. F. (1995). Common attributes of quality audits. Journal of Accountancy, 179(1), 61-68.
Bell, T.B, Marrs, F.O., Solomon, I., Thomas, H. (1997). Auditing organizations through a strategic-systems lens: The KPMG Business Measurement Process. KPMG Peat Marwick LLP.
Boon, K., McKinnon, J., & Ross, P. (2008). Audit service quality in compulsory audit tendering: Prepar-er perceptions and satisfaction. Accounting Research Journal, 21(2), 93-122.
Bui, T.T. (2014). Research factors influencing to audit quality of financial statements in enterprises on Vietnamese stock market. Doctoral Thesis. National Economics University.
Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, R. H., & McGrath, N. T. (1992). Audit quality attributes: The perceptions of audit partners, preparers, and financial statement users. Auditing, 11(1), 1-15.
Cullinan, C. P., & Sutton, S. G. (2002). Defrauding the public interest: a critical examination of reengi-neered audit processes and the likelihood of detecting fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(3), 297-310.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor independence, ‘low balling’, and disclosure regulation. Journal of ac-counting and Economics, 3(2), 113-127.
DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275-326.
Dinh, T.T.H. (2015). Application of audit methodologies in financial statement audit conducted by audit firm in Vietnam. Doctoral Thesis, Academy of finance.
Do, H., & Trung, N.S. (2016). The factors affect the quality of financial statements audit in Vietnam businesses. Asian Social Science, 12(1), 172-186.
Duff, A. (2004). Dimentions of audit quality. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
Griffiths, P. (2005). Risk-based Auditing. Gower E-book.
Financial Reportig Council (FRC) (2008). The audit quality framework. Available at: http://www.frc.org.uk/Our -Work/ Publications/FRC -Board/The-Audit-Quality-Framework-%281%29.aspx.
Granberg, L., & Hoglund, L. (2011). The auditor’s way to acquire knowledge about a company’s envi-ronment. Master Thesis, Kristianstad University.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis 7th Edition Pearson Prentice Hall.
Knechel, W. R. (2007). The business risk audit: Origins, obstacles and opportunities. Accounting, Or-ganizations and Society, 32(4-5), 383-408.
Low, K.Y. (2004). The effects of industry specialization on audit risk assessments and audit-planning decisions. The Accounting Review, 79(1), 201-219.
Malaescu, I., & Sutton, G.S. (2013). The Reliance of External Auditors on Internal Audit’s Use of Con-tinuous Audit. Doctoral Thesis. University of Central Florida.
Martar, S. (2012). The Impact of Legal Responsibility of External Auditors on Auditing Quality and In-vestment Level. Department of Economics of Finance, Brunel University.
Mentz, M. (2014). Audit evidence enables the auditor to express an opinion on the financial statements to address the risk that the auditor may express. Doctoral Thesis. University of South Africa.
Messier, S.A., Bernardi, R.A., & Bernard, J.J. (2014). Review of the impact of client trustworthiness on the audit decision-making Process. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 6, 222-247.
Moroney, R (2007). Does industry expertise improve the efficiency of audit judgment?. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(2), 69–94.
Munro, L., & Stewart, J. (2009). External auditors’ reliance on internal audit: the impact of sourcing ar-rangements and consulting activities. Discussion papers accounting, University Griffith.
Palmrose, Z.V. (1988). An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality. The Accounting Review, 63(1), 55-73.
Phan, V.D. (2015). The factors affecting Audit quality of Audit Firms in Vietnam oriented to strengthen competitive capability in international integration conditions. Doctoral Thesis. University of Eco-nomics Ho Chi Minh City.
Prinsloo, J (2008). The development and evaluation of risk-based audit approaches. Magister in ac-counting. University of the Free State.
Richard, C.H., & Jason, L.D. (2006). Employee Theft and Staff Dishonesty. The handbook of security, 9, 203-228.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
Tuukka, J. (2012). Factors Influencing Auditors’ Information Usage: Experience, Risk, Task Structure and Information Reliability. ACTA Wasaensia No 272. Universitas Wasaensis.
Salterio, S. E., & Weirich, T.R. (2002). A primer on the strategic-systems approach to auditing. Universi-ty of Waterloo working paper.
Sarwoko, I., & Sukrisno, A. (2014). An empirical analysis of auditor’s industry specialization, auditor’s independence and audit procedures on audit quality: Evidence from Indonesia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 271-181.
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2019 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 2 | Views: 2484 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • The expectation gap in auditing
  • The effects of professional ethics and commitment on audit quality
  • Auditor-management alignment and audit opinion: Evidence from Iran
  • A survey on relationship between reported condition note in audit report an ...
  • Investigating the relationship between auditor’s opinion and stock return i ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com