How to cite this paper
Akmal, S., Hashim, N., Yahaya, S., Sihombing, H & Yaakob, Y. (2018). Problem identification using function, mechanism and attributes of product.Management Science Letters , 8(11), 1207-1214.
Refrences
Anna, W. D., & Cascini, G. (2011). Supporting sustainable innovation through TRIZ system thinking. Procedia Engineering, 9, 145–156.
Cavallucci, D., Rousselot, F., & Zanni, C. (2011). Using patents to populate an inventive design ontology. Procedia Engineering, 9, 52–62.
Chen, H. (2010). Application of TRIZ and the Kano method to home life industry innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 7(1), 64–84.
Driver, C. and Johnston, R. (2001). Understanding service customers: the value of hard and soft attributes. Journal of Service Research, 4(2), 130–139.
Guarino, N. (1992). Concepts, attributes and arbitrary relations: some linguistic and ontological criteria for structuring knowledge bases. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 8(3), 249–261.
Harlim, J., & Belski, I. (2010). Young engineers and good problem solving: The impact of learning problem solving explicitly. In Proceedings of the 2010 AaeE Conference.
Kamarudin, K. M., Ridgway, K., & Ismail, N. (2016). Abstraction and Generalization in Conceptual Design Process: Involving Safety Principles in TRIZ-SDA Environment. Procedia CIRP, 39(Dec 21), 16–21.
Martin, C. (1998). Relationship marketing: a high-involvement product attribute approach. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7(1), 6–26.
Melemez, K., Gironimo, G. D. I., Esposito, G., & Lanzotti, A. (2013). Concept design in virtual reality of a forestry trailer using a QFD-TRIZ based approach. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 37, 789–801.
Moon, F. C. (2007). The Machines of Leonardo Da Vinci and Franz Reuleaux: kinematics of machines from the Renaissance to the 20th Century. Springer Science & Business Media., 2.
Münzberg, C., Hammer, J., Brem, A., & Lindemann, U. (2016). Crisis Situations in Engineering Product Development : A TRIZ based approach. Procedia CIRP, 39, 144–149.
Najari, A., Dubois, S., Barth, M., & Sonntag, M. (2016). From Altshuller to Alexander : Towards a Bridge between Architects and Engineers. Procedia CIRP, 39, 119–124.
Oxford Dictionary. (2018). Definition of Function. Retrieved May 6, 2018, from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/function
Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (2013). Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
Renev, I. A., & Chechurin, L. S. (2016). Application of TRIZ in building industry : study of current situation. Procedia CIRP, 39, 209–215.
Sade, Y. (2014). The Two Different Types of Product’s Attributes.
Salustri, F. A., & Parmar, J. (2004). Product design schematics: structured diagramming for requirements engineering. In Product design schematics: structured diagramming for requirements engineering.
Tiuc, D., & Draghici, G. (2016). TRIZ Model Used for Complaint Management in the Automotive Product Development Process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221(13), 414–422.
Uicker, J.J., Pennock, G.R. and Shigley, J. . (2003). Theory of machines and mechanisms. In Oxford University Press, USA.
Venugopal, S., & Davuluri, A. K. (2012). A Structured Framework for Training Technologists in Systematic Innovation. In IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) 2012.
Vries, R. W. De, Vaneker, T. H. J., & Souchkov, V. (2011). Development of a framework for using TRIZ in a co-disciplinary design environment. Procedia Engineering, 9, 379–390. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.127
Yang, C., Kao, C., & Liu, T. (2012). An Innovative Product Design Approach Based on TRIZ ’ s Inventive Principles. International Journal of Systematic Innovation, 2(2), 1–8.
Cavallucci, D., Rousselot, F., & Zanni, C. (2011). Using patents to populate an inventive design ontology. Procedia Engineering, 9, 52–62.
Chen, H. (2010). Application of TRIZ and the Kano method to home life industry innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 7(1), 64–84.
Driver, C. and Johnston, R. (2001). Understanding service customers: the value of hard and soft attributes. Journal of Service Research, 4(2), 130–139.
Guarino, N. (1992). Concepts, attributes and arbitrary relations: some linguistic and ontological criteria for structuring knowledge bases. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 8(3), 249–261.
Harlim, J., & Belski, I. (2010). Young engineers and good problem solving: The impact of learning problem solving explicitly. In Proceedings of the 2010 AaeE Conference.
Kamarudin, K. M., Ridgway, K., & Ismail, N. (2016). Abstraction and Generalization in Conceptual Design Process: Involving Safety Principles in TRIZ-SDA Environment. Procedia CIRP, 39(Dec 21), 16–21.
Martin, C. (1998). Relationship marketing: a high-involvement product attribute approach. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7(1), 6–26.
Melemez, K., Gironimo, G. D. I., Esposito, G., & Lanzotti, A. (2013). Concept design in virtual reality of a forestry trailer using a QFD-TRIZ based approach. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 37, 789–801.
Moon, F. C. (2007). The Machines of Leonardo Da Vinci and Franz Reuleaux: kinematics of machines from the Renaissance to the 20th Century. Springer Science & Business Media., 2.
Münzberg, C., Hammer, J., Brem, A., & Lindemann, U. (2016). Crisis Situations in Engineering Product Development : A TRIZ based approach. Procedia CIRP, 39, 144–149.
Najari, A., Dubois, S., Barth, M., & Sonntag, M. (2016). From Altshuller to Alexander : Towards a Bridge between Architects and Engineers. Procedia CIRP, 39, 119–124.
Oxford Dictionary. (2018). Definition of Function. Retrieved May 6, 2018, from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/function
Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (2013). Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
Renev, I. A., & Chechurin, L. S. (2016). Application of TRIZ in building industry : study of current situation. Procedia CIRP, 39, 209–215.
Sade, Y. (2014). The Two Different Types of Product’s Attributes.
Salustri, F. A., & Parmar, J. (2004). Product design schematics: structured diagramming for requirements engineering. In Product design schematics: structured diagramming for requirements engineering.
Tiuc, D., & Draghici, G. (2016). TRIZ Model Used for Complaint Management in the Automotive Product Development Process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221(13), 414–422.
Uicker, J.J., Pennock, G.R. and Shigley, J. . (2003). Theory of machines and mechanisms. In Oxford University Press, USA.
Venugopal, S., & Davuluri, A. K. (2012). A Structured Framework for Training Technologists in Systematic Innovation. In IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) 2012.
Vries, R. W. De, Vaneker, T. H. J., & Souchkov, V. (2011). Development of a framework for using TRIZ in a co-disciplinary design environment. Procedia Engineering, 9, 379–390. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.127
Yang, C., Kao, C., & Liu, T. (2012). An Innovative Product Design Approach Based on TRIZ ’ s Inventive Principles. International Journal of Systematic Innovation, 2(2), 1–8.