Exploring the relationship between social capital, innovation capability and innovation during the coronavirus pandemic

Putra, I.; Sunarsih, N.; Novitasari, L.; Setini, M.

Growing Science » Uncertain Supply Chain Management » Exploring the relationship between social capital, innovation capability and innovation during the coronavirus pandemic

Journals

USCM Volumes

Volume 1 (22)
- Issue 1 (4)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (6)
- Issue 4 (6)

Volume 2 (32)
- Issue 1 (7)
- Issue 2 (5)
- Issue 3 (10)
- Issue 4 (10)

Volume 3 (39)
- Issue 1 (9)
- Issue 2 (13)
- Issue 3 (10)
- Issue 4 (7)

Volume 4 (31)
- Issue 1 (10)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (6)
- Issue 4 (9)

Volume 5 (26)
- Issue 1 (6)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (8)
- Issue 4 (6)

Volume 6 (25)
- Issue 1 (7)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (6)
- Issue 4 (6)

Volume 7 (57)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (19)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (16)

Volume 8 (82)
- Issue 1 (20)
- Issue 2 (15)
- Issue 3 (17)
- Issue 4 (30)

Volume 9 (117)
- Issue 1 (25)
- Issue 2 (26)
- Issue 3 (32)
- Issue 4 (34)

Volume 10 (150)
- Issue 1 (28)
- Issue 2 (32)
- Issue 3 (44)
- Issue 4 (46)

Volume 11 (190)
- Issue 1 (42)
- Issue 2 (45)
- Issue 3 (50)
- Issue 4 (53)

Volume 12 (244)
- Issue 1 (55)
- Issue 2 (59)
- Issue 3 (63)
- Issue 4 (67)

Volume 13 (30)
- Issue 1 (15)
- Issue 2 (15)

Countries

Uncertain Supply Chain Management

ISSN 2291-6830 (Online) - ISSN 2291-6822 (Print) Quarterly Publication Volume 8 Issue 4 pp. 857-864 , 2020

Exploring the relationship between social capital, innovation capability and innovation during the coronavirus pandemic Pages 857-864 Download PDF

Authors: I Gede Cahyadi Putra, Ni Made Sunarsih, Luh Gde Novitasari, Made Setini

DOI: 10.5267/j.uscm.2020.5.007

Keywords: Cocial capital, Business strategy, Innovation ability, Business success, Pandemic Covid-19

Abstract: Social restrictions during the pandemic Covid-19 have direct impacts on the survival of Small and Medium Enterperises (SMEs), since every citizen limits his/her activities, schools, campuses are closed and residents are advised to remain silent and do work from home. The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the effect of social capital, business strategies, and innovation capabilities on business success. The study was conducted in Bali, Indonesia City with 145 samples taken based on a purposive sampling method and data analysis was accomplished using SEM-PLS. The results show that social capital was able to create and expand knowledge about customers, raw materials and competitors and is the key to obtain cheap and fast information that is useful for creating innovation. The support of parents, family members and business partners raise the confidence of entrepreneurs to achieve business success. Business strategy has a positive and significant effect on innovation capability and has no direct effect on success. The findings show that business strategy influences business success through innovation capabilities. At the time of the Covid-19 pandemic the business strategies developed and implemented by SMEs entrepreneurs in the city of Bali, Indonesia was not able to directly increase business success, but when they developed innovative business strategies, they were able to create something or a new system, unique and accepted by consumers, SMEs entrepreneurs success increases business.

How to cite this paper

 Putra, I., Sunarsih, N., Novitasari, L & Setini, M. (2020). Exploring the relationship between social capital, innovation capability and innovation during the coronavirus pandemic.Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8(4), 857-864.

Refrences

Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
Barney, J.B. (1997). Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L.J.D. (2007). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coleman, J.S. (2008). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Belknap Press.USA.
Cook, K.S., & Whitmeyer, J.M. (1992). Two approaches to social structure: Exchange theory and network analysis. Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1), 109-127.
Cox, E. (2006). A Truly Civil Society. Sydney: ABC Book Cooper, DF, and CW, Emory (1996), Business Research Method, 5th Edition, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., USA.
Dutta, D.K. (2013). Benefiting from your buddy. American Journal of Business, 28(2), 192-209.
Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M.S. (2007). Human Capital and Competitiveness guideLine For Policy. Competitiveness Review, 10(2), 192
Ghozali, I. (2011). Structural Equation Modeling - Alternative Methods with Partial Least Square (PLS). Issue 3. Semarang: Diponegoro University Publisher Board.
Grant, R.M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
Gray, B. J., Matear, S., & Matheson, P.K. (2002a). Improving the performance of hospitality firm. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 12(3), 149-155.
Gray, B. J., Matear, S., & Matheson, P. K. (2002b). Improving service firm performance. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(3), 186-200.
Giantari, I. G. A. K., & Widagda, I. G. N. J. A. (2020). Symbiosis mutualism village credit institutions and business strategies in Bali Indonesia. Journal of Talent Development and Excellence, 12(1), 01-14.
Gulati, R. (2005). Alliances and strategic networks. Management Journal, 19, 293-317
Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems.
http://ukmdiskop.denpasarkota.go.id/ accessed on March 26, 2020.
Lee, T. S., & Tsai, H. J. (2005). The effects of business operation mode on market orientation, learning orientation and innovativeness. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(3), 325-348.
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton university press.
Nothnagel, K. (2008). Empirical research within resource-based theory: A meta-analysis of the central propositions. Springer Science & Business Media.
Parkman, I. D., Holloway, S. S., & Sebastiao, H. (2012). Creative industries: aligning entrepreneurial orientation and innovation capacity. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship.
Parnell, J. A. (2010). Strategic clarity, business strategy and performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 3(4), 304-324.
Dealtry, R., & Rademakers, M. (2005). Corporate universities: driving force of knowledge innovation. Journal of Workplace Learning.
Romjin, H., & Albaladejo, M. (2000). Determinant of Innovation Capability in Small UK Firms: An Empirical Analysis, QEH Working Paper Series QEH PS40, Number 40.
Setini, M., Yasa, N. N. K., Gede Supartha, I. W., Ketut Giantari, I., & Rajiani, I. (2020). The passway of women entrepreneurship: Starting from social capital with open innovation, through to knowledge sharing and innovative performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 25.
Suhairi. (2002). Effect of entrepreneurial competence and the use of accounting information in using accounting information in making company selling price decisions; Cases in the medium scale manufacturing industry in Indonesia. Journal of accounting and business. 3(2), 1-12.
Unger, J. M., Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Rosenbusch, N. (2011). Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. Journal of business venturing, 26(3), 341-358.
Scott, G. J., & Chaston, I. (2013). Culture and Innovation in Peru from a Management Perspective. Journal of Global Initiatives: Policy, Pedagogy, Perspective, 7(2), 10.
Yasa, N., Giantari, I., Setini, M., & Rahmayanti, P. (2020). The role of competitive advantage in mediating the effect of promotional strategy on marketing performance. Management Science Letters, 10(12), 2845-2848.