21
How to cite this paper
APA: Biswas, T & Saha, P. (2019). Selection of commercially available scooters by new MCDM method. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 3(2), 137-144.
Chicago/Turabian: Biswas, T & Saha, P. 2019. "Selection of commercially available scooters by new MCDM method." International Journal of Data and Network Science 3, no. 2 (2019): 137-144.
AMA: Biswas, T & Saha, P. Selection of commercially available scooters by new MCDM method. International Journal of Data and Network Science. 2019;3(2):137-144.
References
Biswas, T., & Das, M. (2018a). Selection of hybrid vehicle for green environment using multi-attributive border approximation area comparison method. Management Science Letters, 8(2), 121-130.
Biswas, T. K., & Das, M. C. (2018b). Selection of commercially available electric vehicle using fuzzy AHP-MABAC. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 1-7.
Brans, J. P. (1982). L’ingenierie de la decision, l’laboration d’instruments d’aidea la decision. Colloque sur l’Aidea la Decision. Faculte des Sciences de l’Administration, Universite Laval.
Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European journal of operational research, 95(3), 649-655.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444.
Das, M. C., Sarkar, B., & Ray, S. (2012). A framework to measure relative performance of Indian tech-nical institutions using integrated fuzzy AHP and COPRAS methodology. Socio-Economic Plan-ning Sciences, 46(3), 230-241.
Dağdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., & Kılınç, N. (2009). Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS meth-ods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8143-8151.
Haworth, N. (2012). Powered two wheelers in a changing world—Challenges and opportunities. Acci-dent Analysis & Prevention, 44(1), 12–18. http://doi.or/10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.031
Hsu, T., Sadullah, E., & Dao, I. (2003). A comparison study on motorcycle traffic development in some Asian countries–case of Taiwan, Malaysia and Vietnam, (October). Retrieved from http://www.easts.info/activities/icra/2001/ICRA. Comparison Study Motorcycle Development.pdf.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Spring-er, Berlin Heidelberg.
Pamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016-3028.
Rose, G., Thompson, R. G., Amani, B., & McClure, R. (2012, September). Understanding Ownership and Use of Powered Two Wheelers in Melbourne. In Proc., 35th Australasian Transport Research Forum.
Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples. Revue franįaise d'informa-tique et de recherche opérationnelle, 2(8), 57-75.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Biswas, T. K., & Das, M. C. (2018b). Selection of commercially available electric vehicle using fuzzy AHP-MABAC. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 1-7.
Brans, J. P. (1982). L’ingenierie de la decision, l’laboration d’instruments d’aidea la decision. Colloque sur l’Aidea la Decision. Faculte des Sciences de l’Administration, Universite Laval.
Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European journal of operational research, 95(3), 649-655.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444.
Das, M. C., Sarkar, B., & Ray, S. (2012). A framework to measure relative performance of Indian tech-nical institutions using integrated fuzzy AHP and COPRAS methodology. Socio-Economic Plan-ning Sciences, 46(3), 230-241.
Dağdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., & Kılınç, N. (2009). Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS meth-ods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8143-8151.
Haworth, N. (2012). Powered two wheelers in a changing world—Challenges and opportunities. Acci-dent Analysis & Prevention, 44(1), 12–18. http://doi.or/10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.031
Hsu, T., Sadullah, E., & Dao, I. (2003). A comparison study on motorcycle traffic development in some Asian countries–case of Taiwan, Malaysia and Vietnam, (October). Retrieved from http://www.easts.info/activities/icra/2001/ICRA. Comparison Study Motorcycle Development.pdf.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Spring-er, Berlin Heidelberg.
Pamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016-3028.
Rose, G., Thompson, R. G., Amani, B., & McClure, R. (2012, September). Understanding Ownership and Use of Powered Two Wheelers in Melbourne. In Proc., 35th Australasian Transport Research Forum.
Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples. Revue franįaise d'informa-tique et de recherche opérationnelle, 2(8), 57-75.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.