Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Uncertain Supply Chain Management » Collaborative enhancement of non-MSME credit and optimization of banking idle funds through P2P platforms

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (528)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (421)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (293)
  • IJDS (952)
  • JFS (101)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

USCM Volumes

    • Volume 1 (22)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 3 (39)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (13)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 4 (31)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 5 (26)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 6 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 7 (57)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (19)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • Volume 8 (82)
      • Issue 1 (20)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (17)
      • Issue 4 (30)
    • Volume 9 (117)
      • Issue 1 (25)
      • Issue 2 (26)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (34)
    • Volume 10 (150)
      • Issue 1 (28)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (44)
      • Issue 4 (46)
    • Volume 11 (190)
      • Issue 1 (42)
      • Issue 2 (45)
      • Issue 3 (50)
      • Issue 4 (53)
    • Volume 12 (244)
      • Issue 1 (55)
      • Issue 2 (59)
      • Issue 3 (63)
      • Issue 4 (67)
    • Volume 13 (62)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (15)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 14 (15)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)

Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(165)
Vietnam(151)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(115)
Supply chain(112)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(97)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(89)
optimization(87)
Sustainability(86)
Artificial intelligence(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(78)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(66)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(37)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2192)
Indonesia(1311)
Jordan(813)
India(793)
Vietnam(510)
Saudi Arabia(478)
Malaysia(444)
China(231)
United Arab Emirates(226)
Thailand(160)
United States(114)
Ukraine(110)
Turkey(110)
Egypt(106)
Peru(94)
Canada(93)
Morocco(86)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Uncertain Supply Chain Management

ISSN 2291-6830 (Online) - ISSN 2291-6822 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 12 Issue 1 pp. 37-44 , 2024

Collaborative enhancement of non-MSME credit and optimization of banking idle funds through P2P platforms Pages 37-44 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Cliff Kohardinata, Luky Patricia Widianingsih, Nicklaus Stanley, Yopy Junianto, Anastasia Filiana Ismawati, Evi Thelia Sari

DOI: 10.5267/j.uscm.2023.10.019

Keywords: P2P lending, Banking, Non-UMKM, Liquidity, Fintech

Abstract: The market share of peer-to-peer (P2P) has shifted from dominating the P2P lending for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSME) to non-MSME. Meanwhile, non-MSME credit is an incumbent main market share banking which possibly makes it a complementary or substitution in P2P lending in non-MSME bank credit. Furthermore, optimizing and maintaining liquidity is important due to banks utilizing intermediation functions. The strictness of bank liquidity could determine the management’s response and policy in determining the best timing to utilize either the FinTech from the P2P platform or the customer’s existing funds first. This study aims to assess the empirical findings of the effect of P2P lending on banking credit that is divided between provinces with strict, normal, and lax liquidity. This study uses data from 33 provinces in Indonesia between January 2022 to December 2022. The study approach uses a regression data panel for the data analysis. The results of this study show that P2P lending positively and significantly impacts bank credits of non-MSMEs in provinces with lax bank liquidity. The stricter the banking the lower the compliments of P2P loans against the bank credits of non-MSME. To the author’s knowledge, no existing studies investigate the P2P lending of non-MSME banking credit that also consider the level of strictness of banking liquidity.

How to cite this paper
Kohardinata, C., Widianingsih, L., Stanley, N., Junianto, Y., Ismawati, A & Sari, E. (2024). Collaborative enhancement of non-MSME credit and optimization of banking idle funds through P2P platforms.Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 37-44.

Refrences
Aaker, D., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252171
Abbasi, K., Alam, A., Brohi, N. A., Brohi, I. A., & Nasim, S. (2021). P2P lending Fintechs and SMEs’ access to finance. Economics Letters, 204, 109890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109890
Abdelhafid, M., & Mohammed, S. (2019). The Impact of Information Asymmetry on the Bank Financing of SMEs in Algeria : An Econometric Study. International Journal of Inspiration & Resilience Economy, 3(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijire.20190301.03
Acharya, V., & Naqvi, H. (2012). The seeds of a crisis : A theory of bank liquidity and risk-taking over the business cycle. Journal of Financial Economics, 106(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.014
Admati, A., & Hellwig, M. (2013). Bankers’ New Clothes. Princeton University Press.
Anagnostopoulos, I. (2018). Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 100, 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.07.003
Berger, A. N., & Bouwman, C. H. S. (2009). Bank liquidity creation. Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3779–3837. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn104
Bollaert, H., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Schwienbacher, A. (2021). Fintech and access to finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 68(December 2020), 101941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101941
Christensen, C. M. (1997). Innovator ’ s Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M., McDonald, R., Altman, E. J., & Palmer, J. E. (2018). Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1043–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12349
Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2015). What Is Disruptive Innovation ? Harvard Business Review, December.
Das, S. (2017). Banking on Disruption : Digitization, FinTech and the future of retail banking (Issue June).
Erdogan, A. I. (2019). Determinants of perceived bank financing accessibility for SMEs: evidence from an emerging market. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 32(1), 690–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1578678
Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata Journal, 7(3), 281–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0700700301
Jiang, C., Xu, Q., Zhang, W., Li, M., & Yang, S. (2018). Does automatic bidding mechanism affect herding behavior ? Evidence from online P2P lending in China. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 20, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2018.07.001
Kohardinata, C., Soewarno, N., & Tjahjadi, B. (2020). Indonesian peer to peer lending (P2P) at entrant’s disruptive trajectory. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.11171
Kohardinata, C., Suhardianto, N., & Tjahjadi, B. (2020). Peer-to-peer lending platform: From substitution to complementary for rural banks. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.12606
Levin, J., & Milgrom, P. (2004). Consumer theory. https://web.stanford.edu/~jdlevin/Econ 202/Consumer Theory.pdf
Montgomery, N., Squires, G., & Syed, I. (2018). Disruptive potential of real estate crowdfunding in the real estate project finance industry A literature review. Property Management, 36(5), 597–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-04-2018-0032
Nuhiu, A., Hoti, A., & Bektashi, M. (2017). Determinants of commercial banks profitability through analysis of financial performance indicators: Evidence from Kosovo. Business: Theory and Practice, 18, 160–170. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2017.017
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2023). Statistik Fintech Lending Periode Desember 2022.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Indonesia. (2023). Indonesia Banking Statistic December 2022. In Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
Pengnate, S. (Fone), & Riggins, F. J. (2020). The role of emotion in P2P microfinance funding: A sentiment analysis approach. International Journal of Information Management, 54(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102138
Phan, D. H. B., Narayan, P. K., Rahman, R. E., & Hutabarat, A. R. (2019). Do financial technology firms influence bank performance? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, November 2, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.101210
Pop, I. D., Cepoi, C. O., & Anghel, D. G. (2018). Liquidity-threshold effect in non-performing loans. Finance Research Letters, 27(February), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.02.012
Septina, F. (2022). Leverage , Product Diversification , and Performance of Life Insurance Companies in Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 26(2), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v26i2.7527
Umar, M., & Sun, G. (2016). Non-performing loans ( NPLs ), liquidity creation , and moral hazard : Case of Chinese banks. China Finance and Economic Review, 4(10), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40589-016-0034-y
Werner, R. A. (2016). A lost century in economics: Three theories of banking and the conclusive evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 46, 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.08.014
Zhang, D., Cai, J., Dickinson, D., & Kutan, A. (2016). Non-performing loans, moral hazard and regulation of the Chinese commercial banking system. Journal of Banking and Finance, 63, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.11.010
Zhang, Z., Hu, W., & Chang, T. (2019). Nonlinear effects of P2P lending on bank loans in a Panel Smooth Transition Regression model. International Review of Economics and Finance, 59(August 2017), 468–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.10.010

  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Uncertain Supply Chain Management | Year: 2024 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 1 | Views: 1007 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • The influence of some fintech service on the performance of Islamic bank in ...
  • Does economic policy uncertainty exacerbate the gap between firms’ words an ...
  • Determinants of credit risk: A multiple linear regression analysis of Peruv ...
  • Determinant of net interest income of commercial banks in Indonesia
  • The effect of loan-loss provision, non-performing loans and third-party fun ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com