Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • ๐Ÿ”™ Back
  • ๐Ÿ“š Journals
    • โš™๏ธ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • ๐ŸŒ IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • ๐Ÿงช CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • ๐Ÿ’น AC - Accounting
    • ๐ŸŽฏ DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • ๐Ÿš› USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • ๐Ÿ—๏ธ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • ๐Ÿฅ HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • ๐Ÿ“ˆ SCI - Scientometrica
    • ๐Ÿ”ฉ ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • ๐ŸŒฟ JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • ๐Ÿ’ผ MSL - Management Science Letters
  • ๐Ÿ“ Submit Article
  • ๐Ÿ“Š Statistics
  • ๐Ÿ“‹ About
    • ๐Ÿ“„ About Us
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Blog
    • ๐Ÿ“ข News
    • ๐Ÿ“ง Contact
  • ๐Ÿ“บ Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Journal of Project Management

โญ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

JPM Volumes

    • โ–ผ Volume 11 (103)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (30)
      • Issue 4 (27)
    • โ–ผ Volume 10 (68)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (21)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (19)
    • โ–ผ Volume 9 (35)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • โ–ผ Volume 8 (21)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • โ–ผ Volume 7 (21)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • โ–ผ Volume 6 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • โ–ผ Volume 5 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • โ–ผ Volume 4 (24)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (4)
    • โ–ผ Volume 3 (17)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)
    • โ–ผ Volume 2 (13)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (3)
      • Issue 3 (3)
      • Issue 4 (3)
    • โ–ผ Volume 1 (8)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (3)

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

โœ๏ธ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

๐ŸŒ Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Sort articles by: ๐Ÿ“– Volume | ๐Ÿ“… Date | โญ Most Rates | ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ Most Views | ๐Ÿš€ Rising Stars | ๐Ÿ”— Citations (Scopus) | ๐Ÿ”ฅ Hot Papers
1.

A structural equation modeling approach to examine the relationship between complexity factors of a project and the merits of project manager Pages 1-12 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Ahmad Makui, Pooria Moein Zadeh, Morteza Bagherpour, Armin Jabbarzadeh

doi 10.5267/j.jpm.2017.12.001

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords: Structural equation modeling, Project Management, Project Complexity, Competency Standards, Project Manager

Abstract:
Nowadays, projects have become so widespread in the world that individuals and organizations are always involved in a variety of them. Recent advances in technology and fundamental chang-es in most scientific disciplines have had an essential impact on projects, and have made the na-ture and environmental conditions governing them to become more complex than before. With increasing complexity, the amount of information needed for project management increases. In general, the increasing complexity of projects is a growing source of project risks. It has been recognized that complexity affects the performance of a project and will be effective in its suc-cess. In this context, the traditional principles and practices of project management are no longer able to control the emerging complexity of projects. In addition, one of the key factors for the success of the projects is the appropriateness of the project manager's assignment. Many studies have been carried out in identifying the suitability criteria of the project manager and the methods of selecting the project manager. In most of these studies, the amount and type of complexity of the project are mentioned as factors influencing the design of an appropriate project manager. However, there has not yet been a specific approach for selecting the project manager with re-gard to the complexity of the project. Therefore, in this research, we try to investigate the rela-tionship between the complexity of the project and the merits of the project manager by applying a structural equation modeling approach.
Details
  • 68
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: JPM | Year: 2018 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 1 | Views: 2956

 
2.

Effective heuristics for solving dynamic variant of single processor total tardiness problems Pages 13-22 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Saheed Akande, Ayodeji Emmanuel Oluleye, Elkanah Oyetunji

doi 10.5267/j.jpm.2017.11.001

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords: Heuristics, Branch and Bound, Total Tardiness, Efficient solution, Effective

Abstract:
This paper considers the dynamic variant of single processor scheduling problem of minimizing total tardiness. In practice, it occurs when minimizing tardiness penalty. The problem is NP-hard; thus two heuristics were proposed. The utility of the proposed models was demonstrated through computational experiments and comparative analyses against existing solution methods and the Branch and Bound (BB) method. The results show that the proposed models yield effi-cient solutions and in most cases perform effectively better than the existing heuristics in the lit-erature.
Details
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: JPM | Year: 2018 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 1 | Views: 1827

 
3.

An adaptive algorithm for performance assessment of construction project management with respect to resilience engineering and job security Pages 23-38 PDF Download PDF

Authors: P. Hashemi, R. Yazdanparast, A. Ghavamifar, A. Azadeh

doi 10.5267/j.jpm.2017.10.002

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords: Resilience engineering, Construction project manage-ment, Performance assessment, Artificial neural networks, Job security

Abstract:
Construction sites are accident-prone locations and therefore safety management plays an im-portant role in these workplaces. This study presents an adaptive algorithm for performance as-sessment of project management with respect to resilience engineering and job security in a large construction site. The required data are collected using questionnaires in a large construction site. The presented algorithm is composed of radial basis function (RBF), artificial neural networks multi-layer perceptron (ANN-MLP), and statistical tests. The results indicate that preparedness, fault-tolerance, and flexibility are the most effective factors on overall efficiency. Moreover, job security and resilience engineering have similar statistical impacts on overall system efficiency. The results are verified and validated by the proposed algorithm.
Details
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: JPM | Year: 2018 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 1 | Views: 2314

 
4.

Scheduling of multi load AGVs in FMS by modified memetic particle swarm optimization algorithm Pages 39-54 PDF Download PDF

Authors: V.K. Chawla, Arindam Kumar Chanda, Surjit Angra

doi 10.5267/j.jpm.2017.10.001

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords: Flexible Manufacturing System, Memetic Algorithm, Modified Memetic Particle Swarm Optimization, Multi Load AGVs, Particle Swarm Optimization, Scheduling

Abstract:
Use of Automated guided vehicles (AGVs) is highly significant in Flexible Manufacturing Sys-tem (FMS) in which material handling in form of jobs is performed from one work center to an-other work center. A multifold increase in through put of FMS can be observed by application of multi load AGVs. In this paper, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) integrated with Memetic Algorithm (MA) named as Modified Memetic Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm (MMP-SO) is applied to yield initial feasible solutions for scheduling of multi load AGVs for minimum travel and waiting time in the FMS. The proposed MMPSO algorithm exhibits balanced explora-tion and exploitation for global search method of standard Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm and local search method of Memetic Algorithm (MA) which further results into yield of efficient and effective initial feasible solutions for the multi load AGVs scheduling problem.
Details
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: JPM | Year: 2018 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 1 | Views: 3166

 

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com