Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • ๐Ÿ”™ Back
  • ๐Ÿ“š Journals
    • โš™๏ธ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • ๐ŸŒ IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • ๐Ÿงช CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • ๐Ÿ’น AC - Accounting
    • ๐ŸŽฏ DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • ๐Ÿš› USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • ๐Ÿ—๏ธ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • ๐Ÿฅ HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • ๐Ÿ“ˆ SCI - Scientometrica
    • ๐Ÿ”ฉ ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • ๐ŸŒฟ JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • ๐Ÿ’ผ MSL - Management Science Letters
  • ๐Ÿ“ Submit Article
  • ๐Ÿ“Š Statistics
  • ๐Ÿ“‹ About
    • ๐Ÿ“„ About Us
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Blog
    • ๐Ÿ“ข News
    • ๐Ÿ“ง Contact
  • ๐Ÿ“บ Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Journal of Project Management

โญ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

JPM Volumes

    • โ–ผ Volume 11 (103)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (30)
      • Issue 4 (27)
    • โ–ผ Volume 10 (68)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (21)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (19)
    • โ–ผ Volume 9 (35)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • โ–ผ Volume 8 (21)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • โ–ผ Volume 7 (21)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • โ–ผ Volume 6 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • โ–ผ Volume 5 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • โ–ผ Volume 4 (24)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (4)
    • โ–ผ Volume 3 (17)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)
    • โ–ผ Volume 2 (13)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (3)
      • Issue 3 (3)
      • Issue 4 (3)
    • โ–ผ Volume 1 (8)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (3)

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

โœ๏ธ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

๐ŸŒ Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Sort articles by: ๐Ÿ“– Volume | ๐Ÿ“… Date | โญ Most Rates | ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ Most Views | ๐Ÿš€ Rising Stars | ๐Ÿ”— Citations (Scopus) | ๐Ÿ”ฅ Hot Papers
1.

Measuring the relative efficiency of project management using data envelopment analysis Pages 1-6 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Sara Orouji

doi 10.5267/j.jpm.2017.1.005

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords: DEA, Project management, Efficiency

Abstract:
Measuring the relative efficiency of similar units has been an open research for years. Data en-velopment analysis (DEA) has been widely used among researchers for efficiency measurement. DEA uses different inputs/outputs to measure the relative efficiency of one unit compared with other similar units. This paper presents a comprehensive review on recent applications of DEA techniques on measuring the relative efficiency of project management units. The study covers the implementation of DEA method for measuring the relative efficiency of enterprise resources planning, research and development and construction projects.
Details
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: JPM | Year: 2016 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 1 | Views: 2385

 
2.

Project manager selection based on project manager competency model: PCAโ€“MCDM Approach Pages 7-20 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Mojtaba Sadatrasool, Ali Bozorgi-Amiri, Abolghasem Yousefi-Babadi

doi 10.5267/j.jpm.2017.1.004

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords: Project Manager Selection, PCA, TOPSIS, VIKOR

Abstract:
Personnel selection is one of the most important problems that organizations have to deal with. Competent personnel is one of the key factors for the success of organizations. Project manager selection due to special requirements is significantly important. A project manager must have the ability of managing costs, time and resources through the optimistic way. Furthermore he/she has to own general management skills and benefit from adequate information about the project context. Project managers in petroleum industry carry very important duties than other project managers. In this research, we try to develop a model in order to select a project manager for pe-troleum industry. The proposed model is based on multi criteria decision making and a statistical method named principle component analysis (PCA). The methodology considers all of the im-portant criteria and benefit from an experienced expert panel in order to extract the weights of the criteria. Also a numerical example demonstrates the function of the model and is verified by VI-KOR method.
Details
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: JPM | Year: 2016 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 1 | Views: 4342

 
3.

Green building project management: obstacles and solutions for sustainable development Pages 21-26 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Tahereh Khodadadzadeh

doi 10.5267/j.jpm.2017.1.003

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords: Green building, Project management, Building sector

Abstract:
Building sector is considered as the biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions around the world. Being green, or sustainable, is one of primary issues coming from internal/ external driv-ers for construction and engineering firms. The green building practice extends and supplement the traditional building design perspectives including economy, utility, durability, and comfort. This paper presents a review on recent advances dedicated on different state-of-art articles in the area of green building. The paper raises serious concern to take the necessary actions for green building development.
Details
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: JPM | Year: 2016 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 1 | Views: 6825

 
4.

Comparison and analysis of PMBOK 2013 and ISO 21500 Pages 27-34 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Fereshtheh Tavan, Mokhtar Hosseini

doi 10.5267/j.jpm.2017.1.002

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords: PMBOK, ISO 21500, Project Management Standards, PMI

Abstract:
Experiences and studies, results and documentations review show that the impress and the stra-tegic level of Project Management (PM) have been increased. Different organizations have in-troduced various standards for PM. Indeed, the main criterion to select and apply PM standards relies on the standard, depending on the project type and the experiences of PM managers. The primary objective of PM standards is to direct a project into a systematic and regular framework. Application of PM standards makes project easier and gives accurate analysis that provide bene-fits for executives and gives some managerial approach. The main purpose of this research is to compare and evaluate two most popular and versions of PM standards; namely PMBOK and ISO 21500.
Details
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: JPM | Year: 2016 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 1 | Views: 5998

 
5.

Critical success factors in project management Pages 35-40 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Maryam Orouji

doi 10.5267/j.jpm.2017.1.001

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords: Enterprise resource planning, Six Sigma, CSFs, Project management

Abstract:
In this survey, we perform a survey on different studies associated with critical success factors in project management. The study covers all related studies from 1987 to 2017 based on the arti-cles published on different value added journals. The survey shows that tremendous efforts have been dedicated on important factors, which influence on the success or failure of enterprise re-source planning. The other part of the survey is dedicated for the implementation of Six Sigma projects. Our survey shows that successful implementation of Six Sigma could contribute to the success of projects.
Details
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: JPM | Year: 2016 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 1 | Views: 4774

 

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com