The technological enhancement and its impact on corporate financial performance in the context of the industrial revolution 4.0: The case of Vietnam

Thuy, L.

Abstract: Businesses play an important role in the economy in most countries. Businesses contribute to increased productivity, output and jobs for the economy. Therefore, governments of countries always create favorable business environments to help businesses operate more efficiently, and thereby contribute to the economy. Transforming the industrial revolution 4.0 has brought businesses certain benefits to operations, improving productivity and efficiency. Using data in real estate businesses, through regression analysis, the research results confirm the technology factor has not yet affected the financial performance of enterprises, which can show that businesses need enough time to absorb technology in production activities to have a change in its output. In addition, there exists the negative relationship of leverage in the business and financial performance. Or it can also be confirmed that enterprises that choose their own capital are often more effective than enterprises that choose capital from loans and external financing. The study also confirms that enterprises with the ability to manage total asset turnover have higher financial efficiency. However, the research shows that interest rates have a negative effect on business operations, businesses with high interest rates have a negative effect on business operations, and vice versa.

How to cite this paper

        APA: Thuy, L. (2023). The technological enhancement and its impact on corporate financial performance in the context of the industrial revolution 4.0: The case of Vietnam. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(3), 915-922.
    

        Chicago/Turabian: Thuy, L. 2023. "The technological enhancement and its impact on corporate financial performance in the context of the industrial revolution 4.0: The case of Vietnam." Uncertain Supply Chain Management 11, no. 3 (2023): 915-922.
    

        AMA: Thuy, L. The technological enhancement and its impact on corporate financial performance in the context of the industrial revolution 4.0: The case of Vietnam. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. 2023;11(3):915-922.
    

References

Aboody, D., Barth, M. E., & Kasznik, R. (1999). Revaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: Evidence from the UK, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26(1–3), 149-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00040-8.
Ahmed, M. U., Kristal, M. M., & Pagell, M. (2014). Impact of operational and marketing capabilities on firm performance: Evidence from economic growth and downturns. International Journal of Production Economics, 154, 59-71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.03.025
Bai, M., & Ho, L. (2022). Corporate social performance and firm debt levels: Impacts of the covid-19 pandemic and institutional environments. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102968.
Brockett, P. L., Cooper, W. W., Golden, L. L., Rousseau, J. J., & Wang, Y. (2004). Evaluating solvency versus efficiency performance and different forms of organization and marketing in US property––liability insurance companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2), 492-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00184-X.
Bui, A. T., Pham, T. P., Pham, L. C., & Van Ta, T. K. (2021). Legal and financial constraints and firm growth: small and medium enterprises (SMEs) versus large enterprises. Heliyon, 7(12), e08576.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08576
Burger, A., Damijan, J. P., Kostevc, Č., & Rojec, M. (2017). Determinants of firm performance and growth during economic recession: The case of Central and Eastern European countries. Economic Systems, 41(4), 569-590.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.05.003
Dower, P. C., Gerber, T. P., & Weber, S. (2022). Firms, kinship networks, and economic growth in the Kyrgyz Republic. Journal of Comparative Economics, 50(4), 997-1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2022.08.001.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
Kapopoulos, P., & Lazaretou, S. (2007). Corporate ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from Greek firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 144-158.
Kauffman, R. J., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (1993). Realizing value from information technology investment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), 7-10.
Mwangi, L. W., Makau, M. S., & Kosimbei, G. (2014). Relationship between capital structure and performance of non-financial companies listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya. Global Journal of Contemporary Research in Accounting, Auditing and Business Ethics, 1(2), 72-90.
Pollock, S., Switzer, L. N., & Wang, J. (2023). The dynamics of CEO equity vs. inside debt and firm performance. Research in International Business and Finance, 64, 101891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101891.
Qing, C., Xinyuan, L., Yi, S., & Kun, G. (2016). The Performance Analysis of Real Estate Listed Firms Based on the Sliding Time Window. Procedia Computer Science, 91, 1038-1043.
Tariq, W., Usman, M., Mir, H. Z., Aman, I., & Ali, I. (2014). Determinants of commercial banks profitability: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 4(2), 1-22.
Tarkom, A., & Ujah, N. U. (2023). Inflation, interest rate, and firm efficiency: The impact of policy uncertainty. Journal of International Money and Finance, 131, 102799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102799.