Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Uncertain Supply Chain Management » The effect of competitive strategies on company performance with supply chain management as moderating variables in Indonesian manufacturing corporations

Journals

  • IJIEC (726)
  • MSL (2637)
  • DSL (649)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (404)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (247)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (26)
  • SCI (26)

USCM Volumes

    • Volume 1 (22)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 3 (39)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (13)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 4 (31)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 5 (26)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 6 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 7 (57)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (19)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • Volume 8 (82)
      • Issue 1 (20)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (17)
      • Issue 4 (30)
    • Volume 9 (117)
      • Issue 1 (25)
      • Issue 2 (26)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (34)
    • Volume 10 (150)
      • Issue 1 (28)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (44)
      • Issue 4 (46)
    • Volume 11 (190)
      • Issue 1 (42)
      • Issue 2 (45)
      • Issue 3 (50)
      • Issue 4 (53)
    • Volume 12 (244)
      • Issue 1 (55)
      • Issue 2 (59)
      • Issue 3 (63)
      • Issue 4 (67)
    • Volume 13 (62)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (15)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 14 (15)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)

Keywords

Supply chain management(163)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(148)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(108)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
Competitive advantage(93)
SMEs(86)
optimization(84)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(81)
TOPSIS(80)
Job satisfaction(79)
Sustainability(79)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Genetic Algorithm(76)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(60)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sautma Ronni Basana(27)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2177)
Indonesia(1278)
Jordan(784)
India(782)
Vietnam(500)
Saudi Arabia(440)
Malaysia(438)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(182)
Thailand(151)
United States(110)
Turkey(103)
Ukraine(102)
Egypt(97)
Canada(92)
Pakistan(84)
Peru(83)
Morocco(79)
United Kingdom(79)
Nigeria(77)


» Show all countries

Uncertain Supply Chain Management

ISSN 2291-6830 (Online) - ISSN 2291-6822 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 9 Issue 2 pp. 237-246 , 2021

The effect of competitive strategies on company performance with supply chain management as moderating variables in Indonesian manufacturing corporations Pages 237-246 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Dadang Hermawan

DOI: 10.5267/j.uscm.2021.3.009

Keywords: Competitive Strategy, Firm Performance, Supply Chain Management

Abstract: Dry Port, a supply chain company, strives to bring its workers up to speed in the current VUCA world. The study explores the degree to which ambidexterity affects agility, which can impact organizational effectiveness. The structural equation model with multilevel simulation used to test the research hypothesis. The study indicates that ambidexterity is an influential factor to agility, and that ambidexterity is also an impactful factor to agility and organizational effectiveness. Furthermore, there is also evidence that the power of agility contributes to greater organizational effectiveness, and also that ambidexterity has an impact on organizational effectiveness through workforce agility. To achieve organizational effectiveness in dry port business, mobile devices and social network technology are functional enablers of ambidextrous activities that can allow staff to be agile in handling dry port business tasks.

How to cite this paper
Hermawan, D. (2021). The effect of competitive strategies on company performance with supply chain management as moderating variables in Indonesian manufacturing corporations.Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 237-246.

Refrences
Adha, W. M. (2017). Integrasi Rantai Pasok terhadap Kinerja dan daya saing kakao. Jurnal Bisnis Darmajaya, 3(2), 146-162.
Anton, F. X. (2010). Menuju teori stewardship manajemen. Majalah Ilmiah Informatika, 1(2).
Bharadwaj, A. S., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Konsynski, B. R. (1999). Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q. Management science, 45(7), 1008-1024.
Blose, L. E., & Shieh, J. C. (1997). Tobin's q‐Ratio and market reaction to capital investment announcements. Financial Review, 32(3), 449-476.
Chang, H., Fernando, G. D., & Tripathy, A. (2015). An empirical study of strategic positioning and production efficiency. Advances in Operations Research, 2015.
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2007). Supply chain management. Strategy, planning & operation. In Das summa summarum des management (pp. 265-275). Gabler.
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management review, 22(1), 20-47.
Ellinger, A. E., Natarajarathinam, M., Adams, F. G., Gray, J. B., Hofman, D., & O’Marah, K. (2011). Supply chain management competency and firm financial success. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(3), 214-226.
Ghatebi, M., Ramezani, E., & Shiraz, M. A. E. (2013). Impact of Supply Chain Management Practices on Competitive Advantage in Manufacturing Companies of Khuzestan Province. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research Business, 5(6), 269-274.
Ghozali, I. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling:Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gitman, L. J., & Zutter, C. J. (2012). Principle of Managerial Finance. Essex, England.
Irham, F. (2011). Manajemen kinerja teori dan aplikasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Jermias, J., & Gani, L. (2004). Integrating business strategy, organizational configurations and management accounting systems with business unit effectiveness: a fitness landscape approach. Management accounting research, 15(2), 179-200.
Le Roy, F., & Czakon, W. (2016). Managing coopetition: the missing link between strategy and performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 53(1), 3-6.
Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Rao, S. S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107-124.
McLeod Jr, R. (1996). Sistem Informasi Manajemen: Studi Sistem Informasi Berbasis Komputer Jilid I. Jakarta: PT. Prenhallindo.
Oliver, R. K., & Webber, M. D. (1982). Supply-chain management: logistics catches up with strategy. Outlook, 5(1), 42-47.
Perry II, J. F. (2012). The impact of supply chain business processes on competitive advantage and organizational performance.
Pujawan, I. N. (2005). The Effect of Different Payment Terms on Order Variability in a Supply Chain. In Successful Strategies in Supply Chain Management (pp. 90-108). IGI Global.
Raharjo, E. (2007). Teori Agensi dan Teori Stewarship dalam Perspektif Akuntansi. Fokus Ekonomi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, 2(1).
Rahmasari, L. (2011). Pengaruh supply chain management terhadap kinerja perusahaan dan keunggulan bersaing (Studi kasus pada industri kreatif di Provinsi Jawa Tengah). Majalah Ilmiah Informatika, 2(3).
Rasid, S. Z. A., Isa, C. R., & Ismail, W. K. W. (2014). Management accounting systems, enterprise risk management and organizational performance in financial institutions. Asian Review of Accounting.
Render, B., & Heizer, J. (2005). Manajemen Operasional.
Robert, A. N., & Vijay, G. (2012). Management Control System (Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen). Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
Siagian, Y. M. (2005). Aplikasi Supply Chain Management dalam Dunia Bisnis. Grasindo. Jakarta.
Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., Simchi-Levi, E., & Shankar, R. (2008). Designing and managing the supply chain: concepts, strategies and case studies. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Soetjipto, N., Sulastri, S., Prastyorini, J., Soedarmanto, S., & Riswanto, A. (2021). Implementation of enterprise human resources management standards to achieve supply chain excellence in fertilizer companies in Indonesia. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(1), 107-114.
Sudiyatno, B., & Puspitasari, E. (2010). Tobin's q dan altman z-score sebagai indikator pengukuran kinerja perusahaan. Kajian Akuntansi, 2(1), 247233.
Suhartati, T., & Rosietta, H. (2012). Pengaruh Strategi Bersaing Terhadap Hubungan Antara Supply Chain Management Dan Kinerja. Universitas Indonesia. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XV.
Suharto, R. J. (2013). Analisa Pengaruh Supply Chain Management terhadap keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja perusahaan. Business Accounting Review, 1(2), 226-235.
Tanwari, A. (2020). A Study on Assessing the Relationship between Green Marketing and Brand Loyalty in Manufacturing Sector of Greece: A Moderating Role of Green Supply Chain Practices. Arthatama, 4(1), 44-55.
Tewal, B. (2010). Pengaruh strategi bersaing dan inovasi terhadap kinerja perusahaan perhotelan di Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 8(2), 464-470.
Ulfa, M. (2015). Pengaruh Strategi Bersaing Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Dengan Supply Chain Management Sebagai Variabel Moderating Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, STIE Perbanas Surabaya).
Wheelen, T. L., Hunger, J. D., Hoffman, A. N., & Bamford, C. E. (2017). Strategic management and business policy (p. 55). Boston, MA: pearson.
Wright, P., Kroll, M., Mukherji, A., & Pettus, M. L. (2009). Do the contingencies of external monitoring, ownership incentives, or free cash flow explain opposing firm performance expectations?. Journal of Management & Governance, 13(3), 215-243.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Uncertain Supply Chain Management | Year: 2021 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 2 | Views: 1431 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • The role of profitability in moderating the factors affecting transfer pric ...
  • The effect of debt covenant, political cost and IFRS implementation towards ...
  • Factors affecting e-procurement division employee performance
  • The effect of BPK audit result on financial performance
  • The effect of business sphere on competitive advantage and business perform ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2025 GrowingScience.Com