This research aims to investigate the impact of digital transformation on the operational efficiency, customer experience, competitive advantage, organizational performance, and risk management in Jordanian Islamic banks. A descriptive analytical method was used, collecting primary data from a survey of 68 employees across four Islamic banks. Statistical tools, including linear regression and correlation, were used for data analysis and hypothesis testing. The findings revealed that digital transformation significantly influences the operational efficiency, competitive advantage, customer experience, organizational performance, and risk management of Islamic banks at a significance level of α ≤ 0.05. While digital transformation generally enhanced operational outcomes and customer experience, it also increased exposure to risks such as electronic attacks, fraud, and privacy concerns. The results highlight the importance of integrating digital transformation in Islamic banking while employing robust risk management strategies. These findings provide insights for policymakers, bank managers, and researchers in formulating strategic initiatives for digital transformation in the banking sector. The research contributes to the literature by focusing on the role of digital transformation in Islamic banking, a less-explored area in academic studies. This research also presents valuable implications for practice, specifically for banks and regulators to balance the potential of digital transformation with the associated risks.

The rapid advancement of technology has had a significant impact on a wide range of industries, including the auditing industry. It is now obvious that employing Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques (CAATs) is a possible tactic for enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of the audit process. This study evaluates how CAATs affect auditors' expectations for performance and effort in Jordan. Through a comprehensive survey of Jordanian auditors, this research provides insights into the factors that drive CAATs adoption. Utilizing structural equation modeling, the study confirms that both Effort Expectancy and Performance Expectancy positively influence CAATs adoption. These relationships are supported by robust path coefficients and low P-values, indicating statistical significance. The results of this study should clarify the possible advantages of including CAATs in the audit process and point out any difficulties auditors could encounter. Companies and professionals may choose wisely whether to embrace and use CAATs by comprehending Performance Expectancy and Effort Expectancy.