This study sought to determine how CAATS, corporate governance (CG), and EIAF positively and directly influence the quality of financial reports (QFR). In addition to identifying the moderating effect of EIAF on the links between CAATS, CG and QFR in Saudi commercial banks. To this end, data was collected from 293 participants, including administrative managers, board members, internal auditors, certified public accountants, and staff members from the audit and internal audit departments as well as the accounting departments. Using structural equation modelling (SEM) via SmartPls, data was analyzed. The study showed that QFR is positively and significantly affected by CAATS, CG, and EIAF. Moreover, EIAF does not moderate the effect of CAATS and CG on QFR. Hence, this study enriches accounting literature and has implications for both practitioners and policymakers.

The rapid advancement of technology has had a significant impact on a wide range of industries, including the auditing industry. It is now obvious that employing Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques (CAATs) is a possible tactic for enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of the audit process. This study evaluates how CAATs affect auditors' expectations for performance and effort in Jordan. Through a comprehensive survey of Jordanian auditors, this research provides insights into the factors that drive CAATs adoption. Utilizing structural equation modeling, the study confirms that both Effort Expectancy and Performance Expectancy positively influence CAATs adoption. These relationships are supported by robust path coefficients and low P-values, indicating statistical significance. The results of this study should clarify the possible advantages of including CAATs in the audit process and point out any difficulties auditors could encounter. Companies and professionals may choose wisely whether to embrace and use CAATs by comprehending Performance Expectancy and Effort Expectancy.