Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » Providing hierarchical approach for measuring supply chain performance using AHP and DEMATEL methodologies

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

IJIEC Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 17 (113)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (26)
      • Issue 4 (36)
    • ▼ Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (77)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 1 Issue 2 pp. 199-212, 2010

Providing hierarchical approach for measuring supply chain performance using AHP and DEMATEL methodologies Pages 199-212 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Ali Najmi, Ahmad Makui

📋 Author Affiliations:
Ali Najmi ORCID , Ahmad Makui ORCID
¹ Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
doi 10.5267/j.ijiec.2010.02.008
41 Source: Scopus
Crossref 18 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: DEMATEL, Analytical Hierarchy Process, Supply Chain Performance, Integration, Metrics interdependence

Abstract: Measuring the performance of a supply chain is normally of a function of various parameters. Such a problem often involves in a multiple criteria decision making (MCMD) problem where different criteria need to be defined and calculated, properly. During the past two decades, Analytical hierarchy procedure (AHP) and DEMATEL have been some of the most popular MCDM approaches for prioritizing various attributes. The study of this paper uses a new methodology which is a combination of AHP and DEMATEL to rank various parameters affecting the performance of the supply chain. The DEMATEL is used for understanding the relationship between comparison metrics and AHP is used for the integration to provide a value for the overall performance

How to cite this paper
APA: Najmi, A & Makui, A. (2010). Providing hierarchical approach for measuring supply chain performance using AHP and DEMATEL methodologies. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 1(2), 199-212.
Chicago/Turabian: Najmi, A & Makui, A. 2010. "Providing hierarchical approach for measuring supply chain performance using AHP and DEMATEL methodologies." International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 1, no. 2 (2010): 199-212.
AMA: Najmi, A & Makui, A. Providing hierarchical approach for measuring supply chain performance using AHP and DEMATEL methodologies. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 2010;1(2):199-212.

References
Agarwal, A., Shankar, R. & Tiwari, M.K. (2006). Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 173, 211–225.

Angerhofer, B. J. & Angelides, M. C. (2006). A model and a performance measurement system for collaborative supply chains, Decision Support Systems, 42, 283– 301.

Banwet, D.K. & Deshmukh, S.G. (2008). Evaluating performance of national R&D organizations using integrated DEA-AHP technique, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57(5), 370–388.

Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring Supply Chain Performance, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(3), 275-292.

Beamon, B. M. (1998). Supply chain design and analysis: models and methods, International Journal of Production Economicst, 55(3), 281-294.

Berrah, L. & Cliville´, V. (2007). Towards an aggregation performance measurement system model in a supply chain context. Production Planning & Control, 58, 709–719.

Bhagwat, R. & Sharma, M.K. (2007). Performance measurement of supply chain management using the analytical hierarchy process, Computers in Industry, 18(8), 666–680.

Chen, I.J. & Paulraj, A. (2004). Understanding supply chain management: critical research and a theoretical framework. International Journal of Production Research, 42(1), 131-163.

Chang, S.L., Wang, R.C. & Wang, S.Y. (2007). Applying a direct multi-granularity linguistic and strategy-oriented aggregation approach on the assessment of supply performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1013–1025.

Chopra, S. & Meindl, P. (2004), Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and Operations, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Felix T.S. Chan & Qi, H. J. (2003), An innovative performance measurement method for supply chain management, Supply Chain Management, 8(3), 209-223.

Fontela, E. & Gabus, A. (1974), DEMATEL. Progress Achieved, Futures 6, 329–333.

Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C. & Tirtiroglu, E. (2001). Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1) 71-87.

Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., Ronald, E., & McGaughey, R. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement, International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 333–348.

Hausman, Warren H. (2002), Supply chain performance metrics, Corey Billington, Terry H., Hau L., and Hohn N. (Ed.), The practice of supply chain management, Kluwer Academic Publishiers.

Isik, Z., Dikmen, I. & Birgonul, M. T. (2007). Using Analytic Network Process (ANP) for Performance Measurement in Construction, The construction and building research conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, Georgia Tech, Atlanta USA.

Jagdev, H.S. & Browne, J. (1998), The extended enterprise—a context for manufacturing, Production Planning & Control, 9(3), 216–229.

Kaplan, R.S. & Norton D.P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard – Measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, 71-79.

Kim, Y. H. (2006 ). Study on Impact Mechanism for Beef Cattle Farming and Importance of Evaluating Agricultural Information in Korea Using DEMATEL, PCA and AHP. Agricultural Information Research, 15(3), 267–280.

Laura XU Xiao Xia, Bin MA, Roland LIM, (2007). AHP Based Supply Chain Performance Measurement System, Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology, Singapore.

Rushton, A. & Oxley, J. (1989). Handbook of Logistics and Distribution Management. Kogan Page Ltd., London.

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw- Hill, New York.

Sharma, M. J., Moon, I. & Bae, H. (2008). Analytic hierarchy process to assess and optimize distribution network, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 202, 256–265.

Soni, G. & Kodali, R. (2010). Internal benchmarking for assessment of supply chain performance, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 17(1), 44-76.

Supply Chain Council (2006). Supply Chain Operations Reference Model: Overview of SCOR Version 8.0, available at: www.Supply Chain.org

Sureshchandar, G.S. & Leisten, R. (2006). A framework for evaluating the criticality of software metrics: an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach, Measuring Bussiness Execellence, 10(4) 22–33.

Taticchi, P., Tonelli, F. & Cagnazzo, L. (2009). A decomposition and hierarchical approach for business performance measurement and management, Measuring Bussiness Execellence, 13(4), 47–57.

Yurdakul, M. & Ic, Y. T. (2005), Development of a performance measurement model for manufacturing companies using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches, International Journal of Production Research, 43(21), 4609–4641.
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | 📅 Year: 2010 | 📖 Volume: 1 | 📄 Issue: 2 | 👁️ Views: 4652 | 📊 Crossref: 18

Related Articles:
  • Strategic orientation in evaluation of supply chain activities
  • Evaluating performance of supply chain based on network data envelopment analysis
  • Supply chain quality management
  • Developing a DEMATEL method to prioritize distribution centers in supply chain
  • Continuous supply chain collaboration: Road to achieve operational excellence

📝 Ready to share your research?

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com