Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » Solving the permutation flow shop problem with blocking and setup time constraints

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (51)
  • SCI (52)

IJIEC Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 17 (113)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (26)
      • Issue 4 (36)
    • ▼ Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (77)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
Sustainability(93)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
Trust(85)
TOPSIS(85)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 11 Issue 3 pp. 469-480, 2020

Solving the permutation flow shop problem with blocking and setup time constraints Pages 469-480 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Mauricio Iwama Takano, Marcelo Seido Nagano

📋 Author Affiliations:
Mauricio Iwama Takano1, Marcelo Seido Nagano ORCID 2
1 Federal Technological University-Paraná, Av. Alberto Carazzai, 1640, Cornélio Procópio, 86300-000, PR, Brazil
2 University of São Paulo, School of Engineering of São Carlos, Department of Production Engineering, Av. Trabalhador São-carlense, 400, São Carlos, 13566-590, SP, Brazil
doi 10.5267/j.ijiec.2019.11.002
12 Source: Scopus
Crossref 8 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Scheduling, Flow shop, Blocking, Setup time constraints, Mixed-integer programming model, Iterated Greedy

Abstract: In this paper, the flow shop with blocking and sequence and machine dependent setup time problem aiming to minimize the makespan is studied. Two mixed-integer programming models are proposed (TNZBS1 and TNZBS2) and two other mixed-integer programming models, originally proposed for the no setup problem, are adapted to the problem. Furthermore, an Iterated Greedy algorithm is proposed for the problem. The permutation flow shop with blocking and sequence and machine dependent setup time is an underexplored problem and the authors did not find the use of mixed-integer programming models for the problem in any other work. To compare the models, a database of 80 problems was generated, which vary in number of machines and jobs. For the small sized problems, the adapted MILP model obtained the best results. However, for bigger problems, both proposed MILP models obtained significantly better results compared to the adapted models, proving the efficiency of the new models. When comparing the Iterated Greedy algorithm with the MILP models, the former outperformed the latter.



How to cite this paper
APA: Takano, M & Nagano, M. (2020). Solving the permutation flow shop problem with blocking and setup time constraints. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 11(3), 469-480.
Chicago/Turabian: Takano, M & Nagano, M. 2020. "Solving the permutation flow shop problem with blocking and setup time constraints." International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 11, no. 3 (2020): 469-480.
AMA: Takano, M & Nagano, M. Solving the permutation flow shop problem with blocking and setup time constraints. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 2020;11(3):469-480.

References
Hall, N. G., & Sriskandarajah, C. (1996). A survey of machine scheduling problems with blocking and no-wait in process. Operations Research, 44(3), 510-525.
Maleki-Darounkolaei, A., Modiri, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Seyyedi, I. (2012). A three-stage assembly flow shop scheduling problem with blocking and sequence-dependent set up times. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 8-26.
Miyata, H. H., & Nagano, M. S. (2019). The blocking flow shop scheduling problem: A comprehensive and conceptual review. Expert Systems with Applications, 137, 130-156.
Norman, B. A. (1999). Scheduling flowshops with finite buffers and sequence-dependent setup times. Computer & Industrial Engineering, 16(1), 163-177.
Pan, C. H. (1997). A study of integer programming formulations for scheduling problems. International Journal of Systems Science, 28, 33-41.
Pan, Q.-K., & Ruiz, R. (2014). An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle permutationflowshop scheduling problem. Omega, 44, 41-50.
Papadimitriou, C., & Kanellakis, P. (1980). Flow-shop scheduling with limited temporary storage. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 27(3), 533-549.
Rad, S. F., Ruiz, R., & Boroojerdiana, N. (2009). New high performing heuristics for minimizing makespan in permutation flowshops. Omega, 37(2), 331-345.
Ronconi, D. P., & Birgin, E. G. (2012). Mixed-integer programming models for flowshop scheduling problems minimizing the total earliness and tardiness. Just-in-Time Systems, 61, 91-105.
Sanches, F. B., Takano, M. I., & Nagano, M. S. (2016). Evaluation of heuristics for a branch and bound algorithm to minimize the makespan in a flowshop with blocking. Acta Scientiarum, 38(3), pp. 321-326.
Stafford, E. F. (1988). On the Development of a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Model for the Flowshop Sequencing Problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39, 1163-1174.
Stafford, E. F., Tseng, F. T., & Gupta, J. N. (2005). Comparative evaluation of MILP flowshop models. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56, 88-101.
Taillard, E. (1993). Benchmarks for basic scheduling problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 64(2), 278-285.
Takano, M. I., & Nagano, M. S. (2019). Evaluating the performance of constructive heuristics for the blocking flow shop scheduling. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 10, pp. 37-50.
Zhu, Z., & Heady, R. B. (2000). Minimizing the sum of earliness/tardiness in multimachine scheduling: a mixed integer programming approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 38, 297-305.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | 📅 Year: 2020 | 📖 Volume: 11 | 📄 Issue: 3 | 👁️ Views: 1932 | 📊 Crossref: 8

Related Articles:
  • Evaluating the performance of constructive heuristics for the blocking flow shop scheduling problem with setup times
  • Solving group scheduling problem in no-wait flexible flowshop with random machine breakdown
  • A heuristic algorithm for scheduling in a flow shop environment to minimize makespan
  • A new effective heuristic method for the no-wait flowshop with sequence-dependent setup times problem
  • A discrete firefly meta-heuristic with local search for makespan minimization in permutation flow shop scheduling problems

📝 Ready to share your research?

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com