Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Engineering Solid Mechanics » A comparative study of the quality of sandcrete cement blocks and quarry dust cement blocks

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2653)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (49)
  • SCI (50)

ESM Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 14 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (32)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (39)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (35)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (36)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (28)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (32)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (25)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (16)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (4)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Competitive advantage(98)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Engineering Solid Mechanics
ISSN 2291-8752 (Online) - ISSN 2291-8744 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 9 Issue 3 pp. 281-290, 2021

A comparative study of the quality of sandcrete cement blocks and quarry dust cement blocks Pages 281-290 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Richard Lumor, Lawrence Abladey, David Tikoli, Alfred Kofi Gand, Ezekiel Osei Owusu, Kofi Offei-Nyako, Inok Edim Edim

📋 Author Affiliations:
R. Lumor1, L. Abladey2, D. Tikoli ORCID 1, A.K. Gand ORCID 3, E.O. Owusu1, K. Offei-Nyako1, I.E. Edim2
1 Council for Scientific and Industrial Research-Building and Road Research Institute, Fumesua, Ghana
2 School of Engineering and Technology, Department of Civil Engineering, Central University, Accra, Ghana
3 School of Energy, Construction and Environment, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom
doi 10.5267/j.esm.2021.3.002
3 Source: Scopus
Crossref 2 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Sandcrete, Quarry dust, Water absorption, Compressive strength

Abstract: With the increase of construction activities in Ghana, there is an increasing demand in building materials leading to the shortage of the conventional materials. The informal sector is gradually seeing the introduction of quarry dust as a substitute of sand in block production. This paper focuses on a comparative analysis of the quality of sandcrete blocks and quarry dust cement blocks. Block samples were gathered from various suppliers around the Prampram and Dawhenya areas and through various laboratory tests were tested for their dimension tolerance, water absorption and compressive strengths. Aggregate samples were also taken from suppliers for sieve analyses. The study revealed that the quarry dust cement blocks contained relatively higher percentages of coarse grade particles compared to the sandcrete blocks. The total average water absorption of sandcrete blocks was found to be 3.90% while quarry dust showed an improved value of 3.28%. Sandcrete blocks were averagely found to be of a higher compressive strength of 4.31N/mm2, with quarry dust at 3.0N/mm2. The study suggested the likelihood of a lesser use of cement in the production of quarry dust cement blocks due to the similarities in colour between the quarry dust and cement, hence, negatively affecting its compressive strength.


How to cite this paper
APA: Lumor, R., Abladey, L., Tikoli, D., Gand, A., Owusu, E., Offei-Nyako, K & Edim, I. (2021). A comparative study of the quality of sandcrete cement blocks and quarry dust cement blocks. Engineering Solid Mechanics, 9(3), 281-290.
Chicago/Turabian: Lumor, R., Abladey, L., Tikoli, D., Gand, A., Owusu, E., Offei-Nyako, K & Edim, I. 2021. "A comparative study of the quality of sandcrete cement blocks and quarry dust cement blocks." Engineering Solid Mechanics 9, no. 3 (2021): 281-290.
AMA: Lumor, R., Abladey, L., Tikoli, D., Gand, A., Owusu, E., Offei-Nyako, K & Edim, I. A comparative study of the quality of sandcrete cement blocks and quarry dust cement blocks. Engineering Solid Mechanics. 2021;9(3):281-290.

References
Abdullahi, M. (2005). Compressive strength of sandcrete blocks in Bosso and Shiroro areas of Minna, Nigeria. AU JT, 9(2), 126-131.
Afolayan, J. O., Arum, C., & Daramola, C. M. (2008). Characterization of the compressive strength of sandcrete blocks in Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Civil Engineering Research and Practice, 5(1), 15-28.
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) C136: Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregate.
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) C150: Standard Specification for Portland cement.
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) D75: Standard practice for sampling aggregates.
Anosike, M. N., & Oyebade, A. A. (2012). Sandcrete blocks and quality management in Nigeria Building Industry. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 2(1), 37-46.
Anya, C. U. (2015). MODELS FOR PREDICTING THE STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OFSAND-QUARRY DUST BLOCKS.
Badu, E., & Owusu-Manu, D. (2011). An overview of construction activities in Kumasi. Future of the Tree–Towards growth and development of Kumasi, Kwasi Kwafo Adarkwa (ed), University Printing Press, KNUST, Kumasi, 270-289.
Baiden, B. K., & Asante, C. K. O. (2004). Effects of orientation and compaction methods of manufacture on strength properties of sandcrete blocks. Construction and Building Materials, 18(10), 717-725.
Balamurugan, G., & Perumal, P. (2013). Use of quarry dust to replace sand in concrete–An experimental study. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(12), 1.
Building and Construction materials – specification for blocks Part 1: Precast sandcrete Blocks. GS 297-1:2010 2nd EDITION. ICS 91.100.30
Hadjri, K. (2007). Attitudes towards earth building viability for Zambian housing provision. Engineering Sustainability, 160, 10-20.
Hedidor, D., & Bondinuba F.K. (2018). An Analysis of Construction Material Batching Behaviour of Artisans in Ghana’s Informal Construction Sector. International Journal of Civil Engineering, Construction and Estate Management, 6(2), 27–58.
Ikechukwu, U. F. (2012). Compressive Strength and Costs of Sandcrete Blocks and blocks made with quarry dust in Nigeria: A Case study of Abakaliki Quarry. Journal of Chemical, Mechanical and Engineering Practice, 2(3), 9-17.
NIS 2000. NIS 87:2000. Nigerian Industrial Standard: Standard for Sandcrete blocks. Standard Organisation of Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria.
Olufisayo, A. A. (2013). Strength Properties of Commercially produces Sandcrete Blocks in Ado Ekiti, Akure and Ile Ife Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 2(8), 25-34.
Oppong, R. A., & Badu, E. (2012). Evaluation of Stabilised-Earth (Tek) Block for Housing Provision and Construction in Ghana. Journal of Science and Technology (Ghana), 32(2), 104-118.
Oyekan, G. L., & Kamiyo, O. M. (2008). Effects of Granites Fines on the Structural and Hygrothermal Properties of Sandcrete Blocks. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(9), 735-741.
Rai, B., Kumar, S., & Satish, K. (2014). Effect of fly ash on mortar mixes with quarry dust as fine aggregate. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2014.
Sankh, A. C., Biradar, P. M., Naghathan, S. J., & Ishwargol, M. B. (2014). Recent trends in replacement of natural sand with different alternatives. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Engineering and Technology (pp. 59-66).
Sivakumar, A., & Prakash, M. (2011). Characteristic studies on the mechanical properties of quarry dust addition in conventional concrete. Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction Technology, 2(10), 218-235.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Engineering Solid Mechanics | 📅 Year: 2021 | 📖 Volume: 9 | 📄 Issue: 3 | 👁️ Views: 1718 | 📊 Crossref: 2

Related Articles:
  • Analysis of the attenuative behaviour of accelerated cement based materials through a series of ultrasound Pulse Echo measurements
  • Edgewise and flatwise compressive behaviour of foam-filled sandwich panels with 3-D high density polyethylene skins
  • Production procedures and mechanical behaviour of interlocking stabilized compressed earth blocks (ISCEBs) manufactured using float ram 1.0 press
  • Effect of fiber volume fraction in the tensile properties of renewable Diss fiber /polyester composite
  • Experimental study on mechanical properties of different lightweight aggregate concretes

📝 Ready to share your research?

Engineering Solid Mechanics is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com