Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Engineering Solid Mechanics » Effects of cold joints on the structural behaviour of polyurethane rigid foam panels

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (528)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (421)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (293)
  • IJDS (952)
  • JFS (96)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

ESM Volumes

    • Volume 1 (16)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (4)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)
    • Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 3 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 4 (25)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 5 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 6 (32)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 7 (28)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 8 (36)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 9 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 10 (35)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 11 (39)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 12 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 13 (32)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 14 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(165)
Vietnam(151)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(115)
Supply chain(112)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(97)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(89)
optimization(87)
Artificial intelligence(85)
Financial performance(84)
Sustainability(84)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Factor analysis(78)
Genetic Algorithm(78)
Social media(78)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(66)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(37)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(28)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2190)
Indonesia(1311)
Jordan(813)
India(793)
Vietnam(510)
Saudi Arabia(477)
Malaysia(444)
China(231)
United Arab Emirates(226)
Thailand(160)
United States(114)
Ukraine(110)
Turkey(110)
Egypt(105)
Peru(94)
Canada(92)
Morocco(86)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Engineering Solid Mechanics

ISSN 2291-8752 (Online) - ISSN 2291-8744 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 7 Issue 1 pp. 1-12 , 2019

Effects of cold joints on the structural behaviour of polyurethane rigid foam panels Pages 1-12 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Saeed Nemati, Pezhman Sharafi, Bijan Samali

DOI: 10.5267/j.esm.2018.12.003

Keywords: Foam, Panel, Seam, Tensile strength, Cyclic loading

Abstract: Foam made panels as efficient building elements are becoming a major role player in modular construction with a variety of applications worldwide. However, construction accuracy, technology, and method can have serious effects on the panels’ behavior. In this study, using a unique pneumatic pressure testing rig, bending tests are conducted on the two types of rigid polyurethane panels. The panels are categorized based on the existence of construction cold joints (seams) as S (Seamless) type and TS (Transverse Seams) type. The S type panels are tested under monotonic uniform loading with a maximum nominal pressure of about 1 atm as the witness specimens. The TS panels are tested under both monotonic and cyclic uniform loading, and the deflections-pressure behavior obtained. The results show that S panels could resist up to 0.77 atm under monotonic uniform loading, while the minimum tensile strength of the foam is 13 MPa. In addition, panels with transverse seams collapsed under monotonic and cyclic loads at an average of 0.46 atm and 0.33 atm respectively but at the same position, located on the seamed section, which represent the same failure mode. Based on the results, the seamed section exhibited a maximum tensile strength of about 33.1% of an intact section under monotonic loading; and 27.9% lower results under cyclic loading.

How to cite this paper
Nemati, S., Sharafi, P & Samali, B. (2019). Effects of cold joints on the structural behaviour of polyurethane rigid foam panels.Engineering Solid Mechanics, 7(1), 1-12.

Refrences
ASTM-E1730 (2015). Standard Specification for Rigid Foam for Use in Structural Sandwich Panel Core. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA.
Aliha, M. R. M., Linul, E., Bahmani, A., & Marsavina, L. (2018a). Experimental and theoretical fracture toughness investigation of PUR foams under mixed mode I+ III loading. Polymer Testing, 67, 75-83.
Aliha, M. R. M., Bahmani, A., Linul, E., Marsavina, L., Mousavi S.S., & Mousavi A. (2018b). Investigation of fracture initiation angle and propagation path for PUR foams under mixed mode I/III loading. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on crack path September 2018, Verona, Italy.
Defonseka, C. (2013). Practical guide to flexible polyurethane foams. Smithers Rapra.
Fan, X., Zhao, M., & Wang, T. (2017). Experimental investigation of the fatigue crack propagation in a closed-cell aluminum alloy foam. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 708, 424-431.
Huang, J. S., & Lin, J. Y. (1996). Fatigue of cellular materials. Acta materialia, 44(1), 289-296.
Kanny, K., Mahfuz, H., Carlsson, L. A., Thomas, T., & Jeelani, S. (2002). Dynamic mechanical analyses and flexural fatigue of PVC foams. Composite Structures, 58(2), 175-183.
Kaveh, A., & Sharafi, P. (2007). A simple ant algorithm for profile optimization of sparse matrices. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing), 9(1), 35-46.
Kaveh, A., & Sharafi, P. (2011). Charged system search algorithm for minimax and minisum facility layout problems. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(6), 703-718.
Marsavina, L., Linul, E., Voiconi, T., & Sadowski, T. (2013). A comparison between dynamic and static fracture toughness of polyurethane foams. Polymer Testing, 32(4), 673-680.
Nemati, S., Sharafi, P., Samali, B., Aliabadizadeh, Y., & Saadati, S. (2018). Non-reinforced foam filled modules for rapidly assembled post disaster housing. International Journal of GEOMATE, 14(45), 151-161.
Noble, F. W., & Lilley, J. (1981). Fatigue crack growth in polyurethane foam. Journal of Materials Science, 16(7), 1801-1808.
Poapongsakorn, P., & Kanchanomai, C. (2013). Fatigue crack growth behavior and mechanism of closed‐cell PVC foam. Polymer Engineering & Science, 53(8), 1719-1727.
Sharafi, P., Nemati, S., Samali, B., Bahmani, A., & Khakpour, S. (2018 a). Behavior of integrated connections between adjacent foam-filled modular sandwich panels. Engineering Solid Mechanics, 6(4), 361-370.
Sharafi, P., Nemati, S., Samali, B., Bahmani, A., Khakpour, S., & Aliabadizadeh, Y. (2018 b). Flexural and shear performance of an innovative foam-filled sandwich panel with 3-D high density polyethylene skins. Engineering Solid Mechanics, 6(2), 113-128.
Sharafi, P., Samali, B., Ronagh, H., & Ghodrat, M. (2017). Automated spatial design of multi-story modular buildings using a unified matrix method. Automation in Construction, 82, 31-42.
Shipsha, A., Burman, M., & Zenkert, D. (2000). On mode I fatigue crack growth in foam core materials for sandwich structures. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, 2(2), 103-116.
Toubia, E. A., & Elmushyakhi, A. (2017). Influence of core joints in sandwich composites under in-plane static and fatigue loads. Materials & Design, 131, 102-111.
Wang, L., Limodin, N., El Bartali, A., Witz, J. F., Seghir, R., Buffiere, J. Y., & Charkaluk, E. (2016). Influence of pores on crack initiation in monotonic tensile and cyclic loadings in lost foam casting A319 alloy by using 3D in-situ analysis. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 673, 362-372.
Zenkert, D., & Burman, M. (2009). Tension, compression and shear fatigue of a closed cell polymer foam. Composites Science and Technology, 69(6), 785-792.
Zhao, M. D., Fan, X., Fang, Q. Z., & Wang, T. J. (2015). Experimental investigation of the fatigue of closed-cell aluminum alloy foam. Materials Letters, 160, 68-71.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Engineering Solid Mechanics | Year: 2019 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1 | Views: 1380 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Behavior of integrated connections between adjacent foam-filled modular san ...
  • Edgewise and flatwise compressive behaviour of foam-filled sandwich panels ...
  • Flexural and shear performance of an innovative foam-filled sandwich panel ...
  • Determination of crack growth direction for multiple offset edge cracks of ...
  • Corner point singularities under in-plane and out-of-plane loading: a revie ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com