Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » AHP and fuzzy logic geospatial approach for forest fire vulnerable zones

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (52)

DSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 15 (110)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (37)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Decision Science Letters
ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 11 Issue 4 pp. 399-406, 2022

AHP and fuzzy logic geospatial approach for forest fire vulnerable zones Pages 399-406 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Nawras Shatnawi

📋 Author Affiliations:
N. Shatnawi ORCID 1
1 Surveying and Geomatics Engineering Department, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt, 19117, Jordan
doi 10.5267/j.dsl.2022.8.001
7 Source: Scopus
Crossref 3 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: AHP, Forest Fire, Vulnerable Zones, Digital Terrain Model, GIS, Geospatial Techniques, Fuzzy logic

Abstract: Fires are devastating risky events in forests, having a negative effect on resources, biodiversity, economics, animal life, and putting people in danger. The goal of this study is to use geospatial techniques to identify areas in Jordan that are at risk of forest fires. The research area extends 50 kilometers north and 15 kilometers east from the Dead Sea. The forest fire risk zones map was developed using six factors: land cover class, aspect, proximity to settlements, elevation, slope, and proximity to roads. All of the factors have been selected based on their fire sensitivity or capacity to cause fire. In this study, a Turkish model with fuzzy logic and Analytical hierarchy analysis (AHP) was utilized to classify the area into five categories of risk ranging from very low to very high. According to the findings, approximately 12.12% of the study area is classified as very low risk, 25.54 % is classified as medium risk, while 12.84% is classified as very high risk. Over the last ten years, the map has been confirmed by prior fire occurrences using data from civil defense archives. This conclusion was very useful in gaining an understanding of the geographical distribution of fire-vulnerable zones. The research found that the GIS approach combined with AHP and fuzzy logic is a useful tool for estimating such kinds of maps.


How to cite this paper
APA: Shatnawi, N. (2022). AHP and fuzzy logic geospatial approach for forest fire vulnerable zones. Decision Science Letters, 11(4), 399-406.
Chicago/Turabian: Shatnawi, N. 2022. "AHP and fuzzy logic geospatial approach for forest fire vulnerable zones." Decision Science Letters 11, no. 4 (2022): 399-406.
AMA: Shatnawi, N. AHP and fuzzy logic geospatial approach for forest fire vulnerable zones. Decision Science Letters. 2022;11(4):399-406.

References
Adab, H., Kanniah, K. D., & Solaimani, K. (2013). Modeling forest fire risk in the northeast of Iran using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Natural Hazards, 65(3), 1723-1743.‏
Ajin, R. S., Loghin, A. M., Vinod, P. G., & Jacob, M. K. (2017a). The risk analysis of potential forest fires in a wildlife sanctuary in the western ghats (Southwest Indian Peninsula) using geospatial techniques. International Journal of Health System and Disaster Management, 5(1), 18. 10.4103/ijhsdm.ijhsdm_26_16.
Ajin, R. S., Loghin, A. M., Vinod, P. G., & Jacob, M. K. (2017b). Mapping of forest fire risk zones in Peechi-Vazhani Wildlife Sanctuary, Thrissur, Kerala, India: a study using geospatial techniques. Journal of Wetlands Biodiversity, 7, 7-16.
Ajin, R. S., Loghin, A. M., Karki, A., Vinod, P. G., & Jacob, M. K. (2016). Delineation of forest fire risk zones in Thenmala forest division, Kollam, Kerala, India: A study using geospatial tools. Journal of Wetl Biodivers, 6, 139-48.
Anteur, D., Benaradj, A., Fekir, Y., & Baghdadi, D. (2021). Zakour Forest fire risk map assessment in the commune of Mamounia (Mascara, Algeria). Folia Forestalia Polonica, 63(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2021-0003
Ariapour, A., & Shariff, A. R. B. M. (2014). Rangeland fire risk zonation using remote sensing and geographical information system technologies in Boroujerd Rangelands, Lorestan Province, Iran. Ecopersia, 2(4), 805-818.
Coyle, R. G. (1989). A mission‐orientated approach to defense planning. Defense Analysis, 5(4), 353-367.
Dong, X. U., Li-min, D. A. I., Guo-fan, S., Lei, T., & Hui, W. (2005). Forest fire risk zone mapping from satellite images and GIS for Baihe Forestry Bureau, Jilin, China. Journal of forestry research, 16(3), 169-174. doi:10.1007/bf02856809.
Erten, E., Kurgun, V., & Musaoglu, N. (2004, July). Forest fire risk zone mapping from satellite imagery and GIS: a case study. In XXth Congress of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Istanbul, Turkey (pp. 222-230).
Eskandari, S. (2017). A new approach for forest fire risk modeling using fuzzy AHP and GIS in Hyrcanian forests of Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10(8), 1-13.
Gheshlaghi, H. A. (2019). Using GIS to develop a model for forest fire risk mapping. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 47(7), 1173-1185.‏
Hasheminasab, S. A., Pirnazar, M., Hasheminasab, S. H. Z., Karimi, A., Eslamian, S. N., Ostad-Ali-Askari, K., ... & Mirkhalafi, A. (2017). Fire risk potential checking in forests using fire risk model. International Journal of Construction Resources and Civil Engineering, 3, 67-75. 10.20431/2454-8693.0304006.
Jamhawi, M. M., & Hajahjah, Z. A. (2017). A bottom-up approach for cultural tourism management in the old city of As-Salt, Jordan. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 91-106. 10.1108/JCHMSD-07-2015-0027.
Kumari, B., & Pandey, A. C. (2020). Geo-informatics based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) through analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for forest fire risk mapping in Palamau Tiger Reserve, Jharkhand state, India. Journal of Earth System Science, 129(1), 1-16. Doi: 10.1007/s12040-020-01461-6.
Mamdani, E. H., & Assilian, S. (1975). An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International journal of man-machine studies, 7(1), 1-13.
Morales-Hidalgo, D., Oswalt, S. N., & Somanathan, E. (2015). Status and trends in global primary forest, protected areas, and areas designated for conservation of biodiversity from the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. Forest Ecology and Management, 352, 68–77. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.011
Bentekhici, N., Bellal, S. A., & Zegrar, A. (2020). Contribution of remote sensing and GIS to mapping the fire risk of Mediterranean forest case of the forest massif of Tlemcen (North-West Algeria). Natural Hazards, 104(1), 811-831. 10.1007/s11069-020-04191-6.
PSD (2020) Archives of the general directorate of civil defense in Jordan. Available on: https://www.psd.gov.jo/
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
Youcef, F., Khalladi, M., Mohamed, L., Amine, H. M., & Djamel, A. (2020). Assessment of Forest Fire Risk and Forestry Species Degradation using GIS and Remote Sensing in Western of Algeria. Plant Archives, 20(2), 1793-1800.
Zadeh, L. A. (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Science, 8, 199–249
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Decision Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2022 | 📖 Volume: 11 | 📄 Issue: 4 | 👁️ Views: 1351 | 📊 Crossref: 3

Related Articles:
  • The role of wildfires in a sustainable future
  • Design and kinematic simulation of automated mechanism for shallot planting
  • A survey on the effects of bumpy road on the vibration of multi-purpose forest fire fighting vehicle
  • Prioritization of strategies for protected area management with local people using the hybrid SWOT-AHP analysis: the case of Kakum conservation area, Ghana
  • Strategic planning for waste management: A case study of Shiraz waste management

📝 Ready to share your research?

Decision Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com