Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » Investigating the agricultural losses due to climate variability: An application of conditional value-at-risk approach

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (528)
  • USCM (1099)
  • ESM (421)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (293)
  • IJDS (952)
  • JFS (101)
  • HE (37)
  • SCI (36)

DSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
    • Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • Volume 15 (41)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (22)

Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(165)
Vietnam(151)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(115)
Supply chain(112)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(97)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(89)
optimization(87)
Sustainability(87)
Artificial intelligence(86)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(79)
Social media(78)
Factor analysis(78)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(66)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(37)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2198)
Indonesia(1311)
Jordan(815)
India(798)
Vietnam(510)
Saudi Arabia(478)
Malaysia(446)
China(231)
United Arab Emirates(226)
Thailand(160)
United States(115)
Turkey(112)
Ukraine(110)
Egypt(106)
Peru(94)
Canada(93)
Morocco(86)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Decision Science Letters

ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 10 Issue 1 pp. 71-78 , 2021

Investigating the agricultural losses due to climate variability: An application of conditional value-at-risk approach Pages 71-78 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Sukono Sukono, Riaman Riaman, Sudradjat Supian, Yuyun Hidayat, Jumadil Saputra, Diantiny Mariam Pribadi

DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2020.10.002

Keywords: Allocation of agricultural land, Climate variable, Crop insurance, Optimization, Risk measure, Optimal Decision

Abstract: The agricultural sector is directly affected by climate variables. The presence of climate variability causes a considerable risk to agricultural productivities. Thus, risk management is an alternative to reduce risks, including optimizing the allocation of farmland and choosing crop insurance for a specific planting date. The purpose of this study is to investigate the agricultural risk management through risk measure of climate variability using the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) in rice production. This paper investigated several possible considerations of agricultural insurance premiums based on losses climate index. We concluded that the climate index insurance policy is the best choice that farmers can choose for each planting date, the higher the significance value considered, the more the value of Value-at-Risk and Conditional Value-at-Risk.

How to cite this paper
Sukono, S., Riaman, R., Supian, S., Hidayat, Y., Saputra, J & Pribadi, D. (2021). Investigating the agricultural losses due to climate variability: An application of conditional value-at-risk approach.Decision Science Letters , 10(1), 71-78.

Refrences
Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. M., & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203-228.
Azad, N., Zangeneh, G., SeyedAliAkbar, S., & Valipour, A. (2013). A survey on critical factors influencing agricultural insurance. Management Science Letters, 3(1), 237-242.
Berg, E., & Schmitz, B. (2007). Weather-based instruments in the context of whole farm risk management (No. 686-2016-47135).
Cabrera, V. E., Fraisse, C. W., Letson, D., Podestá, G., & Novak, J. (2006). Impact of climate information on reducing farm risk by optimizing crop insurance strategy. Transactions of the ASABE, 49(4), 1223-1233.
Cabrera, V. E., Solis, D., & Letson, D. (2009). Optimal crop insurance under climate variability: contrasting insurer and farmer interests. Transactions of the ASABE, 52(2), 623-631.
Caruso, R., Petrarca, I., & Ricciuti, R. (2016). Climate change, rice crops, and violence: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Peace Research, 53(1), 66-83.
Jain, V., & Dharmaraja, S. (2019). Crop insurance in India: a mathematical review. In Operations Research in Development Sector (pp. 97-107). Springer, Singapore.
Kawanishi, M., & Mimura, N. (2015). Assessment of insurance for paddy production: a case study in Indonesia. Climate and Development, 7(3), 257-266.
Krokhmal, P., Palmquist, J., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints. Journal of Risk, 4, 43-68.
Liu, J., Men, C., Cabrera, V. E., Uryasev, S., & Fraisse, C. W. (2008). Optimizing crop insurance under climate variability. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 47(10), 2572-2580..
Ochieng, J., Kirimi, L., & Mathenge, M. (2016). Effects of climate variability and change on agricultural production: The case of small scale farmers in Kenya. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 77, 71-78..
Pasaribu S. M., & Sudiyanto A. (2016): Agricultural risk management: lesson learned from the application of rice crop insurance in Indonesia. In: Kaneko S., Kawanishi M. (eds) Climate Change Policies and Challenges in Indonesia. Springer, Tokyo.
Pasaribu, S. M. (2010). Developing rice farm insurance in Indonesia. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 1, 33-41.
Quaranta, A. G., & Zaffaroni, A. (2008). Robust optimization of conditional value at risk and portfolio selection. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(10), 2046-2056.
Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 2, 21-42.
Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Conditional value-at-risk for genereal loss distributions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26, 1443-1471.
Tong, X., Qi, L., Wu, F., & Zhou, H. (2010). A smoothing method for solving portfolio optimization with CVaR and applications in allocation of generation asset. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 216(6), 1723-1740.
Wang, C. P., & Huang, H. H. (2016). Optimal insurance contract under VaR and CVaR constraints. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 37, 110-127.
Yoshioka, N. (2017), A reconsideration of crop insurance as climate change adaptation approach. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 8(22), 1-8.
Zhu S., & Fukushima M. (2009). Worst-case conditional value-at-risk with application to robust portfolio management. Operations Research, 57(5), 1155-1168.
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Decision Science Letters | Year: 2021 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 1 | Views: 1695 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • A utility theory approach for insurance pricing
  • A comparative study on value at risk versus TEFIX 30: Evidence from Tehran ...
  • An optimization technique for cropping patterns and land consolidation: A c ...
  • A survey on critical factors influencing agricultural insurance
  • Determination of the optimal investment portfolio using CAPM in Tehran Stoc ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com