Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » Fuzzy decision analysis for project scope change management

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (52)

DSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 15 (110)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (37)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Decision Science Letters
ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 6 Issue 4 pp. 395-406, 2017

Fuzzy decision analysis for project scope change management Pages 395-406 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Farshad Shirazi, Hamed Kazemipoor, Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam

📋 Author Affiliations:
F. Shirazi1, H. Kazemipoor ORCID 2, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam ORCID 3
1 Department of Industrial Engineering, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
doi 10.5267/j.dsl.2017.1.003
18 Source: Scopus
Crossref 12 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Project scope management, Scope change, Scope Control, Fuzzy Logic, Strategy

Abstract: It is very important to manage and control projects with the consideration of the triple constraints; namely time, cost and scope. It is also extremely important to manage the scope and all the procurements needed to complete any project. During the project’s lifecycle many changes take place, either positively or negatively, which should be controlled. If the changes are not controlled we may have scope creep that has negative effect on the project. It is commonly considered a negative incident, and thus, should be kept away from the project. By considering this concept, in this paper, we discuss scope change and managing scope and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process is used in selecting the best strategy to manage scope change in projects.

How to cite this paper
APA: Shirazi, F., Kazemipoor, H & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2017). Fuzzy decision analysis for project scope change management. Decision Science Letters, 6(4), 395-406.
Chicago/Turabian: Shirazi, F., Kazemipoor, H & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. 2017. "Fuzzy decision analysis for project scope change management." Decision Science Letters 6, no. 4 (2017): 395-406.
AMA: Shirazi, F., Kazemipoor, H & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. Fuzzy decision analysis for project scope change management. Decision Science Letters. 2017;6(4):395-406.

References
Alsudiri, T., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Eldabi, T. (2013). Alignment of large project management process to business strategy: A review and conceptual framework. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 26(5), 596-615.
Artto, K., Kujala, J., Dietrich, P., & Martinsuo, M. (2008). What is project strategy?. International Journal of Project Management, 26(1), 4-12.
Cooke-Davies, T. (2002). The “real” success factors on projects. International journal of project management, 20(3), 185-190.
Crawford, L., & Nahmias, A. H. (2010). Competencies for managing change. International journal of project management, 28(4), 405-412.
Crawford, L., Hobbs, J. B., & Turner, J. R. (2006). Aligning capability with strategy: Categorizing projects to do the right projects and to do them right. Project Management Journal, 37(2).
De Reyck, B., Grushka-Cockayne, Y., Lockett, M., Calderini, S. R., Moura, M., & Sloper, A. (2005). The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(7), 524-537.
Duggal, J. S. (2010). Next Level Up: How Do You Measure Project Success? Rethinking the Triple Constraint. Project Management Institute Community Post.
Eriksson, P. E. (2013). Exploration and exploitation in project-based organizations: Development and diffusion of knowledge at different organizational levels in construction companies. International Journal of Project Management, 31(3), 333-341.
Fan, Y., Miyagi, H., & Yamashita, K. (1998, October). Decision-making problem with the vague criteria based on the fuzzy relation equation. In Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1998. 1998 IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 3, pp. 2574-2578). IEEE.
Guide, A. (2013). Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® GUIDE). In Project Management Institute.
Hauc, A., & Kovač, J. (2000). Project management in strategy implementation—experiences in Slovenia. International Journal of Project Management, 18(1), 61-67.
Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Lehtonen, P., & Martinsuo, M. (2009). Integrating the change program with the parent organization. International Journal of Project Management, 27(2), 154-165.
MAPNA Integrated management system procedures
Meredith, J. R., & Mantel Jr, S. J. (2011). Project management: a managerial approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Meskendahl, S. (2010). The influence of business strategy on project portfolio management and its success—a conceptual framework. International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), 807-817.Miller, D. (2001). Successful change leaders: what makes them? What do they do that is different?. Journal of Change Management, 2(4), 359-368.
Mon, D. L., Cheng, C. H., & Lin, J. C. (1994). Evaluating weapon system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on entropy weight. Fuzzy sets and systems, 62(2), 127-134.
Morris, P., & Jamieson, A. (2005). Moving from corporate strategy to project strategy. Project Management Journal, 36(4), 5-18.
Patanakul, P., & Shenhar, A. J. (2012). What project strategy really is: The fundamental building block in strategic project management. Project Management Journal, 43(1), 4-20.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitiw strategy.
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International journal of forecasting, 15(4), 353-375.
Shenhar, A. J., Milosevic, D., & Dvir, D. (2000). Linking project management to business strategy. Project Management Institute.
Shi, Q. (2011). Rethinking the implementation of project management: A Value Adding Path Map approach. International Journal of Project Management, 29(3), 295-302.
Srivannaboon, S. A. B. I. N., & Milosevic, D. Z. (2006). A theoretical framework for aligning project management with business strategy. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 98-110.
Srivannaboon, S., & Milosevic, D. Z. (2006). A two-way influence between business strategy and project management. International journal of project management, 24(6), 493-505.
Stummer, M., & Zuchi, D. (2010). Developing roles in change processes–A case study from a public sector organisation. International Journal of Project Management, 28(4), 384-394.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 9-26.
Sun, M., & Meng, X. (2009). Taxonomy for change causes and effects in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 27(6), 560-572.
Thomas, J., & Mengel, T. (2008). Preparing project managers to deal with complexity–Advanced project management education. International Journal of Project Management, 26(3), 304-315.
Wheelen, T. L., & David, J. (2002). Hunger. Strategic Management and Business Policy.
Yeh, C. H., & Deng, H. (1997, October). An algorithm for fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. In Intelligent Processing Systems, 1997. ICIPS'97. 1997 IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 1564-1568). IEEE.
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Decision Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2017 | 📖 Volume: 6 | 📄 Issue: 4 | 👁️ Views: 8240 | 📊 Crossref: 12

Related Articles:
  • Diagnosing the success of the construction projects during the initial phases
  • Identifying program critical success factors in construction industry
  • Investigating different challenges in construction projects
  • An empirical study for ranking risk factors using linear assignment: A case study of road construction
  • A two level DEA in project based organizations

📝 Ready to share your research?

Decision Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com