Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » A decision-making model for non-traditional machining processes selection

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (52)
  • SCI (52)

DSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 15 (110)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (37)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
Sustainability(93)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
Trust(85)
TOPSIS(85)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Decision Science Letters
ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 3 Issue 4 pp. 467-478, 2014

A decision-making model for non-traditional machining processes selection Pages 467-478 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Kanika Prasad, Shankar Chakraborty

📋 Author Affiliations:
K. Prasad ORCID , S. Chakraborty ORCID
¹ Department of Production Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata - 700 032, West Bengal, India
doi 10.5267/j.dsl.2014.7.002
16 Source: Scopus
Crossref 10 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Decision making, Expert system, Non-traditional machining process, Quality function deployment

Abstract: Non-traditional machining (NTM) refers to a variety of thermal, chemical, electrical and mechanical material removal processes, developed to generate complex and intricate shapes in advanced engineering materials with high strength-to-weight ratio. Selection of the optimal NTM process for generating a desired feature on a given material requires the consideration of several factors among which the type of the work material and shape to be machined are the most significant ones. Presence of a large number of NTM processes along with their complex characteristics and capabilities, and lack of experts in NTM process selection domain compel for development of a structured approach for NTM process selection for a given machining application. Thus, the objective of this paper is set to develop a decision-making model in Visual BASIC 6.0 to automate the NTM process selection procedure with the help of graphical user interface and visual decision aids. It is also integrated with quality function deployment technique to correlate the customers’ requirements (product characteristics) with technical requirements (process characteristics). Four illustrative examples are also provided to demonstrate the potentiality of the developed model in solving NTM process selection problems.

How to cite this paper
APA: Prasad, K & Chakraborty, S. (2014). A decision-making model for non-traditional machining processes selection. Decision Science Letters, 3(4), 467-478.
Chicago/Turabian: Prasad, K & Chakraborty, S. 2014. "A decision-making model for non-traditional machining processes selection." Decision Science Letters 3, no. 4 (2014): 467-478.
AMA: Prasad, K & Chakraborty, S. A decision-making model for non-traditional machining processes selection. Decision Science Letters. 2014;3(4):467-478.

References
Akao, Y. (1990). Quality Function Deployment, Cambridge. MA: Productivity Press.

Chakraborty, S., & Dey, S. (2006). Design of an analytic-hierarchy-process-based expert system for non-traditional machining process selection. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 31(5-6), 490-500.

Chakraborty, S., & Dey, S. (2007). QFD-based expert system for non-traditional machining processes selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1208-1217.

Chakraborty, S. (2011). Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54(9-12), 1155-1166.

Chan, L-K., & Wu, M-L. (2002). Quality function deployment: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(3), 463-497.

Chan, L-K., & Wu, M-L. (2005). A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example. Omega, 33(2), 119-139.

Chatterjee, P., & Chakraborty, S. (2013). Nontraditional machining processes selection using evaluation of mixed data method. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68(5-8), 1613-1626.

Co?un, C. (1993). Computer-aided system for selection of nontraditional machining operations. Computers in Industry, 22(2), 169-179.

Das, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2011). Selection of non-traditional machining processes using analytic network process. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 30(1), 41-53.

Das Chakladar, N., & Chakraborty, S. (2008). A combined TOPSIS-AHP-method-based approach for non-traditional machining processes selection. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 222(12), 1613-1623.

Das Chakladar, N., Das, R., & Chakraborty, S. (2009). A digraph-based expert system for non-traditional machining processes selection. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 43(3-4), pp. 226-237.

Edison Chandrasselan, R., Jehadeesan, R., & Raajenthiren, M. (2008). Web-based knowledge base system for selection of non-traditional machining processes. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 21(1), 45-56.

Govers C.P.M. (1996). What and how about quality function deployment (QFD). International Journal of Production Economics, 46-47, 575-585.

Hauser, J.R., & Clausing, O. (1988). The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 63-73.

Jain, V.K. (2005). Advanced Machining Processes. New Delhi: Allied Publishers Pvt. Limited.
Karande, P., & Chakraborty, S. (2012a). Application of PROMETHEE-GAIA method for non-traditional machining processes selection. Management Science Letters, 2(6), 2049-2060.

Karande, P., & Chakraborty, S. (2012b). A reference point-based approach for non-traditional machining process selection. Proceedings of the 4th International and 25th AIMTDR Conference, India, 1247-1252.

Pandey, P.C., & Shan, H.S. (1981). Modern Machining Processes. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Com. Ltd.

Sadhu, A., & Chakraborty, S. (2011). Non-traditional machining processes selection using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 8770-8781.

Temuçin, T., Tozan, H., Vayvay, ?., Harni??rov?, M., & Val??ek, J. (2014). A fuzzy based decision model for nontraditional machining process selection. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 70(9-12), 2275-2282.

Yurdakul, M., & Co?un, C. (2003). Development of a multi-attribute selection procedure for non-traditional machining processes. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217(7), pp. 993-1009.
  • 85
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Decision Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2014 | 📖 Volume: 3 | 📄 Issue: 4 | 👁️ Views: 2653 | 📊 Crossref: 10

Related Articles:
  • Application of multi-stage Monte Carlo method for solving machining optimization problems
  • Differential search algorithm-based parametric optimization of electrochemical micromachining processes
  • Selecting equipment using a hybrid of AHP and PROMETHEE
  • Non-conventional optimization techniques in optimizing non-traditional machining processes: A review
  • Application of PROMETHEE-GAIA method for non-traditional machining processes selection

📝 Ready to share your research?

Decision Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com