Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » Application of multi-stage Monte Carlo method for solving machining optimization problems

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

IJIEC Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 17 (113)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (26)
      • Issue 4 (36)
    • ▼ Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (77)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 5 Issue 4 pp. 647-659, 2014

Application of multi-stage Monte Carlo method for solving machining optimization problems Pages 647-659 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Miloš Madić, Marko Kovačević, Miroslav Radovanović

📋 Author Affiliations:
Miloš Madić ORCID , Marko Kovačević, Miroslav Radovanović ORCID
¹ University of Niš, Niš, A. Medvedeva 14, Serbia, N/A
doi 10.5267/j.ijiec.2014.7.002
6 Source: Scopus
Crossref 3 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Machining, Meta-heuristics, Monte Carlo method, Multi-stage, Optimization

Abstract: Enhancing the overall machining performance implies optimization of machining processes, i.e. determination of optimal machining parameters combination. Optimization of machining processes is an active field of research where different optimization methods are being used to determine an optimal combination of different machining parameters. In this paper, multi-stage Monte Carlo (MC) method was employed to determine optimal combinations of machining parameters for six machining processes, i.e. drilling, turning, turn-milling, abrasive waterjet machining, electrochemical discharge machining and electrochemical micromachining. Optimization solutions obtained by using multi-stage MC method were compared with the optimization solutions of past researchers obtained by using meta-heuristic optimization methods, e.g. genetic algorithm, simulated annealing algorithm, artificial bee colony algorithm and teaching learning based optimization algorithm. The obtained results prove the applicability and suitability of the multi-stage MC method for solving machining optimization problems with up to four independent variables. Specific features, merits and drawbacks of the MC method were also discussed.

How to cite this paper
APA: Madić, M., Kovačević, M & Radovanović, M. (2014). Application of multi-stage Monte Carlo method for solving machining optimization problems. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 5(4), 647-659.
Chicago/Turabian: Madić, M., Kovačević, M & Radovanović, M. 2014. "Application of multi-stage Monte Carlo method for solving machining optimization problems." International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 5, no. 4 (2014): 647-659.
AMA: Madić, M., Kovačević, M & Radovanović, M. Application of multi-stage Monte Carlo method for solving machining optimization problems. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 2014;5(4):647-659.

References
Besseris, G. J. (2008). Multi-response optimisation using Taguchi method and super ranking concept. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management,19(8), 1015-1029.

Besseris, G. J. (2008). Multi-response optimisation using Taguchi method and super ranking concept. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management,19(8), 1015-1029.

Cayda?, U., & Hasçal?k, A. (2008). A study on surface roughness in abrasive waterjet machining process using artificial neural networks and regression analysis method. Journal of materials processing technology, 202(1), 574-582.

Davim, J. P. (2001). A note on the determination of optimal cutting conditions for surface finish obtained in turning using design of experiments. Journal of materials processing technology, 116(2), 305-308.

Dhavlikar, M. N., Kulkarni, M. S., & Mariappan, V. (2003). Combined Taguchi and dual response method for optimization of a centerless grinding operation.Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 132(1), 90-94.

Khayet, M., & Cojocaru, C. (2012). Artificial neural network modeling and optimization of desalination by air gap membrane distillation. Separation and Purification Technology, 86, 171-182.

Kilickap, E., Huseyinoglu, M., & Yardimeden, A. (2011). Optimization of drilling parameters on surface roughness in drilling of AISI 1045 using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52(1-4), 79-88.

Kova?evi?, M., Madi?, M., & Radovanovi?, M. (2013). Software prototype for validation of machining optimization solutions obtained with meta-heuristic algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(17), 6985-6996.

Kroese, D. P., Taimre, T., & Botev, Z. I. (2011). Handbook of Monte Carlo Methods (Vol. 706). John Wiley & Sons.

Madi?, M., Markovi?, D., & Radovanovi?, M. (2013). Comparison of meta-heuristic algorithms for solving machining optimization problems. Facta universitatis-series: Mechanical Engineering, 11(1), 29-44.

Madi?, M., & Radovanovi?, M. (2014a). Possibilities of using Monte Carlo method for solving machining optimization problems. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 12(1), 27-36.

Madi? M, Radovanovi? M (2014b) Optimization of machining processes using pattern search algorithm. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 5(2), 223–234.

Mosegaard, K., & Sambridge, M. (2002). Monte Carlo analysis of inverse problems. Inverse Problems, 18(3), 29-34.

Mukherjee, I., & Ray, P. K. (2006). A review of optimization techniques in metal cutting processes. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 50(1), 15-34.

Munda, J., & Bhattacharyya, B. (2008). Investigation into electrochemical micromachining (EMM) through response surface methodology based approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,35(7-8), 821-832.

Rao, R. V., Pawar, P. J., & Shankar, R. (2008). Multi-objective optimization of electrochemical machining process parameters using a particle swarm optimization algorithm. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 222(8), 949-958.

Rao, R. V., & Pawar, P. J. (2009). Modelling and optimization of process parameters of wire electrical discharge machining. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 223(11), 1431-1440.

Venkata Rao, R., & Pawar, P. J. (2010). Parameter optimization of a multi-pass milling process using non-traditional optimization algorithms. Applied soft computing, 10(2), 445-456.

Rao, R. V., & Kalyankar, V. D. (2011). Parameters optimization of advanced machining processes using TLBO algorithm. EPPM, Singapore, 20, 21–31

Venkata Rao, R., & Kalyankar, V. D. (2013). Parameter optimization of modern machining processes using teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(1), 524-531.

Samanta, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2011). Parametric optimization of some non-traditional machining processes using artificial bee colony algorithm. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 24(6), 946-957.

Sarkar, B. R., Doloi, B., & Bhattacharyya, B. (2006). Parametric analysis on electrochemical discharge machining of silicon nitride ceramics. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28(9-10), 873-881.

Savas, V., & Ozay, C. (2008). The optimization of the surface roughness in the process of tangential turn-milling using genetic algorithm. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 37(3-4), 335-340.

Yang, X. S. (2010). Engineering optimization: an introduction with metaheuristic applications. John Wiley & Sons.

Y?ld?z, A. R. (2009). A novel particle swarm optimization approach for product design and manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 40(5-6), 617-628.

Yusup, N., Zain, A. M., & Hashim, S. Z. M. (2012). Evolutionary techniques in optimizing machining parameters: Review and recent applications (2007–2011).Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 9909-9927.

Yusup, N., Sarkheyli, A., Zain, A. M., Hashim, S. Z. M., & Ithnin, N. (2013). Estimation of optimal machining control parameters using artificial bee colony.Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1-10.

Zain, A. M., Haron, H., & Sharif, S. (2011). Genetic algorithm and simulated annealing to estimate optimal process parameters of the abrasive waterjet machining. Engineering with computers, 27(3), 251-259.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | 📅 Year: 2014 | 📖 Volume: 5 | 📄 Issue: 4 | 👁️ Views: 3087 | 📊 Crossref: 3

Related Articles:
  • Multiple characteristics optimization in machining of GFRP composites using Grey relational analysis
  • Optimization of machining processes using pattern search algorithm
  • Differential search algorithm-based parametric optimization of electrochemical micromachining processes
  • Analysis of machining characteristics in drilling of GFRP composite with application of fuzzy logic approach
  • Non-conventional optimization techniques in optimizing non-traditional machining processes: A review

📝 Ready to share your research?

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com