Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Journal of Project Management » MCDM approach to investigate the effectiveness of SCRUM events in minimizing risk factors in project management

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

JPM Volumes

    • Volume 1 (8)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (3)
    • Volume 2 (13)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (3)
      • Issue 3 (3)
      • Issue 4 (3)
    • Volume 3 (17)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)
    • Volume 4 (24)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (4)
    • Volume 5 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 6 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 7 (21)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 8 (21)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 9 (35)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • Volume 10 (68)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (21)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (19)
    • Volume 11 (24)
      • Issue 1 (24)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(110)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Sustainability(81)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Artificial intelligence(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2183)
Indonesia(1290)
India(787)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Journal of Project Management

ISSN 2371-8374 (Online) - ISSN 2371-8366 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 8 Issue 4 pp. 227-238 , 2023

MCDM approach to investigate the effectiveness of SCRUM events in minimizing risk factors in project management Pages 227-238 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: G. Nilay Yücenur

DOI: 10.5267/j.jpm.2023.7.001

Keywords: Agile project management, SCRUM events, MCDM

Abstract: Traditional project management methods have been used for many years in the implementation and management of projects. With the publication of the agile manifesto in 2001, the interest in agile methods increased and successful results were obtained in the execution and solution of complex projects with agile approaches. Agile approach consists of different structures that can be named as framework or method. Among these agile methods, which are selected and applied according to the suitability and purpose of the project, the most frequently preferred one is SCRUM. In this study, SCRUM, an agile project management technique that has been used frequently in recent years in order to develop a flexible project management process, has been examined, and the effectiveness of the events of the SCRUM technique in minimizing the risks that arise in project management has been evaluated. Determining the effectiveness of these SCRUM events, which each agile project team implements in turn, is very important for the correct and effective allocation of resources. For this purpose, a multi-criteria decision-making model has been proposed to evaluate the effectiveness of 4 SCRUM events within the scope of this study. While the importance weights of the 24 project management risk factors proposed in the solution phase of the created model were determined by the SWARA method, the SCRUM events were evaluated with the WASPAS, COPRAS and EDAS methods and the solution values found by three different methods were compared.

How to cite this paper
Yücenur, G. (2023). MCDM approach to investigate the effectiveness of SCRUM events in minimizing risk factors in project management.Journal of Project Management, 8(4), 227-238.

Refrences
Behera, N. C., Jeet, S., Nayak, C. K., Bagal, D. K., Panda, S. N., & Barua, A. (2022). Parametric appraisal of strength & hardness of resin compacted sand castings using hybrid Taguchi-WASPAS-Material Generation Algorithm. Ma-terails Today: Proceedings, 50(5), 1226-1233.
Borandağ, E., & Yücalar, F. (2020). SCRUM task board application with augmented reality. International Journal of Management Information Systems and Computer Science, 4(1), 1-12.
Buganova, K., & Simickova, J. (2019). Risk management in traditional and agile project management. Transportation Research Procedia, 40, 986–993.
Cano, E. L., Garcia-Camus, J. M., Garzas, J., Moguerza, J. M., & Sanchez, N. N. (2021). A Scrum-based framework for new product development in the non-software industry. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 61, 101634.
Cheng, C. H., Chang, J. R., & Ho, T. H. (2006). Dynamic fuzzy OWA model for evaluating the risks of software devel-opment. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 37(8), 791-813.
Dhir, S., Kumar, D., & Singh, V. B. (2018). Success and Failure Factors that Impact on Project Implementation Using Agile Software Development Methodology. Software Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 731.
Elzamly, A., Hussin, B., & Salleh, N. M. (2016). Top Fifty Software Risk Factors and the Best Thirty Risk Management Techniques in Software Development Lifecycle for Successful Software Projects. International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology, 9(6), 11-32.
Endres, M., Bican, P. M., & Wöllner, T. (2022). Sustainability meets agile: Using Scrum to develop frugal innovations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 347, 130871.
Galli, B. J. (2018). Risks Management in Agile New Product Development Project Environments: A Review of Litera-ture. International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management, 7(4), 37-67.
Garcia, L. A., OliveiraJr, E., & Morandini, M. (2022). Tailoring the Scrum framework for software development: Lit-erature mapping and feature-based support. Information and Software Technology, 146, 106814.
Gemino, A., Reich, B. H., & Serrador, P. M. (2020). Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success: Is Hybrid a Poor Second Choice? Project Management Journal, 52(2), 161-175.
Houston, D. X., Mackulak, G. T., Collofello, J. S. (2001). Stochastic simulation of risk factor potential effects for soft-ware development risk management. The Journal of Systems and Software, 59, 247-257.
Hron, M., & Obwegeser, N. (2022). Why and how is Scrum being adapted in practice: A systematic review. Journal of Systems and Software, 183, 111110.
Jiang, J., & Klein, G. (2000). Software development risks to project effectiveness. The Journal of Systems and Software, 52, 3-10.
Kandi, B. P., Jeet, S., Bagal, D. K., Barua, A., Bhoi, S., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2022). Mechanical characterization of quenched hardened chromoly steel using taguchi coupled WASPAS method. Materails Today: Proceedings, 50(5), 2321-2327.
Kumar, C., & Yadav, D. K. (2015). A Probabilistic Software Risk Assessment and Estimation Model for Software Pro-jects. Procedia Computer Science, 54, 353-361.
Lalmi, A., Fernandes, G., & Boudemagh, S. S. (2022). Synergy between Traditional, Agile and Lean management ap-proaches in construction projects: bibliometric analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 196, 732–739.
Loiro, C., Castrp, H., Avila, P., Cruz-Cunha, M. M., Putnik, G. D., & Ferreira, L. (2019). Agile Project Management: A Communicational Workflow Proposal. Procedia Computer Science, 164, 485–490.
Mamaghani, E. J., & Medini, K. (2021). Resilience, agility and risk management in production ramp-up. Procedia, 103, 37–41.
Mamoghli, S., Goepp, V., & Botta-Genoulaz, V. (2018). An approach for the management of the risk factors impacting the model-based engineering methods in ERP projects. IFAC PapersOnLine, 51(11), 1206–1211.
Marnada, P., Raharjo, T., Hardian, B., & Prasetyo, A. (2022). Agile project management challenge in handling scope and change: A systematic literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 197, 290–300.
Menezes, J. Jr., Gusmao, C., & Moura, H. (2019). Risk factors in software development projects: a systematic literature review. Software Quality Journal, 27, 1149–1174.
Nakatsu, R. T., & Iacovou, C. L. (2009). A comparative study of important risk factors involved in offshore and domes-tic outsourcing of software development projects: A two-panel Delphi study. Information & Management, 46, 57–68.
Patanakul, P., & Rufo-McCarron, R. (2018). Transitioning to agile software development: Lessons learned from a gov-ernment-contracted program. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(2), 181-192.
Patil, S. B., Patole, T. A., Jadhav, R. S., Suryawanshi, S. S., & Raykar, S. J. (2022). Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) based Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) paradigm for hard turning process parameters. Ma-terails Today: Proceedings, doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.142.
Petersen, K., & Wohlin, C. (2009). A comparison of issues and advantages in agile and incremental development be-tween state of the art and an industrial case. The Journal of Systems and Software, 82, 1479–1490.
Shrivastava, S. V., & Rathod, U. (2017). A risk management framework for distributed agile projects. Information and Software Technology, 85, 1-15.
Tavares, B. G., Sanches da Silva, C. E., & Diniz de Souza A. (2019). Practices to Improve Risk Management in Agile Projects. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 29(3), 381-399.
Vallon, R., Estacio, B. J. S., Prikladnicki, R., & Grechenig, T. (2018). Systematic literature review on agile practices in global software development. Information and Software Technology, 96, 161-180.
Yazdani, M., Torkayesh, A. E., Santibanez-Gonzalez, E. DR., & Otaghsara, S. K. (2020). Evaluation of renewable ener-gy resources using integrated Shannon Entropy-EDAS model. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 1, 35-42.
Yazdi, A. K., Wanke, P. F., Hanne, T., Abdi, F., & Sarfaraz, A. H. (2022). Supplier selection in the oil & gas industry: A comprehensive approach for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 79, 101142.
Yücenur, G. N., Çaylak, Ş., Gönül, G., & Postalcıoğlu, M. (2020). An integrated solution with SWARA&COPRAS methods in renewable energy production: City selection for biogas facility. Renewable Energy, 145, 2587-2597.
https://scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v1/Scrum-Guide-TR.pdf. Arrival date: 22.03.2023.
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Journal of Project Management | Year: 2023 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4 | Views: 1533 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • A risk management model for large projects in the construction phase in Egy ...
  • Risk and its impacts on time and cost in construction projects
  • The advantage of project risk management tools
  • A feasibility study for using agile contractors to promote mass housing con ...
  • Investigating the effects of different factors on development of open sourc ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com