Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » A multi period portfolio selection using chance constrained programming

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (562)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2648)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (48)
  • SCI (50)

DSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 15 (73)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (32)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (1)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (57)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Decision Science Letters
ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 6 Issue 3 pp. 221-232, 2017

A multi period portfolio selection using chance constrained programming Pages 221-232 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Khadijeh Hassanlou

📋 Author Affiliations:
K. Hassanlou1
1 School of Industrial Engineering, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran
doi 10.5267/j.dsl.2017.1.001
4 Source: Scopus
Crossref 5 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Chance constrained programming, Multi period portfolio selection, Fuzzy programming

Abstract: This paper considers a portfolio selection problem with normally distributed returns and different rates for borrowing and lending. The primary concern is to determine the amount of investment in different planning horizons when the rate of borrowing is greater than the rate of lending. Chance constrained programming as an appropriate tool for addressing intrinsic uncertainty in portfolio selection problem is used. To solve this nonlinear programming, Genetic Algorithm is utilized. Numerical experiments are performed and the results are analyzed to present the performance of the proposed methodology.

How to cite this paper
APA: Hassanlou, K. (2017). A multi period portfolio selection using chance constrained programming. Decision Science Letters, 6(3), 221-232.
Chicago/Turabian: Hassanlou, K. 2017. "A multi period portfolio selection using chance constrained programming." Decision Science Letters 6, no. 3 (2017): 221-232.
AMA: Hassanlou, K. A multi period portfolio selection using chance constrained programming. Decision Science Letters. 2017;6(3):221-232.

References
Abdelaziz, F. B., Aouni, B., & El Fayedh, R. (2007). Multi-objective stochastic programming for portfolio selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1811-1823.
Ammar, E., & Khalifa, H. A. (2003). Fuzzy portfolio optimization a quadratic programming approach. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 18(5), 1045-1054.
Aouni, B., Abdelaziz, F. B., & El-Fayedh, R. (2000). Chance constrained compromise programming for portfolio selection. Laboratoire LARODEC, Institut Superieur de Gestion, La Bardo.
Asanga, S., Asimit, A., Badescu, A., & Haberman, S. (2014). Portfolio optimization under solvency constraints: a dynamical approach. North American Actuarial Journal, 18(3), 394-416.
Bertsimas, D., & Pachamanova, D. (2008). Robust multiperiod portfolio management in the presence of transaction costs. Computers & Operations Research, 35(1), 3-17.
Best, M. J., & Hlouskova, J. (2000). The efficient frontier for bounded assets. Mathematical Methods of Operations Rresearch, 52(2), 195-212.
Brockett, P. L., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Kwon, K. H., & Ruefli, T. W. (1992). Chance constrained programming approach to empirical analyses of mutual fund investment strategies. Decision Sciences, 23(2), 385-408.
Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1959). Chance-constrained programming. Management Science, 6(1), 73-79.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Kwon, K.H., & Ruefli, T.W. (1993). Chance constrained programming and other approaches to risk in strategic management. In: L. Gould, P. Halpern (Eds.).Proceedings of a Conference in Honor of M.J. Gordon, Social Science Research Council of Canada, Ottawa.
Chen, L. H., & Huang, L. (2009). Portfolio optimization of equity mutual funds with fuzzy return rates and risks. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 3720-3727.
Gupta, P., Inuiguchi, M., Mehlawat, M. K., & Mittal, G. (2013). Multiobjective credibilistic portfolio selection model with fuzzy chance-constraints. Information Sciences, 229, 1-17.
Harlow, W. V., & Rao, R. K. (1989). Asset pricing in a generalized mean-lower partial moment framework: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24(03), 285-311.
Holland, J. H.(1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control and artificial intelligence.University of Michigan Press.
Huang, X. (2006). Fuzzy chance-constrained portfolio selection. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 177(2), 500-507.
Huang, X. (2008). Mean-semivariance models for fuzzy portfolio selection. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 217(1), 1-8.
Li, S. X. (1995). An insurance and investment portfolio model using chance constrained programming. Omega, 23(5), 577-585.
Liu, B.(2009).Theory and Practice of Uncertain Programming. 3rd ed. UTLAB.
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
Markowitz, H. (1956). The optimization of a quadratic function subject to linear constraints. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 3(1‐2), 111-133.
Markowitz, H.(1959).Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments. New York: Wiley.
Parra, M. A., Terol, A. B., & Urıa, M. R. (2001). A fuzzy goal programming approach to portfolio selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 133(2), 287-297.
Qin, Z., Wang, D. Z., & Li, X. (2013). Mean-semivariance models for portfolio optimization problem with mixed uncertainty of fuzziness and randomness. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 21(supp01), 127-139.
Qin, Z. (2015). Mean-variance model for portfolio optimization problem in the simultaneous presence of random and uncertain returns. European Journal of Operational Research, 245(2), 480-488.
Sadjadi, S. J., Seyedhosseini, S. M., & Hassanlou, K. (2011). Fuzzy multi period portfolio selection with different rates for borrowing and lending. Applied Soft Computing, 11(4), 3821-3826.
Simaan, Y. (1997). Estimation risk in portfolio selection: the mean variance model versus the mean absolute deviation model. Management Science, 43(10), 1437-1446.
Sun, Y., Aw, G., Loxton, R., & Teo, K. L. (2017). Chance-constrained optimization for pension fund portfolios in the presence of default risk. European Journal of Operational Research, 256(1), 205-214.
Tiryaki, F., & Ahlatcioglu, B. (2009). Fuzzy portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Information Sciences, 179(1), 53-69.
Williams, J. O. (1997). Maximizing the probability of achieving investment goals. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 24(1), 77-81.
Yan, L. (2009). Chance-constrained portfolio selection with birandom returns. Modern Applied Science, 3(4), 161.
Yoshimoto, A. (1996). The mean-variance approach to portfolio optimization subject to transaction costs. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 39(1), 99-117.
Zhang, W. G., & Nie, Z. K. (2004). On admissible efficient portfolio selection problem. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 159(2), 357-371.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Decision Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2017 | 📖 Volume: 6 | 📄 Issue: 3 | 👁️ Views: 1828 | 📊 Crossref: 5

Related Articles:
  • Multi-period fuzzy mean-semi variance portfolio selection problem with transaction cost and minimum transaction lots using genetic algorithm
  • Possibility theory for multiobjective fuzzy random portfolio optimization
  • Asset management using an extended Markowitz theorem
  • An application of Markowitz theorem on Tehran Stock Exchange
  • Multi-objective portfolio optimization of mutual funds under downside risk measure using fuzzy theory

📝 Ready to share your research?

Decision Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com