Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Authors » Hossein Karimi

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (528)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (421)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (293)
  • IJDS (952)
  • JFS (101)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(165)
Vietnam(151)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(115)
Supply chain(112)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(97)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(89)
optimization(87)
Sustainability(86)
Artificial intelligence(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(78)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(66)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(37)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2192)
Indonesia(1311)
Jordan(813)
India(793)
Vietnam(510)
Saudi Arabia(478)
Malaysia(444)
China(231)
United Arab Emirates(226)
Thailand(160)
United States(114)
Ukraine(110)
Turkey(110)
Egypt(106)
Peru(94)
Canada(93)
Morocco(86)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries
Sort articles by: Volume | Date | Most Rates | Most Views | Reviews | Alphabet
1.

Permutation based decision making under fuzzy environment using Tabu search Pages 301-312 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Mahdi Bashiri, Mehdi Koosha, Hossein Karimi

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2012.02.001

Keywords: Fuzzy decision making, NP-Hard, Permutation based decision making, Tabu search

Abstract:
One of the techniques, which are used for Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is the permutation. In the classical form of permutation, it is assumed that weights and decision matrix components are crisp. However, when group decision making is under consideration and decision makers could not agree on a crisp value for weights and decision matrix components, fuzzy numbers should be used. In this article, the fuzzy permutation technique for MCDM problems has been explained. The main deficiency of permutation is its big computational time, so a Tabu Search (TS) based algorithm has been proposed to reduce the computational time. A numerical example has illustrated the proposed approach clearly. Then, some benchmark instances extracted from literature are solved by proposed TS. The analyses of the results show the proper performance of the proposed method.
Details
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: IJIEC | Year: 2012 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 3 | Views: 3147 | Reviews: 0

 
2.

Adjusted permutation method for multiple attribute decision making with meta-heuristic solution approaches Pages 369-384 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Alireza Rezaeinia, Hossein Karimi

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2010.07.002

Keywords: Adjusted permutation, MADM, Particle swarm optimization, Tabu search

Abstract:
The permutation method of multiple attribute decision making has two significant deficiencies:
high computational time and wrong priority output in some problem instances. In this paper, a
novel permutation method called adjusted permutation method (APM) is proposed to
compensate deficiencies of conventional permutation method. We propose Tabu search (TS)
and particle swarm optimization (PSO) to find suitable solutions at a reasonable computational
time for large problem instances. The proposed method is examined using some numerical
examples to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. The preliminary results show
that both approaches provide competent solutions in relatively reasonable amounts of time
while TS performs better to solve APM.
Details
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: IJIEC | Year: 2011 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 2 | Views: 2568 | Reviews: 0

 

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com