Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » Adjusted permutation method for multiple attribute decision making with meta-heuristic solution approaches

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

IJIEC Volumes

    • Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
    • Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • Volume 3 (76)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • Volume 17 (21)
      • Issue 1 (21)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(110)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Sustainability(81)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Artificial intelligence(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2183)
Indonesia(1290)
India(787)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations

ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 2 Issue 2 pp. 369-384 , 2011

Adjusted permutation method for multiple attribute decision making with meta-heuristic solution approaches Pages 369-384 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Alireza Rezaeinia, Hossein Karimi

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2010.07.002

Keywords: Adjusted permutation, MADM, Particle swarm optimization, Tabu search

Abstract: The permutation method of multiple attribute decision making has two significant deficiencies:
high computational time and wrong priority output in some problem instances. In this paper, a
novel permutation method called adjusted permutation method (APM) is proposed to
compensate deficiencies of conventional permutation method. We propose Tabu search (TS)
and particle swarm optimization (PSO) to find suitable solutions at a reasonable computational
time for large problem instances. The proposed method is examined using some numerical
examples to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. The preliminary results show
that both approaches provide competent solutions in relatively reasonable amounts of time
while TS performs better to solve APM.

How to cite this paper
Rezaeinia, A & Karimi, H. (2011). Adjusted permutation method for multiple attribute decision making with meta-heuristic solution approaches.International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations , 2(2), 369-384.

Refrences
Ancot, J., & Paelinck, J. H. P. (1982). Recent experiences with the Qualiflex multicriteria method. in: Paelinck, J. H. P. (Eds.), Qualitative and Quantitative Mathematical Economics., Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 217–266.

Blair, R., & Karnisky, W. (1994). Distribution-free statistical analysis of surface and volumetric maps. Brain Topography, 6, 19–28.

Chen, T., & Wang, J. (2009). Interval-valued fuzzy permutation method and experimental analysis on cardinal and ordinal evaluations. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 75, 371–387.

Chin, L., & Haughton, D. (1996). Analysis of student evaluation of teaching scores using bootstrap and permutation methods. journal of Computing in Higher Education, 8, 69–84.

Chu, T. (2002). Facility Location Selection Using Fuzzy TOPSIS under group decisions. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 10, 687-701.

Clerc, M.(2006). Particle Swarm Optimization. London: ISTE Ltd.

Figueira, J., Salvatore, G., Matthias, E. (2005). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. New York: Springer Science.

Glover, F. (1989). Tabu search: Part I. ORSA Journal on Computing, 1, 190–206.

Glover, F. (1990). Tabu search: Part II. ORSA Journal on Computing, 2, 4-32.

Grabowski, J., & Pempera, J. (2007). The permutation flow shop problem with blocking. A tabu search approach. Omega, 35, 302-311

Grabowski, J., & Wodecki, M. (2004). A very fast tabu search algorithm for the permutation flow shop problem with makespan criterion. Computers and Operations Research, 31, 1891-1909.

Hugonnard, J., & Roy, B. (1982). Le plan d’extension du métro en banlieue parisienne, un cas type d’application de l’analyse multicritère. Les Cahiers Scientifiques de la Revue Transports, 6, 77–108.

Jacquet-Lagreze, E. (1969). L’agrégation des opinions individuelles. en Informatiques et Sciences Humaines, 4, 1-21.

Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. in: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Piscataway, 1942–1948.

Korhonen, P., Moskowitz, H., & Wallenius, J. (1992). Multiple Criteria Decision Support: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 63, 361-375.

Liao, L., & Huang, C. (2010). Tabu search for non-permutation flowshop scheduling problem with minimizing total tardiness. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 217(2), 557-567.

Nowicki, E., & Smutnicki, C. (1996). A fast tabu search algorithm for the permutation flow-shop problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 91, 160-175.

Olson, D. L. (2004). Comparison of Weights in TOPSIS Models. Mathematical and Computer Modeling. 40(7-8), 721-727.

Peng, Y. (2000). Management Decision Analysis. Peking: Science Publications.

Paelinck, J. (1977). Qualitative multiple criteria analysis: an application to airport location. En'liironment and Planning, 9, 893–695.

Pantazis, D., Nichols, T., Baillet, S., & Leahy, R. (2003). Spatiotemporal localization of significant activation in MEG using permutation tests. 18th Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, 512– 523.

Rinnooy K. (1976). Machine Scheduling Problems: Classification, Complexity, and Computations, Nijhoff, The Hague.

Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en présence de critères multiples (la method ELECTRE), RIRO, 8, 57-75.

Roy, B., & Bertier, B. (1971). Le methods ELECTRE II: Une methode de classement en presence de criteres multiples, note de travail no. 142. Direction Scientifique, Groupe Metra.

Roy, B., (1978). ELECTRE III: Un algorithme de classements fondé sur une représentation floue des préférences en présence de critères multiples. Cahiers du CERO, 20, 3–24.

Saaty, T. L. (1990). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA.

Tasgetiren, M. F., Liang, Y. C., Sevkli, M. & Gencyilmaz, G. (2007). A particle swarm optimization algorithm for makespan and total flowtime minimization in the permutation flowshop sequencing problem. European Journal of Operational Research,177, 1930-1947.

Turskis, Z. (2008). Multi-Attribute Contractors Ranking Method by Applying Ordering of Feasible Alternatives of Solutions in Terms of Preferability Technique. Technologic and Economic Developement, 14, 224–239.

Yoon, K., & Hwang, C. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making Method and Applications. Berlin: Springer.
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | Year: 2011 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 2 | Views: 2533 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • A discrete firefly meta-heuristic with local search for makespan minimizati ...
  • 5. Optimizing a multi-objectives flow shop scheduling problem by a novel ...
  • A useful empirical Bayesian method to analyse industrial data from saturate ...
  • A multiple criteria facility layout problem using data envelopment analysis
  • Permutation based decision making under fuzzy environment using Tabu search

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com