Institutional potential plays a key role in creating business opportunities. However, past studies did not emphasize on the consistency and the interaction between institutional and entrepreneurial potential-shaping factors. This research aimed to explore the role of these two aspects in spotting market gaps and encouraging competitiveness. Mixed methods were used, with basic concepts focusing on new institutional economic theory. The results showed that standardization, commercialization, technology, productivity, invention, social capital, and human capital strengthened institutional potential and social entrepreneurship. This created more ventures and encouraged competition. However, there is a need to eliminate institutional barriers to improve the efficiency and productivity of the socio-cultural-economic systems.

During the past few years, organizational commitment has been a major concern in different
types of business activities including banking industry. In this paper, we present an empirical
investigation to study the relationship between social entrepreneurship and organizational
commitment. The proposed study of this paper adapts a standard questionnaire developed by
Meyer and Allen [Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of
organizational commitment. Human resource management review, 1(1), 61-89]. Cronbach
alpha has been calculated for affective commitment, employee engagement and normative
commitment as 0.77, 0.79 and 0.61, respectively. The results of survey indicate that affective
commitment, employee engagement and normative commitment have positively influenced
organizational commitment, significantly. In addition, Freedman test has indicated that
normative commitment is number one priority with mean rank of 2.85 followed by affective
commitment with mean rank of 2.47 and employee engagement with the mean rank of 2.26.