Across the globe, the corollary of Green Cost Premium (GCP) obstructs the implementation of Sustainable Buildings (SB). Extensive studies into GCP proliferate, but the research norms rarely traversed theoretical contexts of GCP. The purpose of this paper was to explore the drivers of GCP from the contexts of the prevailing practice of SB using the theoretical lens of practice theory. Secondary literature comprising mainly peer-reviewed publications spanning 20years was critically reviewed. The results show some uncertainty regarding the effect of prevailing practice on the size of GCP due to the dearth of empirical studies. Secondary literature, however, showed that GCP is liable to variations in practice related to the level of knowledge and the implementation processes. The knowledge domain argued that the scope of GCP depends on regional issues including misperceptions, cost management deficiencies and sustainability accounting gaps. During implementation, GCP could also modify in response to changes in cost drivers, factors limiting innovative processes and challenges and barriers in the project environment. Engagements with practice have, however failed to embed this understanding into SB project implementation decisions and dynamics, as limited documented efforts aimed at mitigating the GCP exist. The paper offers a non-conventional perspective for assessing the dynamics of converging regional practices in SB that can contribute to GCP as well as lower the GCP when the practices are improved. GCP is susceptible to practice variations and answers to projects practices across regions. This portrays that the GCP can lessen through innovation of practice elements such as competencies and inputs (materials and procedures). The elements of scientific inquiry for GCP must be disconnected from currently established knowledge about SB systems to regional practices related to knowledge and procedures.

Construction operations are blamed as one of important causes of green gas effects. During the past few decades, there has been tremendous efforts to reduce the negative effects of construction operations on environment. This paper presents an application of data envelopment analysis to measure the relative efficiencies of the researches accomplished by various countries around the world on green construction or green management. The study expects countries that produce higher amount of CO2 accomplish more quality research articles. To do this, the study performs a survey using three keywords; namely “green construction”, “green building” and “sustainable building” on Scopus database and found 8692 articles over the period 1965-2019 where one of these keywords, at least, was used in their abstracts, keywords or titles. We also use three measures of h-index, I-10 and total publications repre-sentative of quality and quantity of the outputs produced by researchers. The study considers 28 countries responsible for at least 90% of CO2 emission for measuring the relative efficiency program using data envelopment analysis. The results indicate that Hong Kong was the only efficient country followed by Singapore with relative efficiency of 0.67.

Building sector is considered as the biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions around the world. Being green, or sustainable, is one of primary issues coming from internal/ external driv-ers for construction and engineering firms. The green building practice extends and supplement the traditional building design perspectives including economy, utility, durability, and comfort. This paper presents a review on recent advances dedicated on different state-of-art articles in the area of green building. The paper raises serious concern to take the necessary actions for green building development.