Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • ๐Ÿ”™ Back
  • ๐Ÿ“š Journals
    • โš™๏ธ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • ๐ŸŒ IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • ๐Ÿงช CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • ๐Ÿ’น AC - Accounting
    • ๐ŸŽฏ DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • ๐Ÿš› USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • ๐Ÿ—๏ธ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • ๐Ÿฅ HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • ๐Ÿ“ˆ SCI - Scientometrica
    • ๐Ÿ”ฉ ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • ๐ŸŒฟ JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • ๐Ÿ’ผ MSL - Management Science Letters
  • ๐Ÿ“ Submit Article
  • ๐Ÿ“Š Statistics
  • ๐Ÿ“‹ About
    • ๐Ÿ“„ About Us
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Blog
    • ๐Ÿ“ข News
    • ๐Ÿ“ง Contact
  • ๐Ÿ“บ Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Authors » Pradeep Jangir

โญ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (52)

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

โœ๏ธ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

๐ŸŒ Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Sort articles by: ๐Ÿ“– Volume | ๐Ÿ“… Date | โญ Most Rates | ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ Most Views | ๐Ÿš€ Rising Stars | ๐Ÿ”— Citations (Scopus) | ๐Ÿ”ฅ Hot Papers
1.

MaOTLBO: Many-objective teaching-learning-based optimizer for control and monitoring the optimal power flow of modern power systems Pages 293-308 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Pradeep Jangir, Premkumar Manoharan, Sundaram Pandya, Ravichandran Sowmya

doi 10.5267/j.ijiec.2023.1.003

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords: Many-objective teacher learning-based optimizer, Non-dominated sorting, Optimal power flow, Reference point mechanism, Teacher learning-based optimizer

Abstract:
This paper recommends a new Many-Objective Teaching-Learning-Based Optimizer (MaOTLBO) to handle the Many-Objective Optimal Power Flow (MaO-OPF) problem of modern complex power systems while meeting different operating constraints. A reference point-based mechanism is utilized in the basic version of Teacher Learning-Based Optimizer (TLBO) to formulate the MaOTLBO algorithm and directly applied to DTLZ test benchmark functions with 5, 7, 10-objectives and IEEE-30 bus power system with six different objective functions, namely the minimization of the voltage magnitude deviation, total fuel cost, voltage stability indicator, total emission, active power loss, and reactive power loss. The results obtained from the MaOTLBO optimizer are compared with the well-known standard many-objective algorithms, such as the Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition with Dynamical Resource Allocation (MOEA/D-DRA) and Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-version-III (NSGA-III) presented in the literature. The results show the ability of the proposed MaOTLBO to solve the MaO-OPF problem in terms of convergence, coverage, and well-Spread Pareto optimal solutions. The experimental outcomes indicate that the suggested MaOTLBO gives improved individual output and compromised solutions than MOEA/D-DRA and NSGA-III algorithms.
Details
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: IJIEC | Year: 2023 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 2 | Views: 1545

 
2.

MaOMFO: Many-objective moth flame optimizer using reference-point based non-dominated sorting mechanism for global optimization problems Pages 571-590 PDF Download PDF

Authors: M. Premkumar, Pradeep Jangir, R. Sowmya, Laith Abualigah

doi 10.5267/j.dsl.2023.4.006

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords: Evolutionary, Many-objective algorithm, Moth flame optimizer, Non-dominated sorting, Optimization algorithm

Abstract:
Many-objective optimization (MaO) deals with a large number of conflicting objectives in optimization problems to acquire a reliable set of appropriate non-dominated solutions near the true Pareto front, and for the same, a unique mechanism is essential. Numerous papers have reported multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to explain the absence of convergence and diversity variety in many-objective optimization problems. One of the most encouraging methodologies utilizes many reference points to segregate the solutions and guide the search procedure. The above-said methodology is integrated into the basic version of the Moth Flame Optimization (MFO) algorithm for the first time in this paper. The proposed Many-Objective Moth Flame Optimization (MaOMFO) utilizes a set of reference points progressively decided by the hunt procedure of the moth flame. It permits the calculation to combine with the Pareto front yet synchronize the decent variety of the Pareto front. MaOMFO is employed to solve a wide range of unconstrained and constrained benchmark functions and compared with other competitive algorithms, such as non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm, multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on dominance and decomposition, and novel multi-objective particle swarm optimization using different performance metrics. The results demonstrate the superiority of the algorithm as a new many-objective algorithm for complex many-objective optimization problems.
Details
  • 85
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: DSL | Year: 2023 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 3 | Views: 1353

 

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com