Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Authors » Parames Chutima

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (528)
  • USCM (1099)
  • ESM (421)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (293)
  • IJDS (952)
  • JFS (101)
  • HE (37)
  • SCI (36)

Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(165)
Vietnam(151)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(115)
Supply chain(112)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(97)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(89)
optimization(87)
Sustainability(87)
Artificial intelligence(86)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(79)
Social media(78)
Factor analysis(78)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(66)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(37)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2198)
Indonesia(1311)
Jordan(815)
India(798)
Vietnam(510)
Saudi Arabia(478)
Malaysia(446)
China(231)
United Arab Emirates(226)
Thailand(160)
United States(115)
Turkey(112)
Ukraine(110)
Egypt(106)
Peru(94)
Canada(93)
Morocco(86)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries
Sort articles by: Volume | Date | Most Rates | Most Views | Reviews | Alphabet
1.

Assembly line balancing with cobots: An extensive review and critiques Pages 785-804 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Parames Chutima

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2023.7.001

Keywords: Human-Robot Collaboration, Cobots, Assembly Line Balancing, Literature Review

Abstract:
Industry 4.0 encourages industries to digitise the manufacturing system to facilitate human-robot collaboration (HRC) to foster efficiency, agility and resilience. This cutting-edge technology strikes a balance between fully automated and manual operations to maximise the benefits of both humans and assistant robots (known as cobots) working together on complicated and prone-to-hazardous tasks in a collaborative manner in an assembly system. However, the introduction of HRC poses a significant challenge for assembly line balancing since, besides typical assigning tasks to workstations, the other two important decisions must also be made regarding equipping workstations with appropriate cobots as well as scheduling collaborative tasks for workers and cobots. In this article, the cobot assembly line balancing problem (CoALBP), which just initially emerged a few years ago, is thoroughly reviewed. The 4M1E (i.e., man, machine, material, method and environment) framework is applied for categorising the problem to make the review process more effective. All of the articles reviewed are compared, and their key distinct features are summarised. Finally, guidelines for additional studies on the CoALBP are offered.
Details
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: IJIEC | Year: 2023 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 4 | Views: 3387 | Reviews: 0

 
2.

Cockpit crew pairing Pareto optimisation in a budget airline Pages 67-80 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Parames Chutima, Nicha Krisanaphan

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2021.8.001

Keywords: Multi-objective optimization, Cockpit crew pairing, Budget airline, Pareto optimal

Abstract:
Crew pairing is the primary cost checkpoint in airline crew scheduling. Because the crew cost comes second after the fuel cost, a substantial cost saving can be gained from effective crew pairing. In this paper, the cockpit crew pairing problem (CCPP) of a budget airline was studied. Unlike the conventional CCPP that focuses solely on the cost component, many more objectives deemed to be no less important than cost minimisation were also taken into consideration. The adaptive non-dominated sorting differential algorithm III (ANSDE III) was proposed to optimise the CCPP against many objectives simultaneously. The performance of ANSDE III was compared against the NSGA III, MOEA/D, and MODE algorithms under several Pareto optimal measurements, where ANSDE III outperformed the others in every metric.
Details
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: IJIEC | Year: 2022 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 1 | Views: 1746 | Reviews: 0

 

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com