The effect of informal communication on the leadership styles in governmental organizations


Saeed Sehhat, Mehdi Jafarzadeh Kenaria and Mehdi Alipour


These days, it is not possible to accomplish tasks without having productive relationships with the rest of the world. Although there are some evidences, which indicate informal organizations normally face some limitations on their return but there are also some studies suggesting that informal organizations are the best ways for making significant changes. Recently, many people have suggested that informal organizations provide good infrastructures for organization's workflow many conflict of interests could be solved using informal communications. News can be distributed in organizations through informal units much easier and it is easier to handle them. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between informal communications with leadership style in some of governmental organizations located in free islands of Chabahar, in south east part of Iran. The proposed model of this paper designs a questionnaire and distributes it among many people who are acting as managers in those firms. The preliminary results indicate that there is a positive and meaningful relationship between leadership style and informal relationships.


DOI: j.msl.2012.06.043

Keywords: Leadership style ,Informal relationship ,Task-oriented leadership ,Relationship-oriented leadership

How to cite this paper:

Sehhat, S., Kenaria, M & Alipour, M. (2012). The effect of informal communication on the leadership styles in governmental organizations.Management Science Letters, 2(7), 2637-2642.


References

Battilana, J., Gilmartin, M., Sengul, M., Pache, A.C., & Alexander, J.A. (2010). Leadership competencies for implementing planned organizational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 422-438

Jahromi, S.A.S., Gholtash, A., & Saeedian, M. (2011). A study of the relationship between dominant brain hemispheres with leadership styles, task oriented and relation oriented (integrated) among active managers of Shiraz University of medical sciences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 633-636.

Özsahin, M., Zehir, C., Acar, A.Z. (2011). Linking leadership style to firm performance: the mediating effect of the learning orientation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1546-1559.

Rodgers, J.L., & Nicewander, W.L. (1988). Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician, 42(1), 59–66.

Shondrick, S.J., Dinh, J.E., & Lord, R.G. (2010). Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: Applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 959-978.

Soper, H.E., Young, A.W., Cave, B.M., Lee, A., Pearson, K. (1917). On the distribution of the correlation coefficient in small samples. Appendix II to the papers of "Student" and R. A. Fisher. A co-operative study, Biometrika, 11, 328-413.Zehir, C. Ertosun, Ö. G., Zehir, S. & Müceldili, B. (2011). The Effects of Leadership Styles and Organizational Culture over Firm Performance: Multi-National Companies in İstanbul. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1460-1474.