The present research purpose is applying a compose method from DEA and AHP for removing this technique deficiency on assessing. For this reason, a compose method on basis of unsubjective double comparisons matrix has been used. At research process, after specifying the input and output variables and also a proper model for DEA, computational research method are dismounted at two stages: At the first stage, DEA model, is dismounted for two-by –two of items (branches), regardless to other items. At the second stage, double items comparisons matrix is provided from first stage results, that is performed total rating by resolving a unit – level AHP model. For this purpose, for dismounting this technique, we have attempted to assess rivet producer units efficiency, at one of the greatest industrial units in Iran. Results indicate unit number 3 with efficiency amount 0.12622 has allocated the highest rate to own and unit number 1 and 2 with efficiency 0.12404 has allocated the least rates to own.

zarei, A., Mehdiabadi, A & Javidnia, M. (2012). Measuring the units efficiency using an integrated DEA–AHP method: A case study of rivet producer.Management Science Letters, 2(1), 189-196.

Azadeh, A., Ghaderi, S.F., & Izadbakhsh, H. (2007). Integration of DEA and AHP with computer simulation for railway system improvement and optimization. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 195, 775-785.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.

Charnes, A, Cooper W. W., Lewin, A., & Seiford, L. M. (1994). Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology and applications. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Chen, T.Y., & Chen, L.H. (2007). DEA performance evaluation based on BSC indicators incorporated, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(4), 335-357.

Chen. Y. Q., Lu, H., Lu, W., & Zhang, N. (2010). Analysis of project delivery systems in Chinese construction industry with data envelopment analysis (DEA), Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17(6), 598-614.Ertay, T., Ruan, D., & Tuzkaya, U.R. (2006). Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems. Information Sciences, 176, 237-262.

Gregoriou, G.N., & Zhu, J. (2005). Evaluating Hedge Funds and CTA Performance: Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. John Wiley: New York

Guo, J.Y., Liu, J., & Qiu, L. (2006). Research on supply chain performance evaluation: based on DEA/AHP model. Proceedings of the IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Services Computing (APSCC’02).Ho, W. (2008). Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications – a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 211-128.Jalalvand, F., Teimoury, E., Makui, A., Aryanezhad, M. B, Jolai, F. (2010). A method to compare supply chains of an industry, Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology.Jing-yuan, G., Jia, L., & Li, Q. (2006). Research on supply chain performance evaluation based on DEA/AHP model. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Services Computing (APSCC`06).Kang H. Y., & Lee Amy H.I(2010). A new supplier performance evaluation model (A case study of integrated circuit(IC) packaging companies). Kybernetes, 39(1), 37-54.

Korpela, J., Lehmusvaara, A., & Nisonen, J. (2007). Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 108, 135-142.

Lozano, S., & Villa, G. (2007). Multiobjective target setting in data envelopment analysis using AHP. Computers & Operations Research, 36(2), 549-564.

Mario. S, Matijs. L, Marko. L, & Ivan. M. (2011), Modeliplaniranja I odlucivanja u sumarstvu, Znansteveni rad-Research article, Croatian Journal for Engineering, 32(1), 443-456.Pierce, J. (1997). Efficiency progress in the New South Wales government. NSW Treasury Research & Information Paper, No. TRP97-8, NSW Treasury, Sydney.Ramanathan, R. (2006). Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process. Computers & Operations Research, 33, 1289-1307.

Rickards R.C. (2003). Setting benchmarks and evaluating balanced scorecards with data envelopment analysis. International Journal a Benchmarking, 10(3), 45-226.

Saaty, T.L. (1994). Fundamentals of Decision Making. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA.Saaty, T.L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9-26.

Simos, T.E., & Maroulis, G. (2007). Computation in modern science and engineering. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Methods in Science and Engineering.Wang, Y.M., Liu, J., & Elhag, T. M.S. (2007). An integrated AHP-DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment. Computer & Industrial Engineering, 54(3), 513-525.

Yang, T., & Kuo, C. (2003). A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for facilities layout design problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 147, 128-136.