Ergo-ffects of esigned school urniture and sitting positions on students' behaviour and musculo-skeletal isorder in Nigerian tertiary institutions


A. I Musa, S. O. Ismaila, S. B. Adejuyigbe and O.D. AkinyemiMechanical Engineering Department, Moshood Abiola Polytechnic, P.M.B. 2210, Abeokuta, Nigeria


Improper design of school furniture is one of the contributing factors to back pain among students as indicated in some studies. In the case of designing school furniture where sitting constitutes a considerable time in the school, seat becomes important for comfort. This study is carried out in three selected institutions in Nigeria to determine level of musculoskeletal disorder in students’ and the furniture that they use. 720 questionnaires with 240 students (120 boys and 120 girls) drawn from each participating institutions were administered and 675 responses were received. The results show that the number of students having MSD, accounted for 93.75%. However, the distributions of pain in the body parts in each school were different. The musculoskeletal pain, mostly concentrated on neck, right shoulders right elbow right wrist right hand, upper back and lower back. The result also reveals that most of the students are sitting on chairs with seat that are too high and too deep or too shallow and of tables that are too high. However, it is recommended that further study on effect of designed school furniture and sitting position in larger sample of students’ representative in Nigeria tertiary institutions should be carried out in order to reduce the effect of body pains.


DOI: j.msl.2011.03.002

Keywords: MSD ,Furniture ,Student ,School

How to cite this paper:

Musa, A., Ismaila, S., Adejuyigbe, S & Nigeria, O. (2011). Ergo-ffects of esigned school urniture and sitting positions on students' behaviour and musculo-skeletal isorder in Nigerian tertiary institutions.Management Science Letters, 1(3), 331-334.


References

Bergqvist, U., Wolgast, E., Nilsson, B., & Voss, M., (1995). Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal workers: individual, ergonomic, and work organizational factors. Ergonomics 38, 763–776.

Bergqvist, U.O., & Knave, B.G., (1994). Eye discomfort and work with visual display terminals. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment Health 20, 27–33.

Burton, A.K., Clark, R.D., McClune, T.D., & Tillotson, K.M., (1996). The natural history of low back pain in adolescents. Spine 201, 2323-2328.Diep N.B., (2003). Evaluation of fitness between school furniture and children body size in haiphong, Vietnam [dissertation]. Vietnam: Lulea Institute of Technology.

Evans, O., Collins, B. & Stewart, A., (1992). Is school furniture responsible for student seating discomfort?. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Australia, Melbourne.Fairbank J.C.T., Pynsent, P.B., Van Poortvliet, J.A & Phillips, H., (1984). Influence of anthropometric factors and joint laxity in the incidence of adolescent back pain. spine, 9, 461-464.

Hertzberg, H.T.E. (1968). The Conference on Standardization of Anthropometric Techniques and Terminology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 28, 1-15.

Legg, S J., Pajo, K., Sullman, M & Marfell-Jones, M., (2003). Mismatch between classroom furniture dimensions and student anthropometric characteristics in three New Zealand secondary schools. Proceedings of the 15th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for Children in Educational Environments Symposium, 6, 395-7, Seoul, Korea, 24-29 August.

Linton, S. J., Hellsing, A. L., Halme, T., & Akerstedt, K. (1994). The effects of ergonomically designed school furniture on pupils’ attitudes, symptoms and behaviour. Applied Ergonomics, 25, 2399-2304.Mandal, A.C., (1982). The correct height of school furniture. Human Factors, 24, 257-269.

Mierau, D., Cassidy, J.D., & Young-Hing, H., (1989). Low back pain and straight leg raising in children and adolescents. Spine, 14, 526-528.

Molenbroek J.F.N., Kroon-Ramaekers & Snijders C. J. (2003). Revision of the design of a standard for the dimensions of school furniture. Ergonomics, 46(7), 681 – 694.

Olsen, T. L, Anderson, R.L, Dearwater, S.R., Kriska, A.M., Cauley, J.A., Aaron, D.J, & Laporte R.E., (1992). The epidemiology of low back pain in an adolescent population. American Journal of Public health, 82(4), 606-608.

Pynt, J., Higgs, J., & Mackey, M. (2001), Seeking the optimal posture of the seated lumbar spine. Physiotherapy theory and practice, 17, 1, 5-21.

Richardson, A. (2005). A brief guide to design education. http://www.core77.com/design.edu/readme.asp.

Salminen J., (1984). The adolescent back. Acta Pediatrican Scandinavica, 315, 1-12.

Salminen, J. J., Pentti, J. & Trho, P. (1992). Low back pain and disability in 14 years old school children. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica, 81,1034-1039.

Schroder, I., (1997). Variation of sitting posture and physical activity in different types of school furniture. Coll Anthrop, 21(2), 397-403.

Troussier, B., Davione, P., de Gaudemaries, R., R., Fauconnier, J, & Phelip, X., (1994). Back pain in school children; A case study among 1178 pupils. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medical, 26(3), 143-146.

Tunay, M. & Melemez, K. (2008). Analysis of Biomechanical and Anthropometric parameters on Classroom furniture design. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7 (8).Zhang, L., Helander, M.G., & Drury, C.G. (1996). Indentifying factors of comfort and discomfort in sitting. Human Factors, 38 (3), 377–389.