A system dynamic model for measuring the construction quality of buildings' structures


Mehrdad Shokouh-Abdi, Morteza Zahedi and Ahmad Makui


One of the most important issues on quality of building structure is its resistance against earthquake. Earthquake, as one of natural disasters, has been one of the main reasons of fatal incidents in developing countries. Any attempt to increase the quality of building structure could reduce any possible damages an earthquake could cause on society. This paper presents a system dynamic model to study the importance and behavior of the factors which affect the construction quality of buildings' structures. The proposed model of this paper is analyzed for a case study and the results are discussed. The paper also uses DEMATEL technique to compare the results of the proposed method. The paper concludes that among the whole factors which affect the construction quality of buildings' structures, the "performance of related organizations and institutions" is of the most important ones.


DOI: j.msl.2011.01.001

Keywords: Dependence and feedback ,Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) ,System dynamic ,Construction building

How to cite this paper:

Shokouh-Abdi, M., Zahedi, M & Makui, A. (2011). A system dynamic model for measuring the construction quality of buildings' structures.Management Science Letters, 1(2), 127-138.


References

Abdelsalam, H. M. E., & Gad, M. M. (2009). Cost of quality in Dubai: An analytical case study of residential construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 27(5), 501-511.

Arditi, D. & Gunaydin, H. M. (1997). Total quality management in the construction process. International Journal of Project Management, 15(4), 235-243.

Gebremicael, M., Yuan, H., & Tomsovic, K. (2009). Use of System Dynamics for Studying a Reregulated West African Power Pool, Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE PES General Meeting, Calgary, July 2009.

Fontela, E., & Gabus, A. (1976). The DEMATEL observer, DEMATEL 1976 report. Switzerland Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Center.

Leung, S. W., Mak, S., & Lee, B. L. P. (2008). Using a real-time integrated communication system to monitor the progress and quality of construction works. Automation in Construction, 17(6), 749-757.

Mukherjee, A., Rojas, E. M., & Winn, W. D. (2005). Understanding cognitive and metacognitive processes in construction management: The system dynamics perspective, Construction Research Congress, doi:10.1061/40754(183)46.

Nasirzadeh, F. Afshar, A., Khanzadi, M. & Howick, S. (2008). Integrating system dynamics and fuzzy logic modelling for construction risk management, 26(11), 1197 – 1212.

Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business ynamics, systems thinking and modeling for omplex world. McGraw-Hill, New Jersey.

Shen, L.Y., Wu, Y. Z., Chan, E. H. W., & Hao, J.L. (2005). Application of system dynamics for assessment of sustainable performance of construction projects, Journal of Zhejiang University Science, 6A(4), 339-349.

Yi, T., Xiao, G. (2008). Applying system dynamics to analyze the impact of incentive factors' allocation on construction cost and risk. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Kunming, 12-15.

Zhang, H., & Xing, F. (2010). Fuzzy-multi-objective particle swarm optimization for time–cost–quality tradeoff in construction. Automation in Construction, 19(8), 1067-1075.