Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Engineering Solid Mechanics » Anthropomorphic mechanical design and Lyapunov-based control of a new shoulder rehabilitation system

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (51)
  • SCI (51)

ESM Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 14 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (32)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (39)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (35)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (36)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (28)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (32)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (25)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (16)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (4)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(172)
Supply chain management(169)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(114)
Service quality(101)
Artificial intelligence(101)
Competitive advantage(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(94)
Sustainability(93)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(84)
Financial performance(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Organizational performance(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(68)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(41)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(32)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Engineering Solid Mechanics
ISSN 2291-8752 (Online) - ISSN 2291-8744 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 2 Issue 3 pp. 151-162, 2014

Anthropomorphic mechanical design and Lyapunov-based control of a new shoulder rehabilitation system Pages 151-162 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Mahdieh Babaiasl, Ahmad Ghanbari, SMRS Noorani

📋 Author Affiliations:
Mahdieh Babaiasl ORCID , Ahmad Ghanbari ORCID , SMRS Noorani
¹ School of Engineering Emerging Technologies, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
doi 10.5267/j.esm.2014.5.002
4 Source: Scopus
Crossref 4 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Anthropomorphic Mechanical, Design, Disturbance rejection, Exoskeleton robots, Lyapunov-based controller, Nonlinear control, Robot-aided rehabilitation, Stroke, Tracking problem

Abstract: Stroke is one of the main causes of disability. It affects millions of people worldwide. One symptom of stroke is disabled arm function. Restoration of arm function is necessary to resuming activities of daily living (ADL). Along with traditional rehabilitation techniques, robot-aided therapy has emerged recently. The control schemes of rehabilitation robots are designed for two reasons. First they are designed for passive rehabilitation in which the robot guides the patient & apos; s limb through a predefined path and second for active rehabilitation in which the patient initiates the movement and is partially assisted or resisted by the robotic device. This paper introduces a new robot for shoulder rehabilitation. The Shoulder Rehabilitation System (SRS) has three degrees of freedom (DOFs) for three rotational DOFs of the shoulder but additional translational DOFs of the shoulder are also allowed to avoid discomfort to the patient. A new open circular mechanism is proposed for the third joint that solves the known issues for rehabilitation robots such as long wiring and discomfort associated with closed mechanisms. Lyapunov-based controller with integral action is proposed to guide the robot through a predefined trajectory. Simulation results proved that the proposed controller can track the desired trajectory; reject constant bounded disturbance to the system and is robust due to its nonlinear nature. The proposed controller is designed to be used in passive rehabilitation.

How to cite this paper
APA: Babaiasl, M., Ghanbari, A & Noorani, S. (2014). Anthropomorphic mechanical design and Lyapunov-based control of a new shoulder rehabilitation system. Engineering Solid Mechanics, 2(3), 151-162.
Chicago/Turabian: Babaiasl, M., Ghanbari, A & Noorani, S. 2014. "Anthropomorphic mechanical design and Lyapunov-based control of a new shoulder rehabilitation system." Engineering Solid Mechanics 2, no. 3 (2014): 151-162.
AMA: Babaiasl, M., Ghanbari, A & Noorani, S. Anthropomorphic mechanical design and Lyapunov-based control of a new shoulder rehabilitation system. Engineering Solid Mechanics. 2014;2(3):151-162.

References
Brainin, M., Bornstein, N., Boysen,G., & Demarin, V. (2000). Acute neurological stroke care in Europe: results of the European Stroke Care Inventory. European Journal of Neurology, 7 (1), 5-10.

Carignan, C., Liszka, M., & Roderick, S. (2005). Design of an arm exoskeleton with scapula motion for shoulder rehabilitation. In: Advanced Robotics, ICAR & apos; 05. Proceedings., 12th International Conference on. IEEE, pp 524-531.

Fazekas, G., Horvath, M., Troznai, T., & Toth, A. (2007). Robot-mediated upper limb physiotherapy for patients with spastic hemiparesis: a preliminary study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39 (7), 580-582.

Frisoli, A., Borelli, L., Montagner, A., Marcheschi, S., Procopio, C., Salsedo, F., Bergamasco, M., Carboncini, M., Tolaini, M., & Rossi, B. (2007) Arm rehabilitation with a robotic exoskeleleton in Virtual Reality. In: Rehabilitation Robotics, 2007. ICORR 2007. IEEE 10th International Conference on, IEEE, 631-642.

Hesse, S., Schulte-Tigges, G., Konrad, M., Bardeleben, A., & Werner, C. (2003). Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects1. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 84 (6), 915-920.

Khalil, H.K. (2002). Nonlinear systems. Vol. 3: Prentice hall Upper Saddle River.

Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B.J., & Krebs, H.I. (2008). Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 22 (2), 111-121.

Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., Aisen, M.L., & Volpe, B.T. (1998). Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 6 (1), 75-87.

Lee, C., Lee, B., & Nigam, R. (1983). Development of the generalized d & apos; Alembert equations of motion for mechanical manipulators. in Decision and Control, 1983. The 22nd IEEE Conference on, 1205-1210.

Lloyd-Jones, D., Adams, R.J., Brown, T.M., Carnethon, M., Dai, S., De Simone, G., Ferguson, T.B., Ford, E., Furie, K., & Gillespie, C. (2010). Heart disease and stroke statistics—2010 update A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 121(7), e46-e215.

Lum, P.S., Burgar, C.G., Van der Loos, M., Shor, P.C., Majmundar, M., Yap, R. (2006). MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study. Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 43(5), 631.

Loureiro, R., Amirabdollahian, F., Topping, M., Driessen, B., & Harwin, W. (2003). Upper limb robot mediated stroke therapy—GENTLE/s approach. Autonomous Robots, 15 (1), 35-51.

Mahmood, M., & Mhaskar, P. (2012). Lyapunov-based model predictive control of stochastic nonlinear systems. Automatica, 48, 2271-2276.

Mihelj, M., Nef, T., & Riener, R. (2007). ARMin II-7 DoF rehabilitation robot: mechanics and kinematics. In: Robotics and Automation, IEEE International Conference, 2007. IEEE, pp 4120-4125.

Nakayama, H., J?rgensen, H., Raaschou, H., & Olsen, T.S. (1994). Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 75 (4), 394.

Nef, T., Mihelj, M., & Riener, R. (2007). ARMin: a robot for patient-cooperative arm therapy. Medical & biological engineering & computing, 45 (9), 887-900.

Nef, T., Guidali, M., & Riener, R. (2009). ARMin III–arm therapy exoskeleton with an ergonomic shoulder actuation. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 6 (2), 127-142.

Pons, J.L. (2008). Wearable robots: biomechatronic exoskeletons.

Prange, G.B., Jannink, M.J., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C.G., Hermens, H.J., & IJzerman, M.J. (2006). Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 43 (2), 171.

Reinkensmeyer, D.J., Kahn, L.E., Averbuch, M., McKenna-Cole, A., Schmit, B.D., & Rymer, W.Z. (2000). Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 37 (6), 653-662.

Stienen, A.H., Hekman, E.E., Van der Helm, F.C., Prange, G.B., Jannink, M.J., Aalsma, A.M., & Van der Kooij, H. (2007). Dampace: dynamic force-coordination trainer for the upper extremities. In: Rehabilitation Robotics, 2007. ICORR 2007. IEEE 10th International Conference on, 2007. IEEE, pp 820-826.

Sanchez, R.J., Liu, J., Rao, S., Shah, P., Smith, R., Rahman, T., Cramer, S.C., Bobrow, J.E., & Reinkensmeyer, D.J. (2006). Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 14 (3), 378-389.

Siciliano, B., & Sciavicco, L. (2009). Robotics: modelling, planning and control: Springer Verlag.

Thorvaldsen, P., Asplund, K., Kuulasmaa, K., Rajakangas, A-M., & Schroll, M. (1995). Stroke incidence, case fatality, and mortality in the WHO MONICA project. Stroke, 26 (3), 361-367.

Toth, A., Fazekas, G., Arz, G., Jurak, M., & Horvath, M. (2005). Passive robotic movement therapy of the spastic hemiparetic arm with REHAROB: report of the first clinical test and the follow-up system improvement. In: Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005. 9th International Conference on, IEEE, 127-130.

Winter, D.A. (2009). Biomechanics and motor control of human movement: John Wiley & Sons.
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Engineering Solid Mechanics | 📅 Year: 2014 | 📖 Volume: 2 | 📄 Issue: 3 | 👁️ Views: 15252 | 📊 Crossref: 4

Related Articles:
  • Numerical method to measure velocity integration, stroke volume and cardiac output while rest: using 2D fluid-solid interaction model
  • A new effective algorithm for on-line robot motion planning
  • A solution to robot selection problems using data envelopment analysis
  • A survey on impact of interval and combined training on breast stroke swimming
  • Sufficient conditions for a flexible manufacturing system to be deadlocked

📝 Ready to share your research?

Engineering Solid Mechanics is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com